{"title":"Kinematic Limit Analysis of Roof Stability for Elliptical Tunnels in Rock Masses","authors":"Tae-Won Seo, Dowon Park","doi":"10.1002/nag.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Noncircular cross-sections are commonly encountered in engineering practice; however, primary attempts to analyze roof stability have focused on circular and rectangular configurations. This study investigates the roof stability of elliptical tunnels with varying aspect ratios, employing two semi-analytical approaches: piecewise linear and continuous analytical failure mechanisms. The former directly incorporates the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion, whereas the latter requires approximating its shear strength envelope through regression analysis. Notably, when the regression analysis achieved sufficient accuracy, the two approaches produced computationally consistent results (<1% difference), including closely aligned failure surface geometries. The findings demonstrate that the roof stability of elliptical tunnels—evaluated in terms of stability number, factor of safety, and support pressure—varies significantly from that of standard cross-sections. Considering the self-weight of a detached rock block as the primary cause of roof collapse, elliptical tunnels with a small horizontal-to-vertical axis ratio (i.e., a vertically elongated major axis) exhibit enhanced stability compared to circular tunnels. This improved stability is attributed to increased confining stress in the roof region and a reduced collapse block size. Furthermore, a comparative analysis encompassing various practical tunnel cross-sections, including horseshoe and mining configurations, provides a comprehensive understanding of roof stability across diverse geometric profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 16","pages":"3880-3896"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.70053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.70053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Noncircular cross-sections are commonly encountered in engineering practice; however, primary attempts to analyze roof stability have focused on circular and rectangular configurations. This study investigates the roof stability of elliptical tunnels with varying aspect ratios, employing two semi-analytical approaches: piecewise linear and continuous analytical failure mechanisms. The former directly incorporates the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion, whereas the latter requires approximating its shear strength envelope through regression analysis. Notably, when the regression analysis achieved sufficient accuracy, the two approaches produced computationally consistent results (<1% difference), including closely aligned failure surface geometries. The findings demonstrate that the roof stability of elliptical tunnels—evaluated in terms of stability number, factor of safety, and support pressure—varies significantly from that of standard cross-sections. Considering the self-weight of a detached rock block as the primary cause of roof collapse, elliptical tunnels with a small horizontal-to-vertical axis ratio (i.e., a vertically elongated major axis) exhibit enhanced stability compared to circular tunnels. This improved stability is attributed to increased confining stress in the roof region and a reduced collapse block size. Furthermore, a comparative analysis encompassing various practical tunnel cross-sections, including horseshoe and mining configurations, provides a comprehensive understanding of roof stability across diverse geometric profiles.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.