Culturally adapting family interventions for people with schizophrenia in Indonesia: An intervention development study using programme theory

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Laoise Renwick , Herni Susanti , Budi-anna Keliat , Dewi Wulandari , Suherman , Rizqy Fadilah , Raphita Diorarta , Helen Brooks , Penny Bee , Karina Lovell
{"title":"Culturally adapting family interventions for people with schizophrenia in Indonesia: An intervention development study using programme theory","authors":"Laoise Renwick ,&nbsp;Herni Susanti ,&nbsp;Budi-anna Keliat ,&nbsp;Dewi Wulandari ,&nbsp;Suherman ,&nbsp;Rizqy Fadilah ,&nbsp;Raphita Diorarta ,&nbsp;Helen Brooks ,&nbsp;Penny Bee ,&nbsp;Karina Lovell","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Schizophrenia is a leading cause of disability and global burden worldwide. Low- and middle-income settings are disproportionately affected, and evidence-based, psychosocial interventions are largely unavailable, undeveloped and under-researched for this population. Family interventions have a particularly strong evidence base for reducing relapse risk with medium to large effect sizes. World Health Organisation international clinical guidelines, recommend family interventions as an essential intervention in these settings. Despite this, evidence is emerging that family interventions can deliver positive outcomes in these settings and there are few studies examining the suitability and effectiveness of delivering these in settings with varied socio-economic climates and cultural differences.</div><div>We used the Medical Research Council Framework for Developing Complex Interventions, conducting a series of separate but interrelated studies to adapt a testable, evidence-based, culturally relevant family intervention for people with schizophrenia and their families in Indonesia. Our theory driven approach utilises an existing heuristic model to explore stakeholder (service-users, caregivers and healthcare professionals; n = 51) preferences and priorities about family interventions and qualitative interviews with key informants (n = 14) exploring implementation related facilitators and barriers that affect the utility and ecological validity of these interventions. We used a modified nominal group technique to allow divergent ideas to be expressed and collated identifying areas of consensus regarding the optimal content, format and delivery of family interventions.</div><div>Our theory of change outlines that while family interventions primarily target relapse, they may also influence broader outcomes like quality of life, functioning, and social inclusion, though not solely responsible for changes in these areas. Therapist confidence depends on training, supervision, and understanding family needs. Intervention components, based on mechanisms of change and stakeholder preferences, align with empirical and theoretical evidence including psychoeducation, communication skills, and relapse prevention. Addressing maladaptive beliefs about schizophrenia, such as hopelessness and blame, was theorised to foster recovery and reduce stigma, a key stakeholder concern.</div><div>This theory of change will aid the design of our evaluation, and guide local implementation strategies, inform the development of data collection protocols, and provide a framework for interpreting results. This provides an opportunity to engage stakeholders actively incorporating their perspectives and knowledge into the planning process of the intervention and its implementation, ensuring engagement with policy makers to secure knowledge mobilisation, buy-in and partnership working.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25001146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a leading cause of disability and global burden worldwide. Low- and middle-income settings are disproportionately affected, and evidence-based, psychosocial interventions are largely unavailable, undeveloped and under-researched for this population. Family interventions have a particularly strong evidence base for reducing relapse risk with medium to large effect sizes. World Health Organisation international clinical guidelines, recommend family interventions as an essential intervention in these settings. Despite this, evidence is emerging that family interventions can deliver positive outcomes in these settings and there are few studies examining the suitability and effectiveness of delivering these in settings with varied socio-economic climates and cultural differences.
We used the Medical Research Council Framework for Developing Complex Interventions, conducting a series of separate but interrelated studies to adapt a testable, evidence-based, culturally relevant family intervention for people with schizophrenia and their families in Indonesia. Our theory driven approach utilises an existing heuristic model to explore stakeholder (service-users, caregivers and healthcare professionals; n = 51) preferences and priorities about family interventions and qualitative interviews with key informants (n = 14) exploring implementation related facilitators and barriers that affect the utility and ecological validity of these interventions. We used a modified nominal group technique to allow divergent ideas to be expressed and collated identifying areas of consensus regarding the optimal content, format and delivery of family interventions.
Our theory of change outlines that while family interventions primarily target relapse, they may also influence broader outcomes like quality of life, functioning, and social inclusion, though not solely responsible for changes in these areas. Therapist confidence depends on training, supervision, and understanding family needs. Intervention components, based on mechanisms of change and stakeholder preferences, align with empirical and theoretical evidence including psychoeducation, communication skills, and relapse prevention. Addressing maladaptive beliefs about schizophrenia, such as hopelessness and blame, was theorised to foster recovery and reduce stigma, a key stakeholder concern.
This theory of change will aid the design of our evaluation, and guide local implementation strategies, inform the development of data collection protocols, and provide a framework for interpreting results. This provides an opportunity to engage stakeholders actively incorporating their perspectives and knowledge into the planning process of the intervention and its implementation, ensuring engagement with policy makers to secure knowledge mobilisation, buy-in and partnership working.
印尼精神分裂症患者的文化适应性家庭干预:一项使用程序理论的干预发展研究
精神分裂症是世界范围内导致残疾和全球负担的主要原因。低收入和中等收入环境受到的影响尤为严重,针对这一人群的基于证据的社会心理干预措施在很大程度上是不可用的、不发达的和研究不足的。家庭干预在降低复发风险方面具有特别有力的证据基础,具有中等到较大的效应量。世界卫生组织国际临床指南建议,在这些情况下,家庭干预是必不可少的干预措施。尽管如此,越来越多的证据表明,家庭干预可以在这些环境中产生积极的结果,而且很少有研究检查在不同社会经济气候和文化差异的环境中提供这些干预的适用性和有效性。我们使用了医学研究委员会制定复杂干预措施框架,开展了一系列独立但相互关联的研究,以适应印度尼西亚精神分裂症患者及其家庭的可测试、循证、文化相关的家庭干预措施。我们的理论驱动方法利用现有的启发式模型来探索利益相关者(服务使用者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员;n = 51)对家庭干预措施的偏好和优先级,并与关键举报人(n = 14)进行定性访谈,探索影响这些干预措施效用和生态有效性的实施相关促进因素和障碍。我们使用了一种改良的名义小组技术,允许不同的想法得到表达和整理,以确定关于家庭干预的最佳内容、格式和交付的共识领域。我们的改变理论概述,虽然家庭干预主要针对复发,但它们也可能影响更广泛的结果,如生活质量、功能和社会包容,尽管不是这些领域变化的唯一原因。治疗师的信心依赖于培训、监督和对家庭需求的理解。基于变化机制和利益相关者偏好的干预成分,与包括心理教育、沟通技巧和复发预防在内的经验和理论证据保持一致。从理论上讲,解决有关精神分裂症的不适应信念,如绝望和指责,是为了促进康复和减少耻辱,这是利益相关者关注的一个关键问题。这种变化理论将有助于我们的评估设计,指导当地的实施策略,为数据收集协议的发展提供信息,并为解释结果提供框架。这提供了一个机会,让利益攸关方积极参与,将他们的观点和知识纳入干预措施及其实施的规划过程,确保与政策制定者的参与,以确保知识动员、支持和伙伴关系的运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信