{"title":"Biomedical knowledge graph verification with multitask learning architectures","authors":"Chih-Ping Wei , Pei-Yuan Tsai , Jih-Jane Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Large-scale biomedical KGs, typically constructed using automated entity-relation extraction methods from vast amounts of textual documents, often contain erroneous biomedical triplets, which raises concerns about their quality. Using such noisy KGs in downstream applications can compromise the validity of biomedical research and lead to inaccurate conclusions. This study aims to design an effective knowledge graph verification (KGV) method to determine the correctness of triplets in biomedical KGs, enabling the removal of erroneous triplets identified through the proposed method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We propose a multitask-learning-based KGV (referred to as the MTL-KGV) method, which includes two key stages: 1) KG embedding (KGE) learning and (2) triplet classification model learning. In addition, we explore three types of multitask learning (MTL) architectures—hard parameter sharing (HPS), multi-gate mixture-of-experts (MMoE), and customized gate control (CGC)—for triplet classification model learning.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Using SemMedDB as a data source to construct a large-scale KG for KGE training and a dataset of 6,427 biomedical triplets annotated by a domain expert, we empirically evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed MTL-KGV method by comparing it to several benchmark methods. Our evaluation results indicate that all three versions of our proposed MTL-KGV method consistently outperform the benchmark methods. Moreover, our proposed method with the MMoE multitask learning architecture emerges as the most effective for detecting erroneous biomedical triplets.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This work contributes to KGV research by introducing a multitask learning framework tailored for KGV. The proposed MTL-KGV method improves the quality of biomedical KGs, thereby supporting downstream applications and advancing biomedical research that relies on these biomedical KGs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 104894"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425001236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Large-scale biomedical KGs, typically constructed using automated entity-relation extraction methods from vast amounts of textual documents, often contain erroneous biomedical triplets, which raises concerns about their quality. Using such noisy KGs in downstream applications can compromise the validity of biomedical research and lead to inaccurate conclusions. This study aims to design an effective knowledge graph verification (KGV) method to determine the correctness of triplets in biomedical KGs, enabling the removal of erroneous triplets identified through the proposed method.
Methods
We propose a multitask-learning-based KGV (referred to as the MTL-KGV) method, which includes two key stages: 1) KG embedding (KGE) learning and (2) triplet classification model learning. In addition, we explore three types of multitask learning (MTL) architectures—hard parameter sharing (HPS), multi-gate mixture-of-experts (MMoE), and customized gate control (CGC)—for triplet classification model learning.
Results
Using SemMedDB as a data source to construct a large-scale KG for KGE training and a dataset of 6,427 biomedical triplets annotated by a domain expert, we empirically evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed MTL-KGV method by comparing it to several benchmark methods. Our evaluation results indicate that all three versions of our proposed MTL-KGV method consistently outperform the benchmark methods. Moreover, our proposed method with the MMoE multitask learning architecture emerges as the most effective for detecting erroneous biomedical triplets.
Conclusion
This work contributes to KGV research by introducing a multitask learning framework tailored for KGV. The proposed MTL-KGV method improves the quality of biomedical KGs, thereby supporting downstream applications and advancing biomedical research that relies on these biomedical KGs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.