Who accepts party policy change? The individual-level drivers of attitudes towards party repositioning

IF 4.2 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
MAURITS J. MEIJERS, RUTH DASSONNEVILLE
{"title":"Who accepts party policy change? The individual-level drivers of attitudes towards party repositioning","authors":"MAURITS J. MEIJERS,&nbsp;RUTH DASSONNEVILLE","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Experimental research has shown that political parties often, but not always, suffer reputational costs when they change their policy positions. Yet, it is not clear who accepts and who rejects party policy change. Using newly collected observational data from five European countries (Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom), we examine the individual-level determinants of party policy change. We examine support for policy change with a new survey item that directly captures party policy change acceptance. We theorise that acceptance of party policy change varies as a function of individuals' political attitudes such as their level of interest in politics and their ideological positions, as well as their views about democratic decision-making. Although we find that many citizens agree that change is sometimes necessary and understand the conditions and constraints that lead parties to alter their positions, we also show that populist attitudes have a strong negative effect on accepting party policy change. A textual analysis of an open-ended survey item furthermore indicates that those who perceive party policy change negatively, associate change with opportunism and power-seeking. Our results imply that even though parties have some leeway to change their positions when external conditions require them to do so, populist beliefs and anti-elite sentiment make citizens rather sceptical of the motivations that parties have when they alter their positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"64 4","pages":"1668-1692"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.70001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experimental research has shown that political parties often, but not always, suffer reputational costs when they change their policy positions. Yet, it is not clear who accepts and who rejects party policy change. Using newly collected observational data from five European countries (Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom), we examine the individual-level determinants of party policy change. We examine support for policy change with a new survey item that directly captures party policy change acceptance. We theorise that acceptance of party policy change varies as a function of individuals' political attitudes such as their level of interest in politics and their ideological positions, as well as their views about democratic decision-making. Although we find that many citizens agree that change is sometimes necessary and understand the conditions and constraints that lead parties to alter their positions, we also show that populist attitudes have a strong negative effect on accepting party policy change. A textual analysis of an open-ended survey item furthermore indicates that those who perceive party policy change negatively, associate change with opportunism and power-seeking. Our results imply that even though parties have some leeway to change their positions when external conditions require them to do so, populist beliefs and anti-elite sentiment make citizens rather sceptical of the motivations that parties have when they alter their positions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

谁会接受党的政策改变?对政党重新定位态度的个人层面驱动因素
实验研究表明,政党在改变政策立场时,往往(但并非总是)会蒙受声誉损失。然而,目前还不清楚谁会接受,谁会反对党的政策变化。利用新收集的来自五个欧洲国家(德国、荷兰、波兰、西班牙和英国)的观测数据,我们研究了政党政策变化的个人层面决定因素。我们通过一个新的调查项目来检查对政策变化的支持,该项目直接捕获了政党对政策变化的接受程度。我们的理论是,对政党政策变化的接受程度因个人的政治态度而异,比如他们对政治的兴趣程度和意识形态立场,以及他们对民主决策的看法。虽然我们发现许多公民同意改变有时是必要的,并且理解导致政党改变立场的条件和限制,但我们也表明,民粹主义态度对接受政党政策改变有很强的负面影响。对开放式调查项目的文本分析进一步表明,那些对政党政策变化持负面看法的人将变化与机会主义和权力寻求联系在一起。我们的研究结果表明,即使政党在外部条件要求的情况下有改变立场的余地,但民粹主义信仰和反精英情绪使公民对政党改变立场的动机持怀疑态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信