Enhancing mountain grassland mapping: A comparative study with PRISMA hyperspectral, multispectral, and SAR data

IF 4.5 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
E. Patriarca, L. Stendardi, E. Dorigatti, R. Sonnenschein, B. Ventura, M. Claus, M. Castelli, B. Tufail, C. Notarnicola
{"title":"Enhancing mountain grassland mapping: A comparative study with PRISMA hyperspectral, multispectral, and SAR data","authors":"E. Patriarca,&nbsp;L. Stendardi,&nbsp;E. Dorigatti,&nbsp;R. Sonnenschein,&nbsp;B. Ventura,&nbsp;M. Claus,&nbsp;M. Castelli,&nbsp;B. Tufail,&nbsp;C. Notarnicola","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mountain grasslands are increasingly threatened by climate change, land abandonment, and overexploitation. Remote sensing is a valuable tool for monitoring these changes through vegetation mapping. However, challenges such as frequent cloud cover, short growing seasons, and limited field data can reduce the accuracy of results. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of different remote sensing data for classifying mountain grasslands in the Sciliar-Catinaccio Nature Park, Italy. We compared classification results using a hyperspectral PRISMA image (Sept 29, 2023), multispectral data from a single-date Sentinel-2 image (Sept 25, 2023), and Spectral-Temporal Metrics (STM) derived from a Sentinel-2 time series from 2021 to 2023. Additionally, we assessed the impact on accuracy of combining optical datasets with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data, including a time series of 2023 Sentinel-1 backscatter and coherence metrics. Using the Recursive Feature Elimination algorithm (<em>RFE</em>), we selected the most relevant features for classification and applied both Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) classifiers. SVM outperformed RF, performing better with the limited training data available. SAR data did not significantly enhance classification and was therefore excluded by the RFE algorithm. PRISMA-based classification achieved up to 74 % accuracy, while single-date Sentinel-2 imagery reached 52 %. The use of STM improved classification performance, yielding an overall accuracy of 77 %. The highest accuracy (87 %) was achieved by combining PRISMA and STM features. These findings suggest that while individual optical datasets may not provide optimal classification accuracy, integrating data from multiple optical sensors significantly enhances the mapping of mountain grasslands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 101666"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525002198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mountain grasslands are increasingly threatened by climate change, land abandonment, and overexploitation. Remote sensing is a valuable tool for monitoring these changes through vegetation mapping. However, challenges such as frequent cloud cover, short growing seasons, and limited field data can reduce the accuracy of results. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of different remote sensing data for classifying mountain grasslands in the Sciliar-Catinaccio Nature Park, Italy. We compared classification results using a hyperspectral PRISMA image (Sept 29, 2023), multispectral data from a single-date Sentinel-2 image (Sept 25, 2023), and Spectral-Temporal Metrics (STM) derived from a Sentinel-2 time series from 2021 to 2023. Additionally, we assessed the impact on accuracy of combining optical datasets with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data, including a time series of 2023 Sentinel-1 backscatter and coherence metrics. Using the Recursive Feature Elimination algorithm (RFE), we selected the most relevant features for classification and applied both Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) classifiers. SVM outperformed RF, performing better with the limited training data available. SAR data did not significantly enhance classification and was therefore excluded by the RFE algorithm. PRISMA-based classification achieved up to 74 % accuracy, while single-date Sentinel-2 imagery reached 52 %. The use of STM improved classification performance, yielding an overall accuracy of 77 %. The highest accuracy (87 %) was achieved by combining PRISMA and STM features. These findings suggest that while individual optical datasets may not provide optimal classification accuracy, integrating data from multiple optical sensors significantly enhances the mapping of mountain grasslands.
加强山地草地制图:PRISMA高光谱、多光谱和SAR数据对比研究
气候变化、土地荒废和过度开发对山地草原的威胁日益严重。遥感是通过植被测绘监测这些变化的宝贵工具。然而,诸如频繁的云层覆盖、较短的生长季节和有限的现场数据等挑战会降低结果的准确性。本研究以意大利Sciliar-Catinaccio自然公园为研究对象,对不同遥感数据在山地草地分类中的有效性进行了评价。我们比较了高光谱PRISMA图像(2023年9月29日)、单日期Sentinel-2图像(2023年9月25日)的多光谱数据和Sentinel-2时间序列(2021年至2023年)的光谱-时间度量(STM)的分类结果。此外,我们还评估了光学数据集与合成孔径雷达(SAR)数据相结合对精度的影响,包括2023年Sentinel-1背向散射和相干指标的时间序列。使用递归特征消除算法(RFE),选择最相关的特征进行分类,并同时应用随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)分类器。SVM优于RF,在有限的可用训练数据下表现更好。SAR数据没有显著增强分类,因此被RFE算法排除在外。基于prisma的分类准确率高达74%,而单日期Sentinel-2图像的准确率为52%。STM的使用提高了分类性能,总体准确率达到77%。结合PRISMA和STM特征,准确率最高(87%)。这些发现表明,虽然单独的光学数据集可能无法提供最佳的分类精度,但整合多个光学传感器的数据可以显著提高山地草原的制图精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
204
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信