Quality of life assessment instruments used in clinical trials for alcohol use disorder: A systematic review

IF 1.9 0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jeppe Sig Juelsgaard Tryggedsson , Kjeld Andersen , Anette Søgaard Nielsen , Camilla Dahl Haislund Olsen , Angelina Isabella Mellentin
{"title":"Quality of life assessment instruments used in clinical trials for alcohol use disorder: A systematic review","authors":"Jeppe Sig Juelsgaard Tryggedsson ,&nbsp;Kjeld Andersen ,&nbsp;Anette Søgaard Nielsen ,&nbsp;Camilla Dahl Haislund Olsen ,&nbsp;Angelina Isabella Mellentin","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Quality of life (QoL) measures are increasingly used as outcome indicators in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological intervention trials for alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, there is no current and comprehensive review to inform standardization and utilization of psychometrically sound measures adapted to an AUD population. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify QoL assessment instruments used in clinical trials targeting AUD and provide an overview of the psychometric properties of the most frequently used instruments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO up to July 20th, 2023. Studies were included if they were original controlled trials assessing QoL in adults with AUD. Data extraction included study characteristics and details of QoL assessment instruments. Psychometric properties of frequently used instruments were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 3751 studies, 61 met inclusion criteria. Across these, 19 different QoL instruments were identified, with the SF-36 being the most frequently used. Our findings indicate that while several generic and health-related QoL instruments were employed, more than half of the instruments were applied in only one study, and generally few studies report on the psychometric properties specific to AUD populations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings underscore a lack of standardized practice and utilization of the most empirically sound QoL assessment instruments in clinical trials targeting AUD. This review provides an updated and more comprehensive synthesis than previous reviews, highlights the need for validated, AUD-specific QoL measures, and suggests directions for future research, including the development of core outcome sets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 209793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Quality of life (QoL) measures are increasingly used as outcome indicators in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological intervention trials for alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, there is no current and comprehensive review to inform standardization and utilization of psychometrically sound measures adapted to an AUD population. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify QoL assessment instruments used in clinical trials targeting AUD and provide an overview of the psychometric properties of the most frequently used instruments.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO up to July 20th, 2023. Studies were included if they were original controlled trials assessing QoL in adults with AUD. Data extraction included study characteristics and details of QoL assessment instruments. Psychometric properties of frequently used instruments were analyzed.

Results

Out of 3751 studies, 61 met inclusion criteria. Across these, 19 different QoL instruments were identified, with the SF-36 being the most frequently used. Our findings indicate that while several generic and health-related QoL instruments were employed, more than half of the instruments were applied in only one study, and generally few studies report on the psychometric properties specific to AUD populations.

Conclusions

The findings underscore a lack of standardized practice and utilization of the most empirically sound QoL assessment instruments in clinical trials targeting AUD. This review provides an updated and more comprehensive synthesis than previous reviews, highlights the need for validated, AUD-specific QoL measures, and suggests directions for future research, including the development of core outcome sets.
酒精使用障碍临床试验中使用的生活质量评估工具:系统综述
生活质量(QoL)测量越来越多地被用作酒精使用障碍(AUD)的药物和非药物干预试验的结果指标。然而,目前还没有一个全面的综述来为标准化和使用适合澳大利亚人群的心理测量学上健全的措施提供信息。因此,本系统综述旨在确定针对AUD的临床试验中使用的生活质量评估工具,并概述最常用工具的心理测量特性。方法系统检索截至2023年7月20日的PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO数据库。如果研究是评估成年AUD患者生活质量的原始对照试验,则纳入研究。数据提取包括研究特征和生活质量评估工具的详细信息。分析了常用仪器的心理测量特性。结果在3751项研究中,61项符合纳入标准。在这些中,确定了19种不同的生活质量仪器,其中SF-36是最常用的。我们的研究结果表明,虽然使用了几种通用的和与健康相关的生活质量工具,但超过一半的工具仅在一项研究中应用,并且通常很少有研究报告AUD人群特有的心理测量特性。结论:研究结果强调,在针对AUD的临床试验中,缺乏标准化的实践和最经验性可靠的生活质量评估工具的使用。这篇综述提供了一个比以前的综述更新和更全面的综合,强调需要验证的,aud特定的生活质量测量,并提出了未来的研究方向,包括核心结果集的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信