Timescales of dopamine release in the striatum as a window into hierarchical control

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Amy C Gottschalk, Nicholas G Faturos, Arif A Hamid
{"title":"Timescales of dopamine release in the striatum as a window into hierarchical control","authors":"Amy C Gottschalk,&nbsp;Nicholas G Faturos,&nbsp;Arif A Hamid","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reinforcement learning community has made significant progress in understanding dopamine (DA) in reward learning, cognitive control, and motivation. Yet, little consensus remains about the functions of distinct DA bandwidths: fast phasic transients (milliseconds), ramps (seconds), and slow tonic shifts (minutes). Are these dynamics independent channels conveying distinct decision variables or temporal expressions of a unified DA computation? These questions lie at the heart of competing frameworks proposing divergent mechanisms for DA in reinforcement learning. This rift reflects not only conceptual disagreements but also the historical limitations of bandwidth-limited measurement tools. Emerging breakthroughs for wideband DA quantification promise rigorous testing of these theories. Here, we synthesize recent conceptual and technical advances and extend our prior proposals, suggesting that DA timescales reflect hierarchical control signals, emerging from perception of goal progress and distributed, circuit-level inference about policy efficacy where tonic DA represents the integration of goal alignment abstracted across planning horizons and control hierarchy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625001081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reinforcement learning community has made significant progress in understanding dopamine (DA) in reward learning, cognitive control, and motivation. Yet, little consensus remains about the functions of distinct DA bandwidths: fast phasic transients (milliseconds), ramps (seconds), and slow tonic shifts (minutes). Are these dynamics independent channels conveying distinct decision variables or temporal expressions of a unified DA computation? These questions lie at the heart of competing frameworks proposing divergent mechanisms for DA in reinforcement learning. This rift reflects not only conceptual disagreements but also the historical limitations of bandwidth-limited measurement tools. Emerging breakthroughs for wideband DA quantification promise rigorous testing of these theories. Here, we synthesize recent conceptual and technical advances and extend our prior proposals, suggesting that DA timescales reflect hierarchical control signals, emerging from perception of goal progress and distributed, circuit-level inference about policy efficacy where tonic DA represents the integration of goal alignment abstracted across planning horizons and control hierarchy.
纹状体中多巴胺释放的时间尺度作为分层控制的窗口
强化学习界在理解多巴胺在奖励学习、认知控制和动机方面取得了重大进展。然而,对于不同的DA带宽的功能:快速相位瞬变(毫秒),斜坡(秒)和缓慢的tonic位移(分钟),几乎没有共识。这些动态独立的通道是否传达了不同的决策变量或统一数据处理计算的时间表达式?这些问题是为强化学习中的数据挖掘提出不同机制的竞争框架的核心。这种裂痕不仅反映了概念上的分歧,也反映了带宽有限的测量工具的历史局限性。宽带数据分析量化的新突破承诺对这些理论进行严格的测试。在这里,我们综合了最近的概念和技术进展,并扩展了我们之前的建议,表明数据处理时间尺度反映了层次控制信号,这些信号来自对目标进展的感知和对政策有效性的分布式、电路级推断,其中补补性数据处理代表了跨规划视野和控制层次抽象的目标一致性的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信