Examining Mathematics Teachers Noticing the Rationality: Scenario-Based Training with AI Chatbot

IF 3.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Selen Galiç, Selin Urhan, Şenol Dost, Zsolt Lavicza
{"title":"Examining Mathematics Teachers Noticing the Rationality: Scenario-Based Training with AI Chatbot","authors":"Selen Galiç,&nbsp;Selin Urhan,&nbsp;Şenol Dost,&nbsp;Zsolt Lavicza","doi":"10.1007/s11191-025-00618-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is essential that students are encouraged to become rational thinkers for building thinking classrooms. Teachers must adopt rational questioning techniques to facilitate the development of rational behaviours in their students. However, the implementation of rational questioning requires the ability to respond to students based on their performance, thereby requiring teacher noticing in the context of rationality. In this study, we adopt teacher noticing in the context of three components of rationality (epistemic, teleological, and communicative) and demonstrate the potential of ChatGPT to monitor teachers’ noticing the rationality. In this context, we conducted scenario-based training with three in-service mathematics teachers using ChatGPT. Participants were presented with a scenario involving a common difficulty related to the concept of slope and were asked to engage in an interactive session with ChatGPT. We then conducted individual interviews to gain insight into their noticing the rationality. Our findings clearly pointed to a tendency among the teachers to focus on the epistemic and teleological aspects of ChatGPT’s response, with no engagement in communicative decision-making. ChatGPT provided the opportunity to determine the cases in which the teacher could not attend and interpret the rationality and decide for rational questioning. Based on these findings, we suggest that ChatGPT could be used as a tool for monitoring teacher noticing the rationality in teacher education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"34 4","pages":"2759 - 2790"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-025-00618-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-025-00618-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is essential that students are encouraged to become rational thinkers for building thinking classrooms. Teachers must adopt rational questioning techniques to facilitate the development of rational behaviours in their students. However, the implementation of rational questioning requires the ability to respond to students based on their performance, thereby requiring teacher noticing in the context of rationality. In this study, we adopt teacher noticing in the context of three components of rationality (epistemic, teleological, and communicative) and demonstrate the potential of ChatGPT to monitor teachers’ noticing the rationality. In this context, we conducted scenario-based training with three in-service mathematics teachers using ChatGPT. Participants were presented with a scenario involving a common difficulty related to the concept of slope and were asked to engage in an interactive session with ChatGPT. We then conducted individual interviews to gain insight into their noticing the rationality. Our findings clearly pointed to a tendency among the teachers to focus on the epistemic and teleological aspects of ChatGPT’s response, with no engagement in communicative decision-making. ChatGPT provided the opportunity to determine the cases in which the teacher could not attend and interpret the rationality and decide for rational questioning. Based on these findings, we suggest that ChatGPT could be used as a tool for monitoring teacher noticing the rationality in teacher education.

考察数学教师关注合理性:基于AI聊天机器人的场景训练
为了建设思维课堂,鼓励学生成为理性的思考者是至关重要的。教师必须采用理性提问的技巧来促进学生理性行为的发展。然而,理性提问的实施要求教师有能力根据学生的表现做出回应,这就要求教师在理性的语境下进行关注。在本研究中,我们在理性的三个组成部分(认识论、目的论和交际)的背景下采用教师注意,并展示了ChatGPT监测教师注意理性的潜力。在此背景下,我们使用ChatGPT对三位在职数学教师进行了基于场景的培训。参与者被展示了一个涉及与斜率概念相关的常见困难的场景,并被要求与ChatGPT进行互动。然后,我们进行了个别访谈,以深入了解他们注意到的合理性。我们的研究结果清楚地指出,教师倾向于关注ChatGPT反应的认识论和目的论方面,而不参与交际决策。ChatGPT提供了确定教师无法参加的案例的机会,并解释合理性并决定进行理性质疑。基于这些发现,我们建议ChatGPT可以作为监控教师注意教师教育合理性的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信