Optimized post-processing parameters for dry bone computed tomography imaging: Recommendations for diverse research applications

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Haiyang Xing , Jiajing Zhu , Ruiqi Zou , Xiongfeng Tang , Min Yi , Zhuoting Xie , Quanchao Zhang , Yanguo Qin
{"title":"Optimized post-processing parameters for dry bone computed tomography imaging: Recommendations for diverse research applications","authors":"Haiyang Xing ,&nbsp;Jiajing Zhu ,&nbsp;Ruiqi Zou ,&nbsp;Xiongfeng Tang ,&nbsp;Min Yi ,&nbsp;Zhuoting Xie ,&nbsp;Quanchao Zhang ,&nbsp;Yanguo Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the performance of different convolution kernels and reconstruction matrices in enhancing computed tomography (CT) image quality and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction quality. Based on these findings, recommendations for optimizing CT post-processing parameters are provided to meet various research needs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-nine dry human femurs, excavated from archaeological sites, were selected for analysis. Two blinded reviewers scored the CT images from four convolution kernel and reconstruction matrix combinations using a five-point Likert scale for image quality. For 3D reconstruction quality, models generated by optical scanners served as the gold standard and were compared with four CT groups. Measurements included length, angle, cross-sectional area, and volume.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CT images processed with the Br59 + 512 group achieved the highest image quality scores. For 3D reconstruction quality, a significant difference in length measurements was observed between the Br40 + 512 and Br40 + 1024 groups (P &lt; 0.05). Angle measurements showed no significant differences across all groups. In cross-sectional area and volume measurements, the Br40 + 1024 group showed no statistically significant difference from the reference group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Sharp convolution kernels are associated with higher image quality, whereas soft kernels help reduce noise and enhance 3D reconstruction quality. Although larger reconstruction matrices do not significantly improve image quality based on visual assessment, they contribute to higher-quality 3D models. We recommend the Br59 kernel with a 512 matrix for optimal image observation and the Br40 kernel with a 1024 matrix for 3D reconstruction and morphological analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25004620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare the performance of different convolution kernels and reconstruction matrices in enhancing computed tomography (CT) image quality and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction quality. Based on these findings, recommendations for optimizing CT post-processing parameters are provided to meet various research needs.

Methods

Forty-nine dry human femurs, excavated from archaeological sites, were selected for analysis. Two blinded reviewers scored the CT images from four convolution kernel and reconstruction matrix combinations using a five-point Likert scale for image quality. For 3D reconstruction quality, models generated by optical scanners served as the gold standard and were compared with four CT groups. Measurements included length, angle, cross-sectional area, and volume.

Results

CT images processed with the Br59 + 512 group achieved the highest image quality scores. For 3D reconstruction quality, a significant difference in length measurements was observed between the Br40 + 512 and Br40 + 1024 groups (P < 0.05). Angle measurements showed no significant differences across all groups. In cross-sectional area and volume measurements, the Br40 + 1024 group showed no statistically significant difference from the reference group.

Conclusion

Sharp convolution kernels are associated with higher image quality, whereas soft kernels help reduce noise and enhance 3D reconstruction quality. Although larger reconstruction matrices do not significantly improve image quality based on visual assessment, they contribute to higher-quality 3D models. We recommend the Br59 kernel with a 512 matrix for optimal image observation and the Br40 kernel with a 1024 matrix for 3D reconstruction and morphological analyses.
干骨计算机断层成像的优化后处理参数:各种研究应用的建议
目的比较不同卷积核和重建矩阵在增强CT图像质量和三维重建质量方面的性能。在此基础上,提出了优化CT后处理参数的建议,以满足各种研究需求。方法选取考古遗址出土的49根干人骨进行分析。两名盲评者使用5点李克特图像质量量表对CT图像从四个卷积核和重建矩阵组合进行评分。对于三维重建质量,光学扫描仪生成的模型作为金标准,并与四个CT组进行比较。测量包括长度、角度、横截面积和体积。结果Br59 + 512组处理的sct图像质量得分最高。对于3D重建质量,Br40 + 512组和Br40 + 1024组之间的长度测量存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。角度测量在各组间无显著差异。在横截面积和体积测量上,Br40 + 1024组与对照组无统计学差异。结论锐卷积核能提高图像质量,而软卷积核能降低噪声,提高三维重建质量。虽然更大的重建矩阵并不能显著提高基于视觉评估的图像质量,但它们有助于提高3D模型的质量。我们推荐具有512矩阵的Br59内核用于最佳图像观察,而具有1024矩阵的Br40内核用于3D重建和形态学分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信