Gabriela dos Santos de Souza PhD , Rose Löbell MSc , Gustavo do Nascimento Petter MSc , Michele Forgiarini Saccol PhD , Carlos Bolli Mota PhD
{"title":"An instruction as a modifier of dynamic knee valgus in adolescents with patellofemoral pain","authors":"Gabriela dos Santos de Souza PhD , Rose Löbell MSc , Gustavo do Nascimento Petter MSc , Michele Forgiarini Saccol PhD , Carlos Bolli Mota PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent condition among adolescents. An altered neuromuscular control, particularly poor control of dynamic knee valgus (DKV), can potentially exacerbate or trigger PFP. The present study aimed to analyze the effects of instruction in a functional test on DKV control, gluteus medius (Gmed) muscle activity, and pain in adolescents with PFP.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Quasi-experimental design. Fourteen lower limbs with PFP (PFPG) and 12 lower limbs in the control group (CG) were evaluated. The Frontal Plane Projection Angle (FPPA) and Gmed activation were evaluated during the Lateral Step Down test through a motion analysis system and surface electromyography, respectively, before and after the DKV instruction. Pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The CG was assessed only in the pre-test condition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The instruction decreased (−72 %) the FPPA value (p < 0.001, effect size = 1.8, power = 0.99). Responsiveness was noted in 92.9 % of the lower limbs. Post-test, the PFPG demonstrated a similar pattern to the CG regarding DKV (p = 0.388). Activation of Gmed was higher in the PFPG compared to the CG in the pre-instruction (p = 0.03) but did not change post-instruction (p = 0.08, effect size = 0.44, power = 0.20). The responsiveness for Gmed activation was 71.4 %. Reported pain did not changed (p = 0.172, effect size = 0.46, power = 0.22).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An instruction promotes better control of DKV movements. However, the instruction did not alter Gmed muscle activity or reported pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 119-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a prevalent condition among adolescents. An altered neuromuscular control, particularly poor control of dynamic knee valgus (DKV), can potentially exacerbate or trigger PFP. The present study aimed to analyze the effects of instruction in a functional test on DKV control, gluteus medius (Gmed) muscle activity, and pain in adolescents with PFP.
Materials and methods
Quasi-experimental design. Fourteen lower limbs with PFP (PFPG) and 12 lower limbs in the control group (CG) were evaluated. The Frontal Plane Projection Angle (FPPA) and Gmed activation were evaluated during the Lateral Step Down test through a motion analysis system and surface electromyography, respectively, before and after the DKV instruction. Pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The CG was assessed only in the pre-test condition.
Results
The instruction decreased (−72 %) the FPPA value (p < 0.001, effect size = 1.8, power = 0.99). Responsiveness was noted in 92.9 % of the lower limbs. Post-test, the PFPG demonstrated a similar pattern to the CG regarding DKV (p = 0.388). Activation of Gmed was higher in the PFPG compared to the CG in the pre-instruction (p = 0.03) but did not change post-instruction (p = 0.08, effect size = 0.44, power = 0.20). The responsiveness for Gmed activation was 71.4 %. Reported pain did not changed (p = 0.172, effect size = 0.46, power = 0.22).
Conclusions
An instruction promotes better control of DKV movements. However, the instruction did not alter Gmed muscle activity or reported pain.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina