Does Fencing Protect Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Diversity in Temporary Ponds Within a Livestock-Grazed, Semi-Arid Landscape?

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Thethela Bokhutlo, Lesedi Botsile, Richard Mazebedi, Belda Mosepele, Kirk O. Winemiller
{"title":"Does Fencing Protect Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Diversity in Temporary Ponds Within a Livestock-Grazed, Semi-Arid Landscape?","authors":"Thethela Bokhutlo,&nbsp;Lesedi Botsile,&nbsp;Richard Mazebedi,&nbsp;Belda Mosepele,&nbsp;Kirk O. Winemiller","doi":"10.1111/aje.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Protecting the diversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates in ponds requires maintaining their habitat integrity. In areas with livestock grazing, fencing ponds effectively protects aquatic vegetation from grazing and prevents livestock from trampling. In this study, we investigated how fencing affects both <i>α</i>-diversity (species richness and diversity within a pond) and <i>β</i>-diversity (species turnover between ponds) by sampling macroinvertebrates and environmental variables from 10 temporary ponds near Palapye, central Botswana. Among these, six ponds were unfenced, and four were fenced. To ensure accurate comparisons, we rarefied species richness and estimated diversity using Hill numbers. We calculated both incidence and abundance-based <i>β</i>-diversity indices. We analysed the relationship between environmental variables and macroinvertebrate communities using redundancy analysis and employed variation partitioning to determine the influence of environmental and distance-related factors on macroinvertebrate variability. Our results showed that fenced ponds exhibited significantly higher Shannon diversity, Simpson diversity and species richness compared to unfenced ponds. Conversely, unfenced ponds experienced greater taxa turnover, while fenced ponds displayed higher abundance-based nestedness. Variation partitioning revealed that environmental factors primarily drove macroinvertebrate variability. These findings support fencing as an effective management strategy to protect macroinvertebrate diversity in temporary ponds within semi-arid, livestock-grazed landscapes. Although fencing enhances <i>α</i>-diversity, it is unnecessary to fence all ponds to maintain <i>β</i>-diversity. The increased nestedness in fenced ponds indicates that macroinvertebrate taxa respond sensitively to habitat disturbances, highlighting the importance of preserving the integrity of fenced ponds to support higher <i>α</i>-diversity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":"63 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.70093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protecting the diversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates in ponds requires maintaining their habitat integrity. In areas with livestock grazing, fencing ponds effectively protects aquatic vegetation from grazing and prevents livestock from trampling. In this study, we investigated how fencing affects both α-diversity (species richness and diversity within a pond) and β-diversity (species turnover between ponds) by sampling macroinvertebrates and environmental variables from 10 temporary ponds near Palapye, central Botswana. Among these, six ponds were unfenced, and four were fenced. To ensure accurate comparisons, we rarefied species richness and estimated diversity using Hill numbers. We calculated both incidence and abundance-based β-diversity indices. We analysed the relationship between environmental variables and macroinvertebrate communities using redundancy analysis and employed variation partitioning to determine the influence of environmental and distance-related factors on macroinvertebrate variability. Our results showed that fenced ponds exhibited significantly higher Shannon diversity, Simpson diversity and species richness compared to unfenced ponds. Conversely, unfenced ponds experienced greater taxa turnover, while fenced ponds displayed higher abundance-based nestedness. Variation partitioning revealed that environmental factors primarily drove macroinvertebrate variability. These findings support fencing as an effective management strategy to protect macroinvertebrate diversity in temporary ponds within semi-arid, livestock-grazed landscapes. Although fencing enhances α-diversity, it is unnecessary to fence all ponds to maintain β-diversity. The increased nestedness in fenced ponds indicates that macroinvertebrate taxa respond sensitively to habitat disturbances, highlighting the importance of preserving the integrity of fenced ponds to support higher α-diversity.

在半干旱、畜牧区的临时池塘中,围栏是否保护了水生大型无脊椎动物的多样性?
保护池塘中水生大型无脊椎动物的多样性需要保持其栖息地的完整性。在放养牲畜的地区,围栏池塘可以有效地保护水生植被不被放牧,防止牲畜践踏。在这项研究中,我们通过对博茨瓦纳中部Palapye附近的10个临时池塘的大型无脊椎动物和环境变量进行采样,研究围栏如何影响α-多样性(物种丰富度和池塘内的多样性)和β-多样性(池塘间的物种周转)。其中,6个池塘未围篱,4个池塘围篱。为了保证比较的准确性,我们对物种丰富度进行了细化,并利用Hill数估算了物种多样性。我们计算了基于发生率和丰度的β-多样性指数。利用冗余分析方法分析了环境变量与大型无脊椎动物群落之间的关系,并采用变异划分方法确定了环境和距离相关因素对大型无脊椎动物群落变异性的影响。结果表明,围篱池塘的Shannon多样性、Simpson多样性和物种丰富度显著高于未围篱池塘。相反,未设防的池塘有更大的类群更替,而设防的池塘则表现出更高的基于丰度的筑巢性。变异划分表明,环境因素是驱动大型无脊椎动物变异的主要因素。这些发现支持围栏作为一种有效的管理策略,可以保护半干旱、放牧景观中临时池塘中的大型无脊椎动物多样性。虽然围栏可以增强α-多样性,但没有必要为了维持β-多样性而将所有池塘都围栏起来。围栏池塘筑巢性的增加表明大型无脊椎动物类群对生境干扰反应敏感,强调了保护围栏池塘完整性以支持更高α-多样性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Ecology
African Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: African Journal of Ecology (formerly East African Wildlife Journal) publishes original scientific research into the ecology and conservation of the animals and plants of Africa. It has a wide circulation both within and outside Africa and is the foremost research journal on the ecology of the continent. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes comprehensive reviews on topical subjects and brief communications of preliminary results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信