Reassessment of post-construction residual settlement of a bridge approach embankment using Bayesian back analysis

IF 5.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Shan Huang , Jinsong Huang , Merrick Jones , AHM Kamruzzaman , Richard Kelly , Stanley Yuen
{"title":"Reassessment of post-construction residual settlement of a bridge approach embankment using Bayesian back analysis","authors":"Shan Huang ,&nbsp;Jinsong Huang ,&nbsp;Merrick Jones ,&nbsp;AHM Kamruzzaman ,&nbsp;Richard Kelly ,&nbsp;Stanley Yuen","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As part of a highway upgrade project in northern New South Wales, Australia, a bridge was constructed over deep soft soils improved by preloading and prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs). Shortly after the bridge opened to traffic, the bridge approach slab settled beyond the serviceability limit. Although slab jacking was implemented, subsequent monitoring revealed settlement again exceeded the predicted upper bound, prompting a reassessment of long-term residual settlement and mitigation strategies. However, this reassessment is challenged by discontinuous monitoring data, instrumentation changes and uncertainty in settlement offsets. Early settlement measurements (May 2017 to February 2018) were taken away from the final embankment location due to a design-stage realignment that shifted the southern abutment. Monitoring was halted during abutment construction and resumed from July 2019. To overcome these challenges, a Bayesian back analysis framework was adopted to calibrate both dataset offsets and soil parameters. The analysis showed that using only the post-construction monitoring data provides the closest fit to the measurements and a reliable prediction of the ongoing settlement growth. The predicted residual settlement over the service life ranges from 306 to 444 mm, with an average value of 385 mm. Sensitivity analyses indicate that slight variations in fill unit weight, due to heavy compaction, and in soft soil thickness, influenced by bridge realignment, have limited impact on settlement predictions due to compensating effects within the Bayesian model. This study also demonstrates the value of probabilistic approaches for assessing long-term settlement under data discontinuities and soil uncertainty, providing insights for similar infrastructure projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101686"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391225002053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of a highway upgrade project in northern New South Wales, Australia, a bridge was constructed over deep soft soils improved by preloading and prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs). Shortly after the bridge opened to traffic, the bridge approach slab settled beyond the serviceability limit. Although slab jacking was implemented, subsequent monitoring revealed settlement again exceeded the predicted upper bound, prompting a reassessment of long-term residual settlement and mitigation strategies. However, this reassessment is challenged by discontinuous monitoring data, instrumentation changes and uncertainty in settlement offsets. Early settlement measurements (May 2017 to February 2018) were taken away from the final embankment location due to a design-stage realignment that shifted the southern abutment. Monitoring was halted during abutment construction and resumed from July 2019. To overcome these challenges, a Bayesian back analysis framework was adopted to calibrate both dataset offsets and soil parameters. The analysis showed that using only the post-construction monitoring data provides the closest fit to the measurements and a reliable prediction of the ongoing settlement growth. The predicted residual settlement over the service life ranges from 306 to 444 mm, with an average value of 385 mm. Sensitivity analyses indicate that slight variations in fill unit weight, due to heavy compaction, and in soft soil thickness, influenced by bridge realignment, have limited impact on settlement predictions due to compensating effects within the Bayesian model. This study also demonstrates the value of probabilistic approaches for assessing long-term settlement under data discontinuities and soil uncertainty, providing insights for similar infrastructure projects.
用贝叶斯反分析重新评价桥梁引路路堤施工后残余沉降
作为澳大利亚新南威尔士州北部高速公路升级项目的一部分,在通过预压和预制垂直排水沟(PVDs)改善的深层软土上建造了一座桥梁。大桥通车后不久,桥梁引桥板沉降超过了使用极限。虽然实施了顶板,但随后的监测显示沉降再次超过预测上限,促使对长期残余沉降和缓解策略进行重新评估。然而,这种重新评估受到不连续监测数据、仪器变化和沉降偏移的不确定性的挑战。早期沉降测量(2017年5月至2018年2月)被从最终路堤位置移除,因为设计阶段的重新调整改变了南桥台。监测在桥台施工期间暂停,并于2019年7月恢复。为了克服这些挑战,采用贝叶斯反分析框架对数据集偏移量和土壤参数进行校准。分析表明,仅使用施工后监测数据可以提供与测量结果最接近的数据,并且可以可靠地预测持续的沉降增长。预测残余沉降在306 ~ 444 mm之间,平均值为385 mm。敏感性分析表明,由于贝叶斯模型的补偿效应,由于重度压实导致的填土单位重量和受桥梁调整影响的软土厚度的微小变化对沉降预测的影响有限。该研究还证明了在数据不连续和土壤不确定性下评估长期沉降的概率方法的价值,为类似的基础设施项目提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Geotechnics
Transportation Geotechnics Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信