What Factors Could Create a More Comfortable Waiting Experience for Patients on Emergency Department Ramps? A Scoping Review

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Vicki Binnie, Robert Eley, Andrew Staib
{"title":"What Factors Could Create a More Comfortable Waiting Experience for Patients on Emergency Department Ramps? A Scoping Review","authors":"Vicki Binnie,&nbsp;Robert Eley,&nbsp;Andrew Staib","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ambulance ramping is the situation where patients who arrive by ambulance are forced to queue for access to an emergency department (ED) cubicle. Despite efforts to address the problem of ambulance ramping, it continues to present a ubiquitous challenge for health services. While facility guidelines consider general healthcare and ED environments, evidence is lacking regarding necessary requirements to provide patient-centred care within the ramp environment. This scoping review identifies current research regarding characteristics of waiting environments that provide better experiences for consumers that may be transferable to the ambulance ramp. It utilises sources from both health and non-health literature to support outcomes. A systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted, reference chaining was undertaken, and grey literature was searched. Levels of evidence were assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. No study was found that specifically addressed the spatial layout of the ED ramp environment in relation to patient experience. Fifty-nine papers were included in the review. Papers underwent an inter-rater assessment regarding translatability of the outcomes to the ramp environment, including perceived complexity and cost. Outcomes with high inter-rater agreement were then discussed according to the domains of psychological, self-efficacy, social and functional. Elements categorised within these domains include privacy, availability of external views and natural elements, proximity of staff and communication, aspects of the physical environment, elements of hospitality, preferred furniture and environmental temperature. This review identifies environmental elements that may support person-centred care while on the ED ramp and informs future facility planning.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ambulance ramping is the situation where patients who arrive by ambulance are forced to queue for access to an emergency department (ED) cubicle. Despite efforts to address the problem of ambulance ramping, it continues to present a ubiquitous challenge for health services. While facility guidelines consider general healthcare and ED environments, evidence is lacking regarding necessary requirements to provide patient-centred care within the ramp environment. This scoping review identifies current research regarding characteristics of waiting environments that provide better experiences for consumers that may be transferable to the ambulance ramp. It utilises sources from both health and non-health literature to support outcomes. A systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted, reference chaining was undertaken, and grey literature was searched. Levels of evidence were assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. No study was found that specifically addressed the spatial layout of the ED ramp environment in relation to patient experience. Fifty-nine papers were included in the review. Papers underwent an inter-rater assessment regarding translatability of the outcomes to the ramp environment, including perceived complexity and cost. Outcomes with high inter-rater agreement were then discussed according to the domains of psychological, self-efficacy, social and functional. Elements categorised within these domains include privacy, availability of external views and natural elements, proximity of staff and communication, aspects of the physical environment, elements of hospitality, preferred furniture and environmental temperature. This review identifies environmental elements that may support person-centred care while on the ED ramp and informs future facility planning.

哪些因素可以为急诊科匝道上的患者创造更舒适的等待体验?范围检讨
救护车匝道是指乘坐救护车到达的病人被迫排队进入急诊科(ED)的情况。尽管努力解决救护车拥挤的问题,但这仍然是保健服务普遍面临的挑战。虽然设施指南考虑了一般医疗保健和急诊科环境,但缺乏关于在斜坡环境中提供以患者为中心的护理的必要要求的证据。本综述确定了当前关于等待环境特征的研究,这些特征为消费者提供了更好的体验,可以转移到救护车坡道。它利用来自卫生和非卫生文献的来源来支持结果。系统检索5个电子数据库,进行文献链接,检索灰色文献。使用混合方法评估工具评估证据水平。没有研究发现专门针对急诊科斜坡环境的空间布局与患者体验的关系。本次综述共收录了59篇论文。论文对结果在斜坡环境中的可译性进行了内部评估,包括感知到的复杂性和成本。然后根据心理、自我效能、社会和功能领域讨论高一致性结果。在这些领域中分类的要素包括隐私、外部景观和自然元素的可用性、工作人员和通信的接近性、物理环境的各个方面、热情好客的要素、首选家具和环境温度。该审查确定了在急诊科斜坡上可能支持以人为本的护理的环境因素,并为未来的设施规划提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信