Scapular kinematics variability in individuals with and without rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: A systematic review with multilevel meta-regression
Rubén Fernández-Matías , Jorge Ballesteros-Frutos , Pablo Gallardo-Zamora , Néstor Requejo-Salinas , Iván Caballero-Pozo , Paula Ludewig , Enrique Lluch-Girbés
{"title":"Scapular kinematics variability in individuals with and without rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: A systematic review with multilevel meta-regression","authors":"Rubén Fernández-Matías , Jorge Ballesteros-Frutos , Pablo Gallardo-Zamora , Néstor Requejo-Salinas , Iván Caballero-Pozo , Paula Ludewig , Enrique Lluch-Girbés","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Traditionally, great importance has been placed on abnormal scapula kinematics in the approach to treatment of patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To review the literature regarding the variability of scapular position and movement in individuals with and without RCRSP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was performed on 18<sup>th</sup> April 2024 on nine databases. Studies evaluating scapular kinematics during arm elevation in healthy individuals and those with RCRSP were included, with a focus on 3D non-surface tracking systems.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty studies were included. In asymptomatic individuals, the estimated scapular position at rest was 1.00° to 11.58° of upward rotation (UR), 4.82° to 11.24° of anterior tilt, and 26.84° to 39.05° of internal rotation. During arm elevation, the scapula moves from the very beginning (no setting phase) towards UR (final position, 47.88° to 61.00° at 150° of elevation) and posterior tilt (final position, 10.78° to 11.96° at 150° of elevation), and there is a trend towards external rotation. The estimated scapulohumeral rhythm for humerothoracic elevation and scapular UR ranged from 2.86:1 to 3.13:1. There was very low certainty of evidence for differences in individuals with RCRSP in scapula resting position for UR (mean difference, -6.11°; 95 % CI: -7.36°, -4.86°), and internal rotation (mean difference, 4.21°; 95 % CI: 0.68°, 7.74°), that were below the width of the 95 % prediction intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This meta-analysis has debunked the myth of the setting phase and the constant 3:1 scapulohumeral rhythm. There is great variability in scapular kinematics, making it difficult to detect abnormal patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Prospero registration number</h3><div>CRD42021259479</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"29 6","pages":"Article 101261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355525000784","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Traditionally, great importance has been placed on abnormal scapula kinematics in the approach to treatment of patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP).
Objective
To review the literature regarding the variability of scapular position and movement in individuals with and without RCRSP.
Methods
A systematic search was performed on 18th April 2024 on nine databases. Studies evaluating scapular kinematics during arm elevation in healthy individuals and those with RCRSP were included, with a focus on 3D non-surface tracking systems.
Results
Twenty studies were included. In asymptomatic individuals, the estimated scapular position at rest was 1.00° to 11.58° of upward rotation (UR), 4.82° to 11.24° of anterior tilt, and 26.84° to 39.05° of internal rotation. During arm elevation, the scapula moves from the very beginning (no setting phase) towards UR (final position, 47.88° to 61.00° at 150° of elevation) and posterior tilt (final position, 10.78° to 11.96° at 150° of elevation), and there is a trend towards external rotation. The estimated scapulohumeral rhythm for humerothoracic elevation and scapular UR ranged from 2.86:1 to 3.13:1. There was very low certainty of evidence for differences in individuals with RCRSP in scapula resting position for UR (mean difference, -6.11°; 95 % CI: -7.36°, -4.86°), and internal rotation (mean difference, 4.21°; 95 % CI: 0.68°, 7.74°), that were below the width of the 95 % prediction intervals.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis has debunked the myth of the setting phase and the constant 3:1 scapulohumeral rhythm. There is great variability in scapular kinematics, making it difficult to detect abnormal patterns.
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.