Robert C. Grant, Jiang Chen He, Ning Liu, Sho Podolsky, Faiyaz Notta, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Steven Gallinger, Andrea Knezevic, Sheron Latcha, Edgar Jaimes, Abhijat Kitchlu, Kelvin Chan
{"title":"Predicting Chronic Kidney Disease After Cisplatin Treatment Using Population-Level Data","authors":"Robert C. Grant, Jiang Chen He, Ning Liu, Sho Podolsky, Faiyaz Notta, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Steven Gallinger, Andrea Knezevic, Sheron Latcha, Edgar Jaimes, Abhijat Kitchlu, Kelvin Chan","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.2590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceCisplatin is a widely used treatment for cancer that can permanently damage the kidneys. Treatment modifications and other strategies may prevent chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients at risk; however, the incidence and predictability of CKD following cisplatin treatment remain poorly understood.ObjectiveTo characterize the incidence of CKD after cisplatin treatment and evaluate prediction models.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this population-based prognostic study, prediction models were developed based on a retrospective cohort study of patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy for nonhematologic cancer in an outpatient setting between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017. Models were tested on a temporal-test cohort of patients from Ontario, Canada, who started treatment between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, and an external-test cohort of patients from a single center in the United States. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2021 to May 7, 2025.ExposuresPredictive features included demographics, cancer diagnosis, cisplatin dose and schedule, comorbidities, laboratory testing, and patient-reported symptoms.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe outcomes were CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] &amp;lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and the eGFR after cisplatin treatment. Measures included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the mean absolute error (MAE).ResultsThe population-level cohort included 9521 patients (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-70 years]; 4841 men [50.8%]). Among the 9010 patients without pretreatment CKD, 1228 (13.6%) developed CKD, 81 (0.9%) developed grade 4 or worse CKD, and 16 (0.18%) required dialysis. The eGFR decreased by a mean of 8.1 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> (95% CI, 7.8-8.4 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>). A simple spline-based regression model based solely on the pretreatment eGFR predicted posttreatment CKD in the temporal-test cohort (area under the curve, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.78-0.82]) and the external-test cohort (area under the curve, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.78]). Similarly, the posttreatment eGFR was predicted by a spline regression based solely on the pretreatment eGFR (temporal-test MAE, 12.6 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> [95% CI, 12.3-13.0 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>]; external-test MAE, 14.3 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> [95% CI, 13.2-15.5 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>]). Complex machine learning systems incorporating all features failed to improve predictions over the univariable models.Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that cisplatin treatment was followed by a predictable decrease in the eGFR, placing patients with a lower baseline eGFR at the highest risk of CKD. A simple model based on the pretreatment eGFR predicts CKD risk and could guide clinical decision-making.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.2590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ImportanceCisplatin is a widely used treatment for cancer that can permanently damage the kidneys. Treatment modifications and other strategies may prevent chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients at risk; however, the incidence and predictability of CKD following cisplatin treatment remain poorly understood.ObjectiveTo characterize the incidence of CKD after cisplatin treatment and evaluate prediction models.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this population-based prognostic study, prediction models were developed based on a retrospective cohort study of patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy for nonhematologic cancer in an outpatient setting between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017. Models were tested on a temporal-test cohort of patients from Ontario, Canada, who started treatment between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, and an external-test cohort of patients from a single center in the United States. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2021 to May 7, 2025.ExposuresPredictive features included demographics, cancer diagnosis, cisplatin dose and schedule, comorbidities, laboratory testing, and patient-reported symptoms.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe outcomes were CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the eGFR after cisplatin treatment. Measures included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the mean absolute error (MAE).ResultsThe population-level cohort included 9521 patients (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-70 years]; 4841 men [50.8%]). Among the 9010 patients without pretreatment CKD, 1228 (13.6%) developed CKD, 81 (0.9%) developed grade 4 or worse CKD, and 16 (0.18%) required dialysis. The eGFR decreased by a mean of 8.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI, 7.8-8.4 mL/min/1.73 m2). A simple spline-based regression model based solely on the pretreatment eGFR predicted posttreatment CKD in the temporal-test cohort (area under the curve, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.78-0.82]) and the external-test cohort (area under the curve, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.78]). Similarly, the posttreatment eGFR was predicted by a spline regression based solely on the pretreatment eGFR (temporal-test MAE, 12.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI, 12.3-13.0 mL/min/1.73 m2]; external-test MAE, 14.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI, 13.2-15.5 mL/min/1.73 m2]). Complex machine learning systems incorporating all features failed to improve predictions over the univariable models.Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that cisplatin treatment was followed by a predictable decrease in the eGFR, placing patients with a lower baseline eGFR at the highest risk of CKD. A simple model based on the pretreatment eGFR predicts CKD risk and could guide clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Oncology is an international peer-reviewed journal that serves as the leading publication for scientists, clinicians, and trainees working in the field of oncology. It is part of the JAMA Network, a collection of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.