Say goodbye to your car: Prevention focus motivates a shift from car to fare-free autonomous public transport

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Guy Moshe Ross
{"title":"Say goodbye to your car: Prevention focus motivates a shift from car to fare-free autonomous public transport","authors":"Guy Moshe Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have examined extensively the potential of fare-free transit as a substitute for car use. However, current knowledge is mainly limited to socio-economic determinants of the choice between these two modes of travel. The motivational dimension of travel behavior and travel mode choice is completely ignored. Another limitation of current knowledge is the paucity of studies on fare-free autonomous public transport as a substitute for private cars. Hence, the objective of this research was twofold: first, to examine how different motivations affect the willingness to switch from car to fare-free autonomous public transport, and second, to explore what role concerns about autonomous driving technology play in this context. To this end, a new theoretical framework has been proposed. This framework draws on regulatory focus theory. According to the theory, goal-directed behavior is regulated by two motivational systems – promotion and prevention. The promotion system is sensitive to growth-related concerns and is associated with a strategic preference for eager means of goal pursuit. The prevention system is sensitive to security-related concerns and is associated with a strategic preference for vigilant means. Most relevant is that a prevention focus is a strong predictor of commitment to collective action to achieve social goals. Based on this, it was hypothesized that individuals with a prevention (vs. promotion) focus would be more willing to switch from car to fare-free autonomous public transport. It was further hypothesized that the willingness to switch to fare-free autonomous public transport would be negatively related to technology concerns, and this relationship would be mediated by the acceptance of autonomous driving technology. These hypotheses were tested in three studies in which regulatory focus was induced (promotion vs. prevention). In Study 1, prevention-focused participants were more willing to give up car use and switch to fare-free autonomous rail transit. In Study 2, there was no difference between prevention-focused and promotion-focused participants in the willingness to switch to fare-free autonomous buses. In Study 3, prevention-focused participants were more willing to give up car use and switch to fare-free shared autonomous robotaxis. In all three studies, acceptance of autonomous driving technology mediated the relationship between technology concerns and the willingness to switch modes of travel from the private car to fare-free autonomous transit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103338"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have examined extensively the potential of fare-free transit as a substitute for car use. However, current knowledge is mainly limited to socio-economic determinants of the choice between these two modes of travel. The motivational dimension of travel behavior and travel mode choice is completely ignored. Another limitation of current knowledge is the paucity of studies on fare-free autonomous public transport as a substitute for private cars. Hence, the objective of this research was twofold: first, to examine how different motivations affect the willingness to switch from car to fare-free autonomous public transport, and second, to explore what role concerns about autonomous driving technology play in this context. To this end, a new theoretical framework has been proposed. This framework draws on regulatory focus theory. According to the theory, goal-directed behavior is regulated by two motivational systems – promotion and prevention. The promotion system is sensitive to growth-related concerns and is associated with a strategic preference for eager means of goal pursuit. The prevention system is sensitive to security-related concerns and is associated with a strategic preference for vigilant means. Most relevant is that a prevention focus is a strong predictor of commitment to collective action to achieve social goals. Based on this, it was hypothesized that individuals with a prevention (vs. promotion) focus would be more willing to switch from car to fare-free autonomous public transport. It was further hypothesized that the willingness to switch to fare-free autonomous public transport would be negatively related to technology concerns, and this relationship would be mediated by the acceptance of autonomous driving technology. These hypotheses were tested in three studies in which regulatory focus was induced (promotion vs. prevention). In Study 1, prevention-focused participants were more willing to give up car use and switch to fare-free autonomous rail transit. In Study 2, there was no difference between prevention-focused and promotion-focused participants in the willingness to switch to fare-free autonomous buses. In Study 3, prevention-focused participants were more willing to give up car use and switch to fare-free shared autonomous robotaxis. In all three studies, acceptance of autonomous driving technology mediated the relationship between technology concerns and the willingness to switch modes of travel from the private car to fare-free autonomous transit.
和你的车说再见:预防的重点促使人们从汽车转向免费的自动公共交通
以前的研究已经广泛地考察了免费交通作为汽车使用替代品的潜力。然而,目前的知识主要限于在这两种旅行方式之间选择的社会经济决定因素。出行行为和出行方式选择的动机维度被完全忽略。目前知识的另一个局限是,关于免费的自动公共交通作为私家车替代品的研究很少。因此,本研究的目的是双重的:首先,研究不同的动机如何影响从汽车转向免费自动公共交通的意愿,其次,探索对自动驾驶技术的关注在这种情况下发挥了什么作用。为此,提出了一个新的理论框架。该框架借鉴了监管焦点理论。根据该理论,目标导向行为受促进和预防两种激励系统的调节。晋升制度对与增长有关的问题很敏感,并与追求目标的迫切手段的战略偏好有关。预防系统对与安全有关的问题很敏感,并与警惕手段的战略偏好有关。最相关的是,预防重点是对实现社会目标的集体行动的承诺的有力预测。基于此,假设关注预防(与促进)的个人更愿意从汽车转向免费的自动公共交通工具。我们进一步假设,转向免费自动驾驶公共交通的意愿与技术担忧呈负相关,而这种关系将被自动驾驶技术的接受程度所中介。这些假设在三项研究中得到了验证,其中诱导了监管焦点(促进与预防)。在研究1中,以预防为重点的参与者更愿意放弃汽车使用,转而使用免费的自动轨道交通。在研究2中,以预防为重点的参与者和以促销为重点的参与者在转向免费自动驾驶公交车的意愿上没有差异。在研究3中,以预防为重点的参与者更愿意放弃汽车使用,转而使用免费共享的自动驾驶出租车。在这三项研究中,对自动驾驶技术的接受程度在技术担忧与从私家车转向免费自动交通的意愿之间起到了中介作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信