Susanne Bolte, Johannes Klackl, Jochim Hansen, Eva Jonas, Isabella Uhl-Hädicke
{"title":"No cool dudes in Austria: Determinants of Austrian climate change skepticism","authors":"Susanne Bolte, Johannes Klackl, Jochim Hansen, Eva Jonas, Isabella Uhl-Hädicke","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the United States, conservative white men are demonstrably more skeptical about climate change than other adults, earning them the label “Cool Dudes.” Cool Dudes who self-reported understand climate change very well (i.e., high subjective climate literacy) are particularly skeptical about it. We investigated the existence of a similar effect in Austria using a representative survey study (<em>N</em> = 2185). We measured and regressed climate change skepticism on participants' gender, age, education, political orientation, self-reported knowledge of climate change, and subjective climate literacy. We found no evidence of a Cool Dude-like pattern in Austria. Men were not significantly more climate-skeptical than women, regardless of their political orientation. Nevertheless, climate skeptics were older, more conservative, and less educated and more often stated that they were not well-informed about climate change. High subjective climate literacy was associated with higher skepticism about climate change among conservatives yet lower skepticism among liberals. High subjective climate literacy was also associated with higher skepticism among those not informed about climate change. These results underline the importance of political orientation, information seeking, and subjective climate literacy, but not gender, for predicting climate change skepticism in Austria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102733"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002166","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the United States, conservative white men are demonstrably more skeptical about climate change than other adults, earning them the label “Cool Dudes.” Cool Dudes who self-reported understand climate change very well (i.e., high subjective climate literacy) are particularly skeptical about it. We investigated the existence of a similar effect in Austria using a representative survey study (N = 2185). We measured and regressed climate change skepticism on participants' gender, age, education, political orientation, self-reported knowledge of climate change, and subjective climate literacy. We found no evidence of a Cool Dude-like pattern in Austria. Men were not significantly more climate-skeptical than women, regardless of their political orientation. Nevertheless, climate skeptics were older, more conservative, and less educated and more often stated that they were not well-informed about climate change. High subjective climate literacy was associated with higher skepticism about climate change among conservatives yet lower skepticism among liberals. High subjective climate literacy was also associated with higher skepticism among those not informed about climate change. These results underline the importance of political orientation, information seeking, and subjective climate literacy, but not gender, for predicting climate change skepticism in Austria.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space