Dosimetric feasibility of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Lena Kaestner , Jingyang Xie , Hannah Fanslau , Kerstin Siebenlist , Miriam Eckl , Hans Oppitz , Jens Fleckenstein , Daniel Buergy , Mustafa Kuru , Jürgen Kuschyk , Daniel Dürschmied , Mathieu Kruska , David Krug , Frank A. Giordano , Achim Schweikard , Oliver Blanck , Boris Rudic , Judit Boda-Heggemann
{"title":"Dosimetric feasibility of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator","authors":"Lena Kaestner , Jingyang Xie , Hannah Fanslau , Kerstin Siebenlist , Miriam Eckl , Hans Oppitz , Jens Fleckenstein , Daniel Buergy , Mustafa Kuru , Jürgen Kuschyk , Daniel Dürschmied , Mathieu Kruska , David Krug , Frank A. Giordano , Achim Schweikard , Oliver Blanck , Boris Rudic , Judit Boda-Heggemann","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) are increasingly used to prevent sudden cardiac death. Due to their placement near the left lateral and apical myocardium, S-ICDs can present technical challenges for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) of ventricular tachycardia. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of STAR in patients with S-ICDs.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Previously acquired cardiac computed tomography data from ten S-ICD patients were retrospectively analyzed. Organs at risk, S-ICD components, and hypothetical planning target volumes (PTV) for segments 8 (septal), 11 (lateral), and 17 (apical) were contoured. For each patient and segment, two treatment plans were calculated with a prescribed PTV dose of 25 Gy: one plan sparing the S-ICD from the primary radiotherapy beam (‘spared’) and one without this constraint (‘non-spared’).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The S-ICD was successfully spared from the primary beam in 27 out of 30 plans, with <em>D</em><sub>0.035cm</sub><sup>3</sup> < 1 Gy. In three spared plans (PTV segment 11) with a distance between PTV and S-ICD <4 cm, <em>D</em><sub>0.035cm</sub><sup>3</sup> exceeded 1 Gy. Spared plans for PTV segment 11 showed significant higher dose/volume metrics and reduced plan quality compared to non-spared plans (p < 0.05), although 9/10 plans remained clinically acceptable. For PTV segment 8 and segment 17, no clinical or statistical differences were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The presence of an S-ICD is not a contraindication for STAR, although plan quality may decrease with PTVs in lateral segments. Rare cases with a distance between PTV and S-ICD <4 cm may complicate radiation treatment planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100827"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625001320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) are increasingly used to prevent sudden cardiac death. Due to their placement near the left lateral and apical myocardium, S-ICDs can present technical challenges for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) of ventricular tachycardia. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of STAR in patients with S-ICDs.
Materials and methods
Previously acquired cardiac computed tomography data from ten S-ICD patients were retrospectively analyzed. Organs at risk, S-ICD components, and hypothetical planning target volumes (PTV) for segments 8 (septal), 11 (lateral), and 17 (apical) were contoured. For each patient and segment, two treatment plans were calculated with a prescribed PTV dose of 25 Gy: one plan sparing the S-ICD from the primary radiotherapy beam (‘spared’) and one without this constraint (‘non-spared’).
Results
The S-ICD was successfully spared from the primary beam in 27 out of 30 plans, with D0.035cm3 < 1 Gy. In three spared plans (PTV segment 11) with a distance between PTV and S-ICD <4 cm, D0.035cm3 exceeded 1 Gy. Spared plans for PTV segment 11 showed significant higher dose/volume metrics and reduced plan quality compared to non-spared plans (p < 0.05), although 9/10 plans remained clinically acceptable. For PTV segment 8 and segment 17, no clinical or statistical differences were observed.
Conclusions
The presence of an S-ICD is not a contraindication for STAR, although plan quality may decrease with PTVs in lateral segments. Rare cases with a distance between PTV and S-ICD <4 cm may complicate radiation treatment planning.