{"title":"Influence of surface curvature and pinch span on the maximal force exertion of pinch grip: a prospective cohort study","authors":"Jeewon Choi , Yu Lin , Ping Yeap Loh","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated how the pinch surface curvature and pinch span influence the maximal voluntary pinch grip forces (MVFs) for different pinch types. Twelve male participants (age range: 22–34) underwent MVF measurements using a pinch grip on a dynamometer with six interchangeable attachment surfaces. They were randomly assigned to either a concave or convex handle group, each tested with three pinch spans (3, 5, and 7 cm) using a custom-designed dynamometer (Model T.K.K. 1269m and TSA-210; Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd.). The pinch type was controlled as a tip, three-jaw, or key pinch, and both the dominant and non-dominant hands were examined. After completing the trials for each condition, participants rated their overall comfort, perceived fit, and perceived difficulty on a 5-point rating scale. We demonstrated that the concave surface was associated with greater MVFs than the convex surface (<em>p</em> < 0.01). However, the difference in MVF was insignificant when the pinch span was increased to 7 cm. The key pinch and dominant hand showed higher MVFs, better fit, and lower difficulty than their counterparts (key pinch: <em>p</em>s < 0.05; dominant hand: <em>p</em>s < 0.01). This study provides evidence on the design of pinch surface curvature and span that can effectively enhance MVF performance under varying pinch span conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 103800"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125001064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated how the pinch surface curvature and pinch span influence the maximal voluntary pinch grip forces (MVFs) for different pinch types. Twelve male participants (age range: 22–34) underwent MVF measurements using a pinch grip on a dynamometer with six interchangeable attachment surfaces. They were randomly assigned to either a concave or convex handle group, each tested with three pinch spans (3, 5, and 7 cm) using a custom-designed dynamometer (Model T.K.K. 1269m and TSA-210; Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd.). The pinch type was controlled as a tip, three-jaw, or key pinch, and both the dominant and non-dominant hands were examined. After completing the trials for each condition, participants rated their overall comfort, perceived fit, and perceived difficulty on a 5-point rating scale. We demonstrated that the concave surface was associated with greater MVFs than the convex surface (p < 0.01). However, the difference in MVF was insignificant when the pinch span was increased to 7 cm. The key pinch and dominant hand showed higher MVFs, better fit, and lower difficulty than their counterparts (key pinch: ps < 0.05; dominant hand: ps < 0.01). This study provides evidence on the design of pinch surface curvature and span that can effectively enhance MVF performance under varying pinch span conditions.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.