Advancing Hemostatic Powder Technologies for Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Challenges and Solutions

IF 0.9 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kiandokht Bashiri , Alireza Meighani , Mark C. Mattar , Reezwana Chowdhury , Sadegh Poozesh
{"title":"Advancing Hemostatic Powder Technologies for Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Challenges and Solutions","authors":"Kiandokht Bashiri ,&nbsp;Alireza Meighani ,&nbsp;Mark C. Mattar ,&nbsp;Reezwana Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Sadegh Poozesh","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2025.250940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hemostatic powder spray (HPS) such as Hemospray or EndoClot is used for endoscopic treatment of both upper and lower Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, demonstrating high immediate hemostasis rates across various types, including nonvariceal, variceal, and tumor-related hemorrhages. Compared to conventional therapies, HPS exhibits significantly higher odds of primary hemostasis and is particularly effective in challenging cases such as diffuse hemorrhage, refractory gastric variceal bleeding, and malignant bleeding where there is no single focal area suitable for cauterization or clipping. Despite its clinical effectiveness, several challenges impede its broader application, including moisture-induced powder clumping, limited adhesion in the humid GI environment, transient hemostatic effects, and frequent catheter clogging. Additionally, existing CO₂-propelled delivery systems with fixed mixing ratios restrict adaptability across diverse clinical scenarios. This review systematically examines these limitations and proposes comprehensive solutions to enhance HPS's performance. Key advancements discussed include optimized powder formulations, suspension-based delivery systems, and the utilization of alternative propellant gases to mitigate clumping and improve adhesion. Furthermore, innovative delivery mechanisms such as hybrid mixing systems, adjustable catheter tips, and the integration of real-time feedback mechanisms are explored to increase precision and efficacy. By addressing these technical and operational challenges, this review outlines a strategic pathway for optimizing HPS’s functionality and expanding its clinical utility in managing GI bleeding, aiming to improve patient outcomes and procedural reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"27 4","pages":"Article 250940"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030725000352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemostatic powder spray (HPS) such as Hemospray or EndoClot is used for endoscopic treatment of both upper and lower Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, demonstrating high immediate hemostasis rates across various types, including nonvariceal, variceal, and tumor-related hemorrhages. Compared to conventional therapies, HPS exhibits significantly higher odds of primary hemostasis and is particularly effective in challenging cases such as diffuse hemorrhage, refractory gastric variceal bleeding, and malignant bleeding where there is no single focal area suitable for cauterization or clipping. Despite its clinical effectiveness, several challenges impede its broader application, including moisture-induced powder clumping, limited adhesion in the humid GI environment, transient hemostatic effects, and frequent catheter clogging. Additionally, existing CO₂-propelled delivery systems with fixed mixing ratios restrict adaptability across diverse clinical scenarios. This review systematically examines these limitations and proposes comprehensive solutions to enhance HPS's performance. Key advancements discussed include optimized powder formulations, suspension-based delivery systems, and the utilization of alternative propellant gases to mitigate clumping and improve adhesion. Furthermore, innovative delivery mechanisms such as hybrid mixing systems, adjustable catheter tips, and the integration of real-time feedback mechanisms are explored to increase precision and efficacy. By addressing these technical and operational challenges, this review outlines a strategic pathway for optimizing HPS’s functionality and expanding its clinical utility in managing GI bleeding, aiming to improve patient outcomes and procedural reliability.
推进止血粉技术用于胃肠道出血的管理:挑战和解决方案
止血粉末喷雾(HPS),如止血喷雾或EndoClot,用于内镜治疗上消化道和下消化道出血,在各种类型(包括非静脉曲张、静脉曲张和肿瘤相关出血)中显示出高的即时止血率。与传统治疗方法相比,HPS具有更高的原发性止血几率,并且在弥漫性出血、难治性胃静脉曲张出血和恶性出血等难治性病例中特别有效,这些病例没有适合烧灼或夹住的单一病灶区域。尽管其临床效果良好,但一些挑战阻碍了其更广泛的应用,包括潮湿诱导的粉末结块,潮湿胃肠道环境中的有限粘连,短暂止血效果以及频繁的导管堵塞。此外,现有的固定混合比例的二氧化碳推进输送系统限制了不同临床场景的适应性。这篇综述系统地检查了这些限制,并提出了全面的解决方案,以提高HPS的性能。讨论的关键进展包括优化的粉末配方,基于悬浮的输送系统,以及替代推进剂气体的利用,以减轻结块和提高附着力。此外,研究人员还探索了混合混合系统、可调节导管尖端和实时反馈机制的集成等创新输送机制,以提高精度和效率。通过解决这些技术和操作上的挑战,本综述概述了优化HPS功能和扩大其在胃肠道出血管理中的临床应用的战略途径,旨在改善患者预后和手术可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信