Influence of surface curvature and pinch span on the maximal force exertion of pinch grip: a prospective cohort study

IF 3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Jeewon Choi , Yu Lin , Ping Yeap Loh
{"title":"Influence of surface curvature and pinch span on the maximal force exertion of pinch grip: a prospective cohort study","authors":"Jeewon Choi ,&nbsp;Yu Lin ,&nbsp;Ping Yeap Loh","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated how the pinch surface curvature and pinch span influence the maximal voluntary pinch grip forces (MVFs) for different pinch types. Twelve male participants (age range: 22–34) underwent MVF measurements using a pinch grip on a dynamometer with six interchangeable attachment surfaces. They were randomly assigned to either a concave or convex handle group, each tested with three pinch spans (3, 5, and 7 cm) using a custom-designed dynamometer (Model T.K.K. 1269m and TSA-210; Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd.). The pinch type was controlled as a tip, three-jaw, or key pinch, and both the dominant and non-dominant hands were examined. After completing the trials for each condition, participants rated their overall comfort, perceived fit, and perceived difficulty on a 5-point rating scale. We demonstrated that the concave surface was associated with greater MVFs than the convex surface (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). However, the difference in MVF was insignificant when the pinch span was increased to 7 cm. The key pinch and dominant hand showed higher MVFs, better fit, and lower difficulty than their counterparts (key pinch: <em>p</em>s &lt; 0.05; dominant hand: <em>p</em>s &lt; 0.01). This study provides evidence on the design of pinch surface curvature and span that can effectively enhance MVF performance under varying pinch span conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 103800"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125001064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated how the pinch surface curvature and pinch span influence the maximal voluntary pinch grip forces (MVFs) for different pinch types. Twelve male participants (age range: 22–34) underwent MVF measurements using a pinch grip on a dynamometer with six interchangeable attachment surfaces. They were randomly assigned to either a concave or convex handle group, each tested with three pinch spans (3, 5, and 7 cm) using a custom-designed dynamometer (Model T.K.K. 1269m and TSA-210; Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd.). The pinch type was controlled as a tip, three-jaw, or key pinch, and both the dominant and non-dominant hands were examined. After completing the trials for each condition, participants rated their overall comfort, perceived fit, and perceived difficulty on a 5-point rating scale. We demonstrated that the concave surface was associated with greater MVFs than the convex surface (p < 0.01). However, the difference in MVF was insignificant when the pinch span was increased to 7 cm. The key pinch and dominant hand showed higher MVFs, better fit, and lower difficulty than their counterparts (key pinch: ps < 0.05; dominant hand: ps < 0.01). This study provides evidence on the design of pinch surface curvature and span that can effectively enhance MVF performance under varying pinch span conditions.
面曲率和捏握间距对捏握最大力发挥影响的前瞻性队列研究
本文研究了不同夹握类型下,夹握面曲率和夹握跨度对最大自主夹握力的影响。12名男性参与者(年龄范围:22-34岁)接受了MVF测量,使用一个夹握在6个可互换的附着表面的测力计上。他们被随机分配到凹柄组或凸柄组,每个组使用定制设计的测力计(型号T.K.K. 1269m和TSA-210;武井科学仪器有限公司)进行三个捏距(3,5和7厘米)的测试。捏捏类型被控制为尖捏、三颚捏或键捏,并且检查了优势手和非优势手。在完成每种条件的试验后,参与者对他们的整体舒适度、感知契合度和感知困难度进行了5分制的评分。我们证明了凹表面比凸表面与更大的MVFs相关(p < 0.01)。当夹紧间距增加到7 cm时,MVF的差异不显著。键捏和优势手的MVFs值较高,配合度较好,难度较低(键捏:ps <; 0.05;优势手:ps <; 0.01)。研究结果表明,在不同夹紧跨度条件下,夹紧曲面曲率和夹紧跨度的设计可以有效地提高MVF的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信