Identification of Acute Respiratory Failure Phenotypes With Electronic Health Record Data

Charles R. Terry MD, MSCR , Daniel L. Brinton PhD , Katie G. Kirchoff MS , Andrew J. Goodwin MD, MSCR , Dee W. Ford MD, MSCR
{"title":"Identification of Acute Respiratory Failure Phenotypes With Electronic Health Record Data","authors":"Charles R. Terry MD, MSCR ,&nbsp;Daniel L. Brinton PhD ,&nbsp;Katie G. Kirchoff MS ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Goodwin MD, MSCR ,&nbsp;Dee W. Ford MD, MSCR","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Secondary analysis of clinical trial data and highly selected observational cohorts have identified 2 subphenotypes in acute respiratory failure, but have not been reported previously using only real-world electronic health record (EHR) data.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>Are subphenotypes of acute ventilator-dependent respiratory failure identifiable using readily available EHR data?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This multicenter retrospective cohort study used patient encounters from the Medical University of South Carolina (n = 4,233 between 2016 and 2023) and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (n = 8,313 between 2001 and 2012) to train and validate K-means models with multiply imputed cluster analysis at 24 and 48 hours after intubation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Clustering models identified 2 clusters for 24-hour and 48-hour models in both training and test cohorts with clusters separating on variables related to pulmonary physiology, perfusion, organ dysfunction, and metabolic dysregulation. Cluster 2 showed higher 90-day mortality after discharge and more ventilator days compared with cluster 1 that persisted despite multivariable adjustment for age, illness severity, and comorbidities. Cluster models and clusters were stable in 0- to 24-hour and 25- to 48-hour models with crossover (29.2% and 25.9% of the test and training cohorts) from the higher-acuity cluster 2 to the lower-acuity cluster 1 subphenotype occurring by 48 hours after intubation.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our results suggest that acute ventilator-dependent respiratory failure has 2 subphenotypes that are discernible using readily available data from EHRs with identifiable differences in pulmonary physiologic features, perfusion, organ dysfunction, and metabolic dysregulation at 24 and 48 hours after intubation. This may enable future EHR tools to identify particularly vulnerable patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978842500036X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Secondary analysis of clinical trial data and highly selected observational cohorts have identified 2 subphenotypes in acute respiratory failure, but have not been reported previously using only real-world electronic health record (EHR) data.

Research Question

Are subphenotypes of acute ventilator-dependent respiratory failure identifiable using readily available EHR data?

Study Design and Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study used patient encounters from the Medical University of South Carolina (n = 4,233 between 2016 and 2023) and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (n = 8,313 between 2001 and 2012) to train and validate K-means models with multiply imputed cluster analysis at 24 and 48 hours after intubation.

Results

Clustering models identified 2 clusters for 24-hour and 48-hour models in both training and test cohorts with clusters separating on variables related to pulmonary physiology, perfusion, organ dysfunction, and metabolic dysregulation. Cluster 2 showed higher 90-day mortality after discharge and more ventilator days compared with cluster 1 that persisted despite multivariable adjustment for age, illness severity, and comorbidities. Cluster models and clusters were stable in 0- to 24-hour and 25- to 48-hour models with crossover (29.2% and 25.9% of the test and training cohorts) from the higher-acuity cluster 2 to the lower-acuity cluster 1 subphenotype occurring by 48 hours after intubation.

Interpretation

Our results suggest that acute ventilator-dependent respiratory failure has 2 subphenotypes that are discernible using readily available data from EHRs with identifiable differences in pulmonary physiologic features, perfusion, organ dysfunction, and metabolic dysregulation at 24 and 48 hours after intubation. This may enable future EHR tools to identify particularly vulnerable patients.
用电子健康记录数据识别急性呼吸衰竭表型
临床试验数据的二次分析和高度选择的观察性队列已经确定了急性呼吸衰竭的2个亚表型,但以前仅使用真实世界的电子健康记录(EHR)数据尚未报道。研究问题:急性呼吸机依赖性呼吸衰竭的亚表型是否可以通过现有的电子病历数据来识别?研究设计和方法本多中心回顾性队列研究使用来自南卡罗来纳医科大学(2016年至2023年期间n = 4233)和重症监护医学信息市场III(2001年至2012年期间n = 8313)的患者就诊资料,在插管后24和48小时使用多重输入聚类分析训练和验证K-means模型。结果聚类模型在训练和测试队列中分别为24小时和48小时模型确定了2个聚类,并根据肺生理、灌注、器官功能障碍和代谢失调等相关变量进行聚类分离。尽管对年龄、疾病严重程度和合并症进行了多变量调整,但与第1类患者相比,第2类患者出院后90天死亡率更高,使用呼吸机天数更长。在0- 24小时和25- 48小时模型中,聚类模型和聚类是稳定的,在插管后48小时发生从高锐度聚类2到低锐度聚类1亚表型的交叉(29.2%和25.9%的测试和训练队列)。我们的研究结果表明,急性呼吸机依赖型呼吸衰竭有两种亚表型,可通过电子病历中可获得的数据识别,在插管后24和48小时在肺生理特征、灌注、器官功能障碍和代谢失调方面存在可识别的差异。这可能使未来的电子病历工具能够识别特别脆弱的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信