Exploring the Impact of a Task-specific Warning to Overcome Intuitive Interference: Humble Lesson on How to Teach in the Context of Representational Plurality

IF 3.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Reuven Babai, Geneviève Allaire-Duquette
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of a Task-specific Warning to Overcome Intuitive Interference: Humble Lesson on How to Teach in the Context of Representational Plurality","authors":"Reuven Babai,&nbsp;Geneviève Allaire-Duquette","doi":"10.1007/s11191-024-00610-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Irrelevant but salient (automatically processed) variables of a given science or mathematics task are known to cause intuitive interference with formal reasoning, leading to incorrect responses. To help students overcome intuitive interference, one approach focuses on a warning intervention which aims at activating executive control mechanisms, hence increasing the ability to overcome the tendency to respond in line with the irrelevant salient variable. In this paper, we examine the impact of a task specific warning in the comparison of perimeters task on success rate and response time in three samples: primary school pupils, university students from science and mathematics education programs and university students and recent alumni in fields other than science and mathematics education. Results suggest that a task-specific warning helps primary school pupils and university students in science and mathematics education programs overcome the intuitive interference. However, the warning did not impact the success rate of university students and recent alumni in fields other than science and mathematics education. Overall, given the potential incompatibility of the plurality of representations in science and mathematics tasks, our data suggests that an explicit warning can help learners to opt for the appropriate representation. However, a key factor in a successful warning intervention seems to be promoting a greater willingness to examine ones’ ideas or an openness to representational change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"34 4","pages":"2031 - 2049"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-024-00610-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrelevant but salient (automatically processed) variables of a given science or mathematics task are known to cause intuitive interference with formal reasoning, leading to incorrect responses. To help students overcome intuitive interference, one approach focuses on a warning intervention which aims at activating executive control mechanisms, hence increasing the ability to overcome the tendency to respond in line with the irrelevant salient variable. In this paper, we examine the impact of a task specific warning in the comparison of perimeters task on success rate and response time in three samples: primary school pupils, university students from science and mathematics education programs and university students and recent alumni in fields other than science and mathematics education. Results suggest that a task-specific warning helps primary school pupils and university students in science and mathematics education programs overcome the intuitive interference. However, the warning did not impact the success rate of university students and recent alumni in fields other than science and mathematics education. Overall, given the potential incompatibility of the plurality of representations in science and mathematics tasks, our data suggests that an explicit warning can help learners to opt for the appropriate representation. However, a key factor in a successful warning intervention seems to be promoting a greater willingness to examine ones’ ideas or an openness to representational change.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

探索特定任务警告对克服直觉干扰的影响:如何在代表性多元化的背景下进行教学的浅见
已知给定科学或数学任务中不相关但显著(自动处理)的变量会导致对形式推理的直觉干扰,从而导致错误的反应。为了帮助学生克服直觉干扰,一种方法侧重于警告干预,旨在激活执行控制机制,从而提高克服与无关显著变量一致的反应倾向的能力。在本文中,我们研究了任务特定警告在周界任务比较中对成功率和反应时间的影响,在三个样本中:小学生、科学和数学教育专业的大学生和非科学和数学教育领域的大学生和最近的校友。结果表明,任务特定警告有助于中小学生和大学生在科学和数学教育项目中克服直觉干扰。然而,这一警告并没有影响到大学生和最近的校友在科学和数学教育以外的领域的成功率。总的来说,考虑到科学和数学任务中多种表征的潜在不兼容性,我们的数据表明,明确的警告可以帮助学习者选择适当的表征。然而,成功的警告干预的一个关键因素似乎是促使人们更愿意检查自己的想法或对代表性变化持开放态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信