Kevin E. Tiede , Hellen Temme , Lena Lehrer , Cornelia Betsch
{"title":"Enhancing perceived effectiveness can increase climate policy acceptance","authors":"Kevin E. Tiede , Hellen Temme , Lena Lehrer , Cornelia Betsch","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public acceptance is crucial for the successful implementation of climate policies; hence, it is essential to understand its determinants and how to boost it. In this research, we aim to test the causality of perceived effectiveness on policy acceptance. For this purpose, we experimentally manipulated perceived effectiveness by providing information about the objective effectiveness of a climate policy. In a preregistered experiment (<em>N</em> = 953; T1), participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of a speed limit on German highways. Beforehand, participants in the information condition were given details about the speed limit's effectiveness in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> reductions, whereas those in the control condition were not. Participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance again 1.5 years later (<em>n</em> = 334; T2). We found that providing vs. not providing such information led to higher perceived effectiveness but not greater policy acceptance at T1. However, among those participants without prior knowledge of the speed limit's effectiveness, providing the information positively affected both perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance at T1. Among those people who learned about the effectiveness of the policy at T1, perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance were higher when they could (vs. could not) recall the effectiveness information after 1.5 years (i.e., at T2). Our results suggest that perceived effectiveness causally affects policy acceptance in the climate domain. Explaining the objective effectiveness of climate policies—and doing so in such a way that people can remember the information over time—thus offers a promising approach for policymakers to increase public acceptance of climate policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102725"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Public acceptance is crucial for the successful implementation of climate policies; hence, it is essential to understand its determinants and how to boost it. In this research, we aim to test the causality of perceived effectiveness on policy acceptance. For this purpose, we experimentally manipulated perceived effectiveness by providing information about the objective effectiveness of a climate policy. In a preregistered experiment (N = 953; T1), participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of a speed limit on German highways. Beforehand, participants in the information condition were given details about the speed limit's effectiveness in terms of CO2 reductions, whereas those in the control condition were not. Participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance again 1.5 years later (n = 334; T2). We found that providing vs. not providing such information led to higher perceived effectiveness but not greater policy acceptance at T1. However, among those participants without prior knowledge of the speed limit's effectiveness, providing the information positively affected both perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance at T1. Among those people who learned about the effectiveness of the policy at T1, perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance were higher when they could (vs. could not) recall the effectiveness information after 1.5 years (i.e., at T2). Our results suggest that perceived effectiveness causally affects policy acceptance in the climate domain. Explaining the objective effectiveness of climate policies—and doing so in such a way that people can remember the information over time—thus offers a promising approach for policymakers to increase public acceptance of climate policies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space