Assessment of co-digestion of poultry litter and swine wastewater: the effect of enriched inoculum on biogas production

IF 2.4 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Juliana Gaio Somer, Franciele Natividade Luiz, Tiago Joelzer Marteres, Rafaela Faust Meyer, Suzan Prado Fernandes Bernal, Jackeline Tatiane Gotardo, Gustavo Henrique Pedroso, Michel Rodrigo Zambrano Passarini, Marcela Boroski
{"title":"Assessment of co-digestion of poultry litter and swine wastewater: the effect of enriched inoculum on biogas production","authors":"Juliana Gaio Somer,&nbsp;Franciele Natividade Luiz,&nbsp;Tiago Joelzer Marteres,&nbsp;Rafaela Faust Meyer,&nbsp;Suzan Prado Fernandes Bernal,&nbsp;Jackeline Tatiane Gotardo,&nbsp;Gustavo Henrique Pedroso,&nbsp;Michel Rodrigo Zambrano Passarini,&nbsp;Marcela Boroski","doi":"10.1002/jctb.7921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\n \n <p>Co-digestion of substrates represents a viable strategy to enhance biogas production. This study evaluates biogas generation from the liquid fraction obtained through phase separation of co-digested swine manure and poultry litter, to assess the influence of the inoculum-to-substrate ratio (ISR) and to analyze the effect of microbial inoculum enrichment on the anaerobic digestion process. Methane production potential tests were conducted using a Doehlert experimental design, with co-digestions comprising 0–40% (w/w) poultry litter, and ISR levels of 2, 1.25 and 0.5.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The highest methane production values (286–284 NL kgVS<sup>−1</sup>) were achieved in co-digestions containing 10% to 20% (w/w) poultry litter, conditions that are compatible with the use of covered lagoon or continuous stirred tank reactor-type digesters. In the microbial inoculum enrichment study, a 34% increase in methane production was observed compared to the use of standard inoculum.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> CONCLUSIONS</h3>\n \n <p>The co-digestion of swine manure and poultry litter, followed by phase separation and anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction, proved to be a feasible strategy, achieving up to a sevenfold increase in methane production per ton of added substrate. Microbial enrichment further promoted a significant increase in methane yield; however, this approach requires further development for full-scale application. Gompertz kinetic modeling produced results closely matching the experimental data. © 2025 The Author(s). <i>Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology</i> published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology","volume":"100 9","pages":"1863-1872"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jctb.7921","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jctb.7921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Co-digestion of substrates represents a viable strategy to enhance biogas production. This study evaluates biogas generation from the liquid fraction obtained through phase separation of co-digested swine manure and poultry litter, to assess the influence of the inoculum-to-substrate ratio (ISR) and to analyze the effect of microbial inoculum enrichment on the anaerobic digestion process. Methane production potential tests were conducted using a Doehlert experimental design, with co-digestions comprising 0–40% (w/w) poultry litter, and ISR levels of 2, 1.25 and 0.5.

RESULTS

The highest methane production values (286–284 NL kgVS−1) were achieved in co-digestions containing 10% to 20% (w/w) poultry litter, conditions that are compatible with the use of covered lagoon or continuous stirred tank reactor-type digesters. In the microbial inoculum enrichment study, a 34% increase in methane production was observed compared to the use of standard inoculum.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-digestion of swine manure and poultry litter, followed by phase separation and anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction, proved to be a feasible strategy, achieving up to a sevenfold increase in methane production per ton of added substrate. Microbial enrichment further promoted a significant increase in methane yield; however, this approach requires further development for full-scale application. Gompertz kinetic modeling produced results closely matching the experimental data. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

禽畜粪便与生猪废水共消化的评价:富集接种物对产气的影响
底物共消化是提高沼气产量的可行策略。本研究对共消化猪粪与禽畜粪便相分离得到的液体馏分产沼气进行了评价,评估了接种物与底物比(ISR)的影响,并分析了微生物接种物富集对厌氧消化过程的影响。试验采用Doehlert试验设计,共消化量为0 ~ 40% (w/w), ISR水平分别为2、1.25和0.5。结果含10% ~ 20% (w/w)禽肉残渣共消化时,产甲烷量最高(286 ~ 284 NL kgVS−1),与使用有盖泻湖或连续搅拌槽式反应器相适应。在微生物接种物富集研究中,与使用标准接种物相比,观察到甲烷产量增加了34%。结论猪粪和家禽粪便共消化,然后进行相分离和液体部分厌氧消化,是一种可行的策略,每吨添加底物的甲烷产量可提高7倍。微生物富集进一步促进了甲烷产量的显著提高;然而,这种方法需要进一步开发才能全面应用。Gompertz动力学建模的结果与实验数据非常吻合。©2025作者。由John Wiley &; Sons Ltd代表美国化学工业学会(SCI)出版的化学技术与生物技术杂志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
268
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology(JCTB) is an international, inter-disciplinary peer-reviewed journal concerned with the application of scientific discoveries and advancements in chemical and biological technology that aim towards economically and environmentally sustainable industrial processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信