Facilitators and Barriers to Successful Collaboration in Guideline Development: Experiential Insights of Collaborative Guideline Developers

Chatura Prematunge, Amanda Graham, Christina Ventura, Robyn Temple-Smolkin, Emma McFarlane, Aggie Bak, Pamela Ginex, Yasser Sami Amer, Michael Yi, Umer Nadir, Emily Senerth, Priya Jakhmola, Heba Hussein, Bright Huo, Rachel Christensen, Holger Schunemann, Murad Alam, Rebecca L. Morgan, Toju Ogunremi, on behalf of the Guidelines International Network Guidelines Collaboration Working Group
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers to Successful Collaboration in Guideline Development: Experiential Insights of Collaborative Guideline Developers","authors":"Chatura Prematunge,&nbsp;Amanda Graham,&nbsp;Christina Ventura,&nbsp;Robyn Temple-Smolkin,&nbsp;Emma McFarlane,&nbsp;Aggie Bak,&nbsp;Pamela Ginex,&nbsp;Yasser Sami Amer,&nbsp;Michael Yi,&nbsp;Umer Nadir,&nbsp;Emily Senerth,&nbsp;Priya Jakhmola,&nbsp;Heba Hussein,&nbsp;Bright Huo,&nbsp;Rachel Christensen,&nbsp;Holger Schunemann,&nbsp;Murad Alam,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Morgan,&nbsp;Toju Ogunremi,&nbsp;on behalf of the Guidelines International Network Guidelines Collaboration Working Group","doi":"10.1002/gin2.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The current study aimed to elucidate themes that contributed to successful and unsuccessful collaborative guideline development between organisations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design and Setting</h3>\n \n <p>The reporting of qualitative methods was checked against the Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. A purposive sampling approach was used to recruit participants with experience or affiliations in collaborative guideline development. Participants completed a pre-interview questionnaire and took part in semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were coded using inductive thematic analysis methodology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The thematic analysis of guideline developer interviews (<i>n</i> = 14) identified three interconnected theme sets and secondary sub-themes. Misalignment of collaboration purpose and scope, misalignment of guideline development methodologies, and perception that such collaborations require more time and effort were identified as barriers. Technologies and templates that support collaborative work, initial scoping and planning among collaborators, organisational guideline topic prioritisation work, culture of collaboration, and recognising collaboration benefits were identified as facilitators. Cross-cutting themes, which appeared to either enhance or hinder collaboration based on interviewee context, included past collaborative experiences, publication of completed work, and levels of knowledge and training among collaborators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This analysis demonstrated facilitators and barriers to collaborative guideline development are interconnected. Future research into collaborative guideline development should look towards validating these findings in a more geographically diverse sample and investigate the mechanisms through which barrier, facilitator and cross-cutting themes contribute to guideline collaboration between organisations. Further understanding of factors that can impede or expedite successful collaboration provide opportunities to identify effective strategies for overcoming perceived barriers to collaboration. Findings from this study can be used to bolster collaborative efforts by encouraging alignment in processes, methodology, and expectations, as well as promoting collective knowledge and resource sharing between collaborators within different guideline development organisations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100266,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The current study aimed to elucidate themes that contributed to successful and unsuccessful collaborative guideline development between organisations.

Study Design and Setting

The reporting of qualitative methods was checked against the Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. A purposive sampling approach was used to recruit participants with experience or affiliations in collaborative guideline development. Participants completed a pre-interview questionnaire and took part in semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were coded using inductive thematic analysis methodology.

Results

The thematic analysis of guideline developer interviews (n = 14) identified three interconnected theme sets and secondary sub-themes. Misalignment of collaboration purpose and scope, misalignment of guideline development methodologies, and perception that such collaborations require more time and effort were identified as barriers. Technologies and templates that support collaborative work, initial scoping and planning among collaborators, organisational guideline topic prioritisation work, culture of collaboration, and recognising collaboration benefits were identified as facilitators. Cross-cutting themes, which appeared to either enhance or hinder collaboration based on interviewee context, included past collaborative experiences, publication of completed work, and levels of knowledge and training among collaborators.

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrated facilitators and barriers to collaborative guideline development are interconnected. Future research into collaborative guideline development should look towards validating these findings in a more geographically diverse sample and investigate the mechanisms through which barrier, facilitator and cross-cutting themes contribute to guideline collaboration between organisations. Further understanding of factors that can impede or expedite successful collaboration provide opportunities to identify effective strategies for overcoming perceived barriers to collaboration. Findings from this study can be used to bolster collaborative efforts by encouraging alignment in processes, methodology, and expectations, as well as promoting collective knowledge and resource sharing between collaborators within different guideline development organisations.

Abstract Image

指南制定中成功协作的促进因素和障碍:协作指南开发者的经验洞察
目的本研究旨在阐明组织间合作指南制定成功与不成功的因素。研究设计和设置根据定性研究报告综合标准(COREQ)检查表对定性方法的报告进行检查。采用有目的的抽样方法来招募具有合作指南制定经验或隶属关系的参与者。参与者完成了一份访谈前问卷,并参加了半结构化访谈。访谈记录采用归纳主题分析方法进行编码。结果14名指南制定者访谈的主题分析确定了三个相互关联的主题集和次要子主题。协作目的和范围的不一致,指导方针开发方法的不一致,以及这种协作需要更多时间和努力的认识被确定为障碍。支持协作工作的技术和模板、合作者之间的初始范围和规划、组织指南主题优先级工作、协作文化和识别协作利益被确定为促进因素。交叉主题,似乎是基于受访者的背景来促进或阻碍合作,包括过去的合作经验,完成工作的出版,以及合作者之间的知识水平和培训。结论:该分析表明,协作指南制定的促进因素和障碍是相互关联的。未来对协作指南制定的研究应该着眼于在更地理多样化的样本中验证这些发现,并调查障碍、促进者和跨领域主题促进组织间指南合作的机制。进一步了解可能阻碍或加速成功协作的因素,为确定克服协作障碍的有效策略提供了机会。本研究的发现可以通过鼓励过程、方法和期望的一致性,以及促进不同指南制定组织内合作者之间的集体知识和资源共享,来支持协作努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书