Development of a Sensory Lexicon for Gluten Free Crackers Commercially Available in the United States

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Japneet Brar, Rajesh Kumar, Martin J. Talavera
{"title":"Development of a Sensory Lexicon for Gluten Free Crackers Commercially Available in the United States","authors":"Japneet Brar,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar,&nbsp;Martin J. Talavera","doi":"10.1111/joss.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>With the rapidly expanding gluten-free crackers (GFC) market, it is important to understand their sensory properties for product development, marketing, and consumer acceptance. Until now, no research has developed a broadly applicable sensory lexicon of commercial plain/original GFC. This work used 10 plain GFC for descriptive analysis, based on seven different main flours (tapioca, cassava, white rice, brown rice, nut flour blend, millet flour blend, and jasmine rice). The crackers were evaluated by five highly trained panelists using a consensus method and a 150-point scale with 1.0 increments for intensity quantification. Three qualitative and 44 quantitative characteristics (10 appearance, 27 flavor, and seven texture attributes) were developed along with definitions and references. Visual (thickness, roughness, and shininess), texture (thickness, hardness, fracturability, grittiness, dryness/moisture absorbency, tooth packing, and astringency), and flavors (salt, sweet, starch complex, toasted, cardboard, and gluten character) were present in practically all samples. Other attributes such as dairy, coconut, seaweed, soy sauce, and black pepper were present only in certain crackers. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that crackers with the same flour type were not necessarily positioned close, showing the distinct sensory profiles even when formulated with the same flour base. The PCA for appearance and texture attributes explained 56.65% variability, mainly originating from the amount of seeds, size of seeds, roughness, and hardness. Similarly, the aroma and flavor PCA explained 49.1% variability, characterized by earthy, cardboard, burnt, nutty, oily, and salty. The lexicon offers a standardized blueprint of sensory properties for the plain GFC industry that can be used to profile similar products in the market.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapidly expanding gluten-free crackers (GFC) market, it is important to understand their sensory properties for product development, marketing, and consumer acceptance. Until now, no research has developed a broadly applicable sensory lexicon of commercial plain/original GFC. This work used 10 plain GFC for descriptive analysis, based on seven different main flours (tapioca, cassava, white rice, brown rice, nut flour blend, millet flour blend, and jasmine rice). The crackers were evaluated by five highly trained panelists using a consensus method and a 150-point scale with 1.0 increments for intensity quantification. Three qualitative and 44 quantitative characteristics (10 appearance, 27 flavor, and seven texture attributes) were developed along with definitions and references. Visual (thickness, roughness, and shininess), texture (thickness, hardness, fracturability, grittiness, dryness/moisture absorbency, tooth packing, and astringency), and flavors (salt, sweet, starch complex, toasted, cardboard, and gluten character) were present in practically all samples. Other attributes such as dairy, coconut, seaweed, soy sauce, and black pepper were present only in certain crackers. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that crackers with the same flour type were not necessarily positioned close, showing the distinct sensory profiles even when formulated with the same flour base. The PCA for appearance and texture attributes explained 56.65% variability, mainly originating from the amount of seeds, size of seeds, roughness, and hardness. Similarly, the aroma and flavor PCA explained 49.1% variability, characterized by earthy, cardboard, burnt, nutty, oily, and salty. The lexicon offers a standardized blueprint of sensory properties for the plain GFC industry that can be used to profile similar products in the market.

在美国市售的无麸质饼干感官词典的开发
随着无谷蛋白饼干(GFC)市场的迅速扩大,了解其感官特性对产品开发,营销和消费者接受度非常重要。到目前为止,还没有研究开发出一个广泛适用的商业平原/原始GFC感官词汇。这项工作使用10个普通GFC进行描述性分析,基于七种不同的主要面粉(木薯粉、木薯粉、白米、糙米、坚果粉混合粉、小米粉混合粉和茉莉花米)。饼干由五位训练有素的小组成员使用共识方法和150分量表进行评估,1.0增量用于强度量化。3个定性特征和44个定量特征(10个外观属性,27个风味属性和7个质地属性)以及定义和参考。外观(厚度,粗糙度和光泽),质地(厚度,硬度,可破碎性,砂砾性,干燥/吸湿性,牙齿包装和涩味)和风味(盐,甜,淀粉复合,烤,纸板和面筋特征)几乎存在于所有样品中。其他成分如乳制品、椰子、海藻、酱油和黑胡椒只存在于某些饼干中。主成分分析(PCA)表明,相同面粉类型的饼干并不一定定位接近,即使在相同的面粉基础上配制,也表现出不同的感官特征。外观和质地属性的主成分分析解释了56.65%的变异,主要来源于种子数量、种子大小、粗糙度和硬度。同样,香气和风味PCA解释了49.1%的差异,其特征是泥土味、纸板味、烧焦味、坚果味、油性和咸味。该词典为普通GFC行业提供了感官特性的标准化蓝图,可用于描述市场上的类似产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信