The Conceptual Profile of Molecule as a Manifestation of Representational Pluralism in Chemistry

IF 3.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Renata Reis Pereira, Eduardo Fleury Mortimer
{"title":"The Conceptual Profile of Molecule as a Manifestation of Representational Pluralism in Chemistry","authors":"Renata Reis Pereira,&nbsp;Eduardo Fleury Mortimer","doi":"10.1007/s11191-025-00641-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We assume the existence of conceptual profiles as a manifestation of pluralism in science education. This means recognizing the heterogeneity of thinking and speaking, that is, the coexistence of two or more meanings of the same word or concept that are accessed and used by the individual in appropriate contexts. Science is not a homogeneous way of knowing and provides multiple ways of seeing the world, which can exist together within the same individual and be used in different contexts. Scholars of conceptual profiles are interested in investigating how science teaching could be designed to effectively address heterogeneity of thinking as teachers attempt to create conditions for students to understand and learn scientific concepts. In this work, we present a conceptual profile of the molecule consisting of six zones (first principles, substantialism, geometrically arranged atoms, compositionist, interactionist, and modern molecule), revealing the relationship between this conceptual profile and the pluralism of molecular representations. We also present the ontological and epistemological commitments that shape these zones as well as the ways of speaking that were identified in the empirical data and the relationships with the pluralism of molecule representations. We then explore an activity designed to make explicit the use of zones in this profile and applied at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels, seeking to identify how students at different levels of education access the different zones.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"34 4","pages":"2079 - 2105"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-025-00641-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assume the existence of conceptual profiles as a manifestation of pluralism in science education. This means recognizing the heterogeneity of thinking and speaking, that is, the coexistence of two or more meanings of the same word or concept that are accessed and used by the individual in appropriate contexts. Science is not a homogeneous way of knowing and provides multiple ways of seeing the world, which can exist together within the same individual and be used in different contexts. Scholars of conceptual profiles are interested in investigating how science teaching could be designed to effectively address heterogeneity of thinking as teachers attempt to create conditions for students to understand and learn scientific concepts. In this work, we present a conceptual profile of the molecule consisting of six zones (first principles, substantialism, geometrically arranged atoms, compositionist, interactionist, and modern molecule), revealing the relationship between this conceptual profile and the pluralism of molecular representations. We also present the ontological and epistemological commitments that shape these zones as well as the ways of speaking that were identified in the empirical data and the relationships with the pluralism of molecule representations. We then explore an activity designed to make explicit the use of zones in this profile and applied at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels, seeking to identify how students at different levels of education access the different zones.

分子的概念轮廓:化学表征多元化的一种表现
我们认为概念概况的存在是科学教育多元化的一种表现。这意味着认识到思考和说话的异质性,也就是说,在适当的上下文中,个人可以访问和使用同一个单词或概念的两个或多个含义的共存。科学不是一种同质的认识方式,它提供了多种看待世界的方式,这些方式可以在同一个人身上共存,也可以在不同的背景下使用。研究概念概况的学者感兴趣的是,在教师试图为学生理解和学习科学概念创造条件时,如何设计科学教学来有效地解决思维的异质性。在这项工作中,我们提出了由六个区域(第一性原理、实体性、几何排列的原子、组合主义、相互作用主义和现代分子)组成的分子概念轮廓,揭示了这一概念轮廓与分子表征的多元性之间的关系。我们还提出了塑造这些区域的本体论和认识论承诺,以及在经验数据中确定的说话方式,以及与分子表征的多元性的关系。然后,我们探索了一项活动,旨在明确该剖面中区域的使用,并应用于本科和研究生水平,试图确定不同教育水平的学生如何访问不同的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信