Building capacity for health research in higher education: Evaluating readiness for research and scholarship

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Kelly A. Laurila , Katharine Sanderson , Taylor S. Lane , Diane Stearns , Derrick C. Tabor , Julie A. Baldwin
{"title":"Building capacity for health research in higher education: Evaluating readiness for research and scholarship","authors":"Kelly A. Laurila ,&nbsp;Katharine Sanderson ,&nbsp;Taylor S. Lane ,&nbsp;Diane Stearns ,&nbsp;Derrick C. Tabor ,&nbsp;Julie A. Baldwin","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This case study examines key components of research readiness for Doctoral Universities with High Research Activity (R2) through the lens of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) program. While there are long-standing systems in place for ranking research institutions based on grant expenditures, there is a need to establish methods to evaluate institutions’ readiness for externally funded competitive research. Drawing on literature across multiple disciplines and framed in alignment with the RCMI program goals, the authors developed a multidimensional instrument to examine research readiness centered on two primary domains (investigator and institutional readiness). The largest barriers to proposal development and conducting research/scholarship projects were managing time for competing expectations including scholarship, teaching, mentoring students, and service and recruiting skilled students who are prepared to assist the research process (respectively). Building research capacity requires research infrastructure, equitable distribution of institutional and grant resources, protected time for research, and focused areas research. Findings inform evaluation methods to assess research readiness, identify indicators and set benchmarks to measure changes in capacity and offer strategies for universities to enhance research capacity-building efforts and optimize institutions’ ability to conduct NIH mission relevant research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case study examines key components of research readiness for Doctoral Universities with High Research Activity (R2) through the lens of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) program. While there are long-standing systems in place for ranking research institutions based on grant expenditures, there is a need to establish methods to evaluate institutions’ readiness for externally funded competitive research. Drawing on literature across multiple disciplines and framed in alignment with the RCMI program goals, the authors developed a multidimensional instrument to examine research readiness centered on two primary domains (investigator and institutional readiness). The largest barriers to proposal development and conducting research/scholarship projects were managing time for competing expectations including scholarship, teaching, mentoring students, and service and recruiting skilled students who are prepared to assist the research process (respectively). Building research capacity requires research infrastructure, equitable distribution of institutional and grant resources, protected time for research, and focused areas research. Findings inform evaluation methods to assess research readiness, identify indicators and set benchmarks to measure changes in capacity and offer strategies for universities to enhance research capacity-building efforts and optimize institutions’ ability to conduct NIH mission relevant research.
高等教育卫生研究能力建设:评估研究和奖学金的准备情况
本案例研究通过美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的少数民族机构研究中心(RCMI)项目,考察了具有高研究活动(R2)的博士大学的研究准备的关键组成部分。虽然长期以来存在根据资助支出对研究机构进行排名的制度,但有必要建立方法来评估机构对外部资助的竞争性研究的准备情况。借鉴跨多个学科的文献,并与RCMI项目目标保持一致,作者开发了一个多维工具,以两个主要领域(研究者和机构准备)为中心检查研究准备情况。提案开发和开展研究/奖学金项目的最大障碍是管理时间,以满足各种期望,包括奖学金、教学、指导学生、服务和招募准备协助研究过程的熟练学生(分别)。建设研究能力需要研究基础设施、公平分配机构和资助资源、保护研究时间以及重点研究领域。研究结果为评估研究准备程度、确定指标和设定基准以衡量能力变化的评估方法提供了信息,并为大学加强研究能力建设努力和优化机构开展NIH任务相关研究的能力提供了策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信