Challenges of small modular reactors: A comprehensive exploration of economic and waste uncertainties associated with U.S. small modular reactor designs
{"title":"Challenges of small modular reactors: A comprehensive exploration of economic and waste uncertainties associated with U.S. small modular reactor designs","authors":"Philseo Kim , Allison Macfarlane","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.105989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article presents a comprehensive analysis and review of the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and nuclear waste generation from small modular reactors (SMRs) designed in the United States. The analysis presented here offers a perspective on the uncertainties surrounding the calculation of LCOE for SMRs. Initially, the paper discusses and calculates the capital costs, front-end fuel cycle costs, operating and maintenance expenses, and nuclear waste production of four distinct types of SMRs—boiling light water, pressurized light water, high-temperature gas-cooled, and sodium fast reactor types— based on designs by four different manufacturers in the United States. Our review and analysis indicate there is considerable uncertainty in LCOE estimations of SMRs, particularly emphasizing that non-light water designs are likely to be more expensive in fuel cycle costs and have greater uncertainties in nuclear waste management compared to light water reactor designs. This comprehensive analysis of SMRs significantly broadens our understanding of their economic complexities and the implications these pose for deployment in the foreseeable future. Lastly, our estimates suggest that both SMRs and large nuclear reactors will require revolutionary approaches to reduce the capital cost overruns to be cost competitive with other energy sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 105989"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025003877","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article presents a comprehensive analysis and review of the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and nuclear waste generation from small modular reactors (SMRs) designed in the United States. The analysis presented here offers a perspective on the uncertainties surrounding the calculation of LCOE for SMRs. Initially, the paper discusses and calculates the capital costs, front-end fuel cycle costs, operating and maintenance expenses, and nuclear waste production of four distinct types of SMRs—boiling light water, pressurized light water, high-temperature gas-cooled, and sodium fast reactor types— based on designs by four different manufacturers in the United States. Our review and analysis indicate there is considerable uncertainty in LCOE estimations of SMRs, particularly emphasizing that non-light water designs are likely to be more expensive in fuel cycle costs and have greater uncertainties in nuclear waste management compared to light water reactor designs. This comprehensive analysis of SMRs significantly broadens our understanding of their economic complexities and the implications these pose for deployment in the foreseeable future. Lastly, our estimates suggest that both SMRs and large nuclear reactors will require revolutionary approaches to reduce the capital cost overruns to be cost competitive with other energy sources.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.