Reed T. Jenkins , Binuri L. Hapuarachchy , Manuj M. Shah, Emily L. Larson, Alice L. Zhou, David J. Farhat, Jessica M. Ruck, Helene Rached, Elizabeth A. King, Benjamin Philosophe, Al-Faraaz Kassam
{"title":"Outcomes of liver transplants utilizing donors from outside the contiguous United States","authors":"Reed T. Jenkins , Binuri L. Hapuarachchy , Manuj M. Shah, Emily L. Larson, Alice L. Zhou, David J. Farhat, Jessica M. Ruck, Helene Rached, Elizabeth A. King, Benjamin Philosophe, Al-Faraaz Kassam","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Expanding the liver donor pool includes reconsidering geographic characteristics. We evaluated demographics, trends, and outcomes of transplants from donors outside the contiguous US.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult liver-only transplants from 2010 to 2022 were categorized by donor location (mainland US vs. non-mainland) using national registry data. Post-transplant survival was evaluated using time-to-event analysis, univariate and multivariable Cox regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1531 (1.5 %) liver transplants utilized non-mainland organs (991 performed in mainland US). Non-mainland to mainland donors were older, smoked less, had a lower BMI, and less steatosis (all p < 0.05). Non-mainland organs traveled further (1241 vs. 84 miles,p < 0.01) with longer ischemic times (8.6 vs. 5.9 h,p < 0.01). Length of stay (p = 0.80) and acute rejection (p = 0.14) did not differ. Non-mainland recipients had similar survival at 1-(aHR 1.02, p = 0.85), 5-(aHR 0.93, p = 0.38), and 10-years (aHR 0.96, p = 0.56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Non-mainland recipients had similar LOS and survival despite longer distance and cold ischemic time, emphasizing further consideration for non-mainland transplantation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 116568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025003915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Expanding the liver donor pool includes reconsidering geographic characteristics. We evaluated demographics, trends, and outcomes of transplants from donors outside the contiguous US.
Methods
Adult liver-only transplants from 2010 to 2022 were categorized by donor location (mainland US vs. non-mainland) using national registry data. Post-transplant survival was evaluated using time-to-event analysis, univariate and multivariable Cox regression.
Results
1531 (1.5 %) liver transplants utilized non-mainland organs (991 performed in mainland US). Non-mainland to mainland donors were older, smoked less, had a lower BMI, and less steatosis (all p < 0.05). Non-mainland organs traveled further (1241 vs. 84 miles,p < 0.01) with longer ischemic times (8.6 vs. 5.9 h,p < 0.01). Length of stay (p = 0.80) and acute rejection (p = 0.14) did not differ. Non-mainland recipients had similar survival at 1-(aHR 1.02, p = 0.85), 5-(aHR 0.93, p = 0.38), and 10-years (aHR 0.96, p = 0.56).
Conclusion
Non-mainland recipients had similar LOS and survival despite longer distance and cold ischemic time, emphasizing further consideration for non-mainland transplantation.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.