Numerical investigation on the flow field and propulsion performance of rotating detonation afterburner with dual injection scheme

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Peilin Liu, Xiangjun Zhang, Yixiang Li, Yiting Dang, John Z. Ma, Jian-ping Wang
{"title":"Numerical investigation on the flow field and propulsion performance of rotating detonation afterburner with dual injection scheme","authors":"Peilin Liu,&nbsp;Xiangjun Zhang,&nbsp;Yixiang Li,&nbsp;Yiting Dang,&nbsp;John Z. Ma,&nbsp;Jian-ping Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ast.2025.110821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rotating detonation afterburners have gained increasing attention for their potential to enhance propulsion performance. Traditional outer injection scheme tends to be employed to maintain the rotating detonation. In the study, the feasibility of the dual injection scheme for organizing stable detonation is numerically verified based on the hollow chamber. The differences between the two injection schemes are analyzed. Results show that additional inner injection creates an air column, resulting in a flow field similar to that in an annular chamber, excluding the mixed layer around the injection interface. Thereby, higher pressure gain is achieved. Based on this dual injection scheme, influences of nozzle structure and injection direction are discussed. It is found that detonation waves, different streams, and the nozzle affect the outer mass flux differently. Compared to axial injection of bypass flow, radial injection can maintain both stable detonation and deflagration. However, it tends to have a lower detonation fraction. Net thrust is used to analyze the propulsion performance. The dual injection scheme reduces fuel consumption with little change in net thrust. Moreover, parallel injection within the dual injection scheme is conducive to realizing the detonation dominant burning, resulting in more significant performance improvements. This study provides valuable insights and support for the optimal design of rotating detonation afterburners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50955,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Science and Technology","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 110821"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963825008922","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rotating detonation afterburners have gained increasing attention for their potential to enhance propulsion performance. Traditional outer injection scheme tends to be employed to maintain the rotating detonation. In the study, the feasibility of the dual injection scheme for organizing stable detonation is numerically verified based on the hollow chamber. The differences between the two injection schemes are analyzed. Results show that additional inner injection creates an air column, resulting in a flow field similar to that in an annular chamber, excluding the mixed layer around the injection interface. Thereby, higher pressure gain is achieved. Based on this dual injection scheme, influences of nozzle structure and injection direction are discussed. It is found that detonation waves, different streams, and the nozzle affect the outer mass flux differently. Compared to axial injection of bypass flow, radial injection can maintain both stable detonation and deflagration. However, it tends to have a lower detonation fraction. Net thrust is used to analyze the propulsion performance. The dual injection scheme reduces fuel consumption with little change in net thrust. Moreover, parallel injection within the dual injection scheme is conducive to realizing the detonation dominant burning, resulting in more significant performance improvements. This study provides valuable insights and support for the optimal design of rotating detonation afterburners.
双喷射旋转爆轰加力燃烧室流场及推进性能的数值研究
旋转爆轰加力燃烧室因其提高推进性能的潜力而受到越来越多的关注。传统的外喷方案往往是为了维持旋转爆轰而采用的。在研究中,数值验证了基于空心腔室的双喷射方案组织稳定爆震的可行性。分析了两种注入方案的差异。结果表明,额外的内注入形成了一个气柱,导致了类似于环形腔室的流场,但不包括注入界面周围的混合层。因此,获得了更高的压力增益。在此基础上,讨论了喷嘴结构和喷射方向对双喷射方案的影响。研究发现,爆震波、不同流、喷管对外质量通量的影响是不同的。与旁通流的轴向喷射相比,径向喷射可以保持稳定的爆轰和爆燃。然而,它往往有一个较低的爆轰分数。净推力用于分析推进性能。双喷射方案减少燃料消耗与小变化的净推力。双喷射方案中的平行喷射有利于实现爆轰主导燃烧,性能提升更为显著。该研究为旋转爆轰加力燃烧室的优化设计提供了有价值的见解和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace Science and Technology
Aerospace Science and Technology 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
28.60%
发文量
654
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Aerospace Science and Technology publishes articles of outstanding scientific quality. Each article is reviewed by two referees. The journal welcomes papers from a wide range of countries. This journal publishes original papers, review articles and short communications related to all fields of aerospace research, fundamental and applied, potential applications of which are clearly related to: • The design and the manufacture of aircraft, helicopters, missiles, launchers and satellites • The control of their environment • The study of various systems they are involved in, as supports or as targets. Authors are invited to submit papers on new advances in the following topics to aerospace applications: • Fluid dynamics • Energetics and propulsion • Materials and structures • Flight mechanics • Navigation, guidance and control • Acoustics • Optics • Electromagnetism and radar • Signal and image processing • Information processing • Data fusion • Decision aid • Human behaviour • Robotics and intelligent systems • Complex system engineering. Etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信