Geostatistical and machine learning approaches for high-resolution mapping of vaccination coverage

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
C. Edson Utazi , Ortis Yankey , Somnath Chaudhuri , Iyanuloluwa D. Olowe , M. Carolina Danovaro-Holliday , Attila N. Lazar , Andrew J. Tatem
{"title":"Geostatistical and machine learning approaches for high-resolution mapping of vaccination coverage","authors":"C. Edson Utazi ,&nbsp;Ortis Yankey ,&nbsp;Somnath Chaudhuri ,&nbsp;Iyanuloluwa D. Olowe ,&nbsp;M. Carolina Danovaro-Holliday ,&nbsp;Attila N. Lazar ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Tatem","doi":"10.1016/j.sste.2025.100744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, there has been a growing interest in the production of high-resolution maps of vaccination coverage. These maps have been useful for uncovering geographic inequities in coverage and improving targeting of interventions to reach marginalized populations. Different methodological approaches have been developed for producing these maps using mostly geolocated household survey data and geospatial covariate information. However, it remains unclear how much the predicted coverage maps produced by the various methods differ, and which methods yield more reliable estimates. Here, we explore the predictive performance of these methods and resulting implications for spatial prioritization to fill this gap. Using Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey as a case study, we generate 1 × 1 km and district level maps of indicators of vaccination coverage using geostatistical, machine learning (ML) and hybrid methods and evaluate predictive performance via cross-validation. Our results show similar predictive performance for five of the seven methods investigated, although two geostatistical approaches are the best performing methods. The worst-performing methods are two ML approaches. We find marked differences in spatial prioritization using these methods, which could potentially result in missing important underserved populations, although broad similarities exist. Our study can help guide map production for other health and development metrics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46645,"journal":{"name":"Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 100744"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877584525000358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, there has been a growing interest in the production of high-resolution maps of vaccination coverage. These maps have been useful for uncovering geographic inequities in coverage and improving targeting of interventions to reach marginalized populations. Different methodological approaches have been developed for producing these maps using mostly geolocated household survey data and geospatial covariate information. However, it remains unclear how much the predicted coverage maps produced by the various methods differ, and which methods yield more reliable estimates. Here, we explore the predictive performance of these methods and resulting implications for spatial prioritization to fill this gap. Using Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey as a case study, we generate 1 × 1 km and district level maps of indicators of vaccination coverage using geostatistical, machine learning (ML) and hybrid methods and evaluate predictive performance via cross-validation. Our results show similar predictive performance for five of the seven methods investigated, although two geostatistical approaches are the best performing methods. The worst-performing methods are two ML approaches. We find marked differences in spatial prioritization using these methods, which could potentially result in missing important underserved populations, although broad similarities exist. Our study can help guide map production for other health and development metrics.
用于疫苗接种覆盖率高分辨率制图的地质统计学和机器学习方法
最近,人们对制作疫苗接种覆盖率的高分辨率地图越来越感兴趣。这些地图有助于揭示覆盖范围的地域不平等,并改善针对边缘化人群的干预措施的针对性。已经开发了不同的方法方法来制作这些地图,主要使用地理位置的住户调查数据和地理空间协变量信息。然而,目前还不清楚不同方法预测的覆盖范围图有多大差异,以及哪种方法产生更可靠的估计。在这里,我们探讨这些方法的预测性能和由此产生的空间优先级的影响,以填补这一空白。以尼日利亚人口与健康调查为例,我们使用地理统计学、机器学习(ML)和混合方法生成了疫苗接种覆盖率指标的1 × 1公里和区级地图,并通过交叉验证评估预测性能。我们的研究结果表明,七种方法中有五种方法的预测性能相似,尽管两种地质统计学方法是表现最好的方法。表现最差的方法是两种机器学习方法。我们发现使用这些方法在空间优先排序上存在显著差异,尽管存在广泛的相似性,但这可能会导致遗漏重要的服务不足人群。我们的研究可以帮助指导其他健康和发展指标的地图制作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology
Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信