Are monopolies efficient setters of ethical standards?

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Yahel Giat, Eran Manes
{"title":"Are monopolies efficient setters of ethical standards?","authors":"Yahel Giat,&nbsp;Eran Manes","doi":"10.1007/s10479-025-06600-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We propose a novel analytical framework to study the equilibrium determination of ethical standards when a boycott movement (BM) that represents ethically concerned consumers pressures producers to scale back the production of objectionable products, at the expense of other, ethically indifferent, consumer groups. Focusing on monopolies, we find that under a fixed price regime monopolies—depending on the price—are either over or under appeasing the BM. If monopolies are free to set the price and boycotters substitute ethical violations with price reductions, then monopolies’ distortionary effect is twofold: (i) they are less likely to appease the BM compared to the social planner, and (ii) whenever they choose to appease, they over appease relative to the social optimum. Our results provide theoretical foundations for why producers in industries with abnormal customer willingness to pay such as luxury brands, are less likely to appease. The results also suggest that managers can use pricing mechanisms to exploit ethical demands of their customers. Conversely, governments should consider the welfare loss to the remaining consumer base caused by this exploitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Operations Research","volume":"351 3","pages":"1803 - 1829"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-025-06600-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a novel analytical framework to study the equilibrium determination of ethical standards when a boycott movement (BM) that represents ethically concerned consumers pressures producers to scale back the production of objectionable products, at the expense of other, ethically indifferent, consumer groups. Focusing on monopolies, we find that under a fixed price regime monopolies—depending on the price—are either over or under appeasing the BM. If monopolies are free to set the price and boycotters substitute ethical violations with price reductions, then monopolies’ distortionary effect is twofold: (i) they are less likely to appease the BM compared to the social planner, and (ii) whenever they choose to appease, they over appease relative to the social optimum. Our results provide theoretical foundations for why producers in industries with abnormal customer willingness to pay such as luxury brands, are less likely to appease. The results also suggest that managers can use pricing mechanisms to exploit ethical demands of their customers. Conversely, governments should consider the welfare loss to the remaining consumer base caused by this exploitation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

垄断是道德标准的有效制定者吗?
我们提出了一个新的分析框架来研究当抵制运动(BM)代表道德关注的消费者向生产者施压,以牺牲其他道德漠不关心的消费者群体为代价,减少不良产品的生产时,道德标准的均衡确定。专注于垄断,我们发现,在固定价格制度下,垄断——取决于价格——要么超过,要么低于对BM的绥靖。如果垄断企业可以自由定价,而抵制者以降价来替代违反道德的行为,那么垄断企业的扭曲效应是双重的:(i)与社会规划者相比,它们不太可能安抚BM; (ii)每当它们选择安抚时,相对于社会最优,它们就会过度安抚。我们的研究结果为为什么在消费者支付意愿异常的行业(如奢侈品牌),生产商不太可能安抚消费者提供了理论基础。研究结果还表明,管理者可以利用定价机制来利用客户的道德需求。相反,政府应该考虑这种剥削对剩余消费者群体造成的福利损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Operations Research
Annals of Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
596
审稿时长
8.4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Operations Research publishes peer-reviewed original articles dealing with key aspects of operations research, including theory, practice, and computation. The journal publishes full-length research articles, short notes, expositions and surveys, reports on computational studies, and case studies that present new and innovative practical applications. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes periodic special volumes that focus on defined fields of operations research, ranging from the highly theoretical to the algorithmic and the applied. These volumes have one or more Guest Editors who are responsible for collecting the papers and overseeing the refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信