‘Stop torpedoing women's rights!’: Feminist institutional responses to anti-gender politics in Spain and Catalonia parliaments

IF 4.2 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
EMANUELA LOMBARDO, PALOMA CARAVANTES, SILVIA DÍAZ FERNÁNDEZ
{"title":"‘Stop torpedoing women's rights!’: Feminist institutional responses to anti-gender politics in Spain and Catalonia parliaments","authors":"EMANUELA LOMBARDO,&nbsp;PALOMA CARAVANTES,&nbsp;SILVIA DÍAZ FERNÁNDEZ","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Democracy and gender equality are increasingly contested in European parliamentary contexts, with the rise of political parties and movements that oppose feminist politics and the rights of women, LGBTI* and racialised people. Existing literature exploring far-right and anti-gender actors in institutional settings has focused on their discourse and impact on parliamentary politics and governments. Yet, limited attention has been paid to the feminist responses articulated in parliamentary contexts that face active opposition to gender and LGBTI* equality. This article addresses this gap by analysing feminist parliamentary responses to such opposition, and the factors that enable and constrain these responses, by undertaking a multi-level comparison between the Catalan Parliament (2021–2024) and the Spanish Parliament (2019–2023), based on content analysis of 21 parliamentary debates and 42 in-depth interviews.</p><p>We argue that the capacity of parliaments to respond to anti-gender, far-right opposition to gender, racial and LGBTI* equality is structured by macro-, meso- and micro-level enabling and constraining factors that include the state of democracy and its legacies, state structure, the constellation of anti-gender and pro-equality forces, the institutionalisation of equality, and the role of critical actors. By identifying a range of feminist strategies employed in the Spanish and Catalan parliamentary contexts – including ‘knowledge’, ‘coalition-building’, ‘rule-making’ and ‘everyday pragmatic engagement’ – this article contributes to developing the emerging scholarly field of feminist institutional responses to anti-gender politics, thereby advancing the theory of feminist institutionalism, state feminism and anti-gender politics in parliamentary contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"64 4","pages":"1693-1717"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.70005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Democracy and gender equality are increasingly contested in European parliamentary contexts, with the rise of political parties and movements that oppose feminist politics and the rights of women, LGBTI* and racialised people. Existing literature exploring far-right and anti-gender actors in institutional settings has focused on their discourse and impact on parliamentary politics and governments. Yet, limited attention has been paid to the feminist responses articulated in parliamentary contexts that face active opposition to gender and LGBTI* equality. This article addresses this gap by analysing feminist parliamentary responses to such opposition, and the factors that enable and constrain these responses, by undertaking a multi-level comparison between the Catalan Parliament (2021–2024) and the Spanish Parliament (2019–2023), based on content analysis of 21 parliamentary debates and 42 in-depth interviews.

We argue that the capacity of parliaments to respond to anti-gender, far-right opposition to gender, racial and LGBTI* equality is structured by macro-, meso- and micro-level enabling and constraining factors that include the state of democracy and its legacies, state structure, the constellation of anti-gender and pro-equality forces, the institutionalisation of equality, and the role of critical actors. By identifying a range of feminist strategies employed in the Spanish and Catalan parliamentary contexts – including ‘knowledge’, ‘coalition-building’, ‘rule-making’ and ‘everyday pragmatic engagement’ – this article contributes to developing the emerging scholarly field of feminist institutional responses to anti-gender politics, thereby advancing the theory of feminist institutionalism, state feminism and anti-gender politics in parliamentary contexts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

“停止破坏妇女权利!”:西班牙和加泰罗尼亚议会对反性别政治的女权主义制度回应
随着反对女权主义政治、反对女性、LGBTI*和种族化人群权利的政党和运动的兴起,民主和性别平等在欧洲议会中受到越来越多的争议。现有的研究机构中极右翼和反性别行为者的文献主要集中在他们的话语和对议会政治和政府的影响上。然而,很少有人关注女权主义者在议会背景下的回应,这些回应面临着对性别和LGBTI*平等的积极反对。本文通过对加泰罗尼亚议会(2021-2024年)和西班牙议会(2019-2023年)进行多层次比较,基于对21场议会辩论的内容分析和42次深度访谈,分析了女权主义者议会对这种反对的反应,以及促成和限制这些反应的因素,从而解决了这一差距。我们认为,议会应对反性别、极右翼反对性别、种族和LGBTI*平等的能力是由宏观、中观和微观层面的支持和制约因素构成的,这些因素包括民主国家及其遗产、国家结构、反性别和亲平等力量的集合、平等的制度化以及关键行动者的作用。通过确定在西班牙和加泰罗尼亚议会环境中使用的一系列女权主义策略-包括“知识”,“联盟建设”,“规则制定”和“日常实用主义参与”-本文有助于发展女权主义对反性别政治的制度反应的新兴学术领域,从而推进议会环境中的女权主义制度主义,国家女权主义和反性别政治理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信