Mapping the landscape of cybersecurity preparedness: A systematic review of non-technological determinants and consequences

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Songkhun Nillasithanukroh , Chul Hyun Park , Jaejong Baek , Gail-Joon Ahn , Robert Richards
{"title":"Mapping the landscape of cybersecurity preparedness: A systematic review of non-technological determinants and consequences","authors":"Songkhun Nillasithanukroh ,&nbsp;Chul Hyun Park ,&nbsp;Jaejong Baek ,&nbsp;Gail-Joon Ahn ,&nbsp;Robert Richards","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the escalating technological reliance of organizations, the development of robust cybersecurity preparedness has become imperative to preempt and mitigate the spectrum of cyber threats that jeopardize operational integrity, data security, and reputational standing. Constructing an effective defense, however, remains challenging due to the prevailing tendency of existing cybersecurity preparedness assessment frameworks to prioritize technological solutions, often downplaying the critical roles of human, organizational, and environmental factors. Moreover, such frameworks frequently overlook the complex interplay among these domains and the full spectrum of consequential outcomes. This systematic literature review seeks to address these gaps by synthesizing empirical findings from a broad corpus of academic literature. The review elucidates the multifaceted determinants of cybersecurity preparedness, with particular emphasis on underexplored non-technological variables, and explicates the mechanisms by which these factors interrelate and ultimately influence preparedness outcomes. While the findings underscore the substantial impact of human, organizational, and environmental factors—often engaging in complex interactions with other variables—extant empirical research on these interdependencies remains limited. As a result, future research employing integrative frameworks is warranted to more comprehensively capture the dynamic interplay of determinants shaping cybersecurity preparedness. Further investigation is also necessary to delineate the range of long-term consequences of preparedness, thereby better informing organizations about the comprehensive value of cybersecurity investments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103042"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the escalating technological reliance of organizations, the development of robust cybersecurity preparedness has become imperative to preempt and mitigate the spectrum of cyber threats that jeopardize operational integrity, data security, and reputational standing. Constructing an effective defense, however, remains challenging due to the prevailing tendency of existing cybersecurity preparedness assessment frameworks to prioritize technological solutions, often downplaying the critical roles of human, organizational, and environmental factors. Moreover, such frameworks frequently overlook the complex interplay among these domains and the full spectrum of consequential outcomes. This systematic literature review seeks to address these gaps by synthesizing empirical findings from a broad corpus of academic literature. The review elucidates the multifaceted determinants of cybersecurity preparedness, with particular emphasis on underexplored non-technological variables, and explicates the mechanisms by which these factors interrelate and ultimately influence preparedness outcomes. While the findings underscore the substantial impact of human, organizational, and environmental factors—often engaging in complex interactions with other variables—extant empirical research on these interdependencies remains limited. As a result, future research employing integrative frameworks is warranted to more comprehensively capture the dynamic interplay of determinants shaping cybersecurity preparedness. Further investigation is also necessary to delineate the range of long-term consequences of preparedness, thereby better informing organizations about the comprehensive value of cybersecurity investments.
绘制网络安全准备的景观:对非技术决定因素和后果的系统回顾
鉴于企业对技术的依赖不断升级,强大的网络安全准备的发展已成为当务之急,以先发制人并减轻危及运营完整性、数据安全和声誉的各种网络威胁。然而,由于现有网络安全准备评估框架普遍倾向于优先考虑技术解决方案,往往低估了人、组织和环境因素的关键作用,因此构建有效的防御仍然具有挑战性。此外,这样的框架经常忽略了这些领域之间复杂的相互作用以及后果的全部范围。这个系统的文献综述试图通过综合广泛的学术文献的实证研究结果来解决这些差距。该综述阐明了网络安全准备的多方面决定因素,特别强调了未充分探索的非技术变量,并阐明了这些因素相互关联并最终影响准备结果的机制。虽然研究结果强调了人类、组织和环境因素的重大影响——经常与其他变量进行复杂的相互作用——但现有的关于这些相互依赖关系的实证研究仍然有限。因此,采用综合框架的未来研究有必要更全面地捕捉影响网络安全准备的决定因素的动态相互作用。进一步的调查也有必要描述准备的长期后果范围,从而更好地告知组织网络安全投资的综合价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信