A Smartphone Is Not Enough: Telehealth Attendance and the Digital Divide

IF 3.3
James Labadorf, Matthew Nichols, Tayana Williams, Celina Cunanan, Brian D'Anza
{"title":"A Smartphone Is Not Enough: Telehealth Attendance and the Digital Divide","authors":"James Labadorf,&nbsp;Matthew Nichols,&nbsp;Tayana Williams,&nbsp;Celina Cunanan,&nbsp;Brian D'Anza","doi":"10.1002/hcs2.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth has emerged as a powerful tool for managing chronic diseases and mental health conditions, offering increased access to care and improved patient outcomes. However, inequities in digital connectivity and technological resources have created significant disparities in access to these potentially life-changing services, disproportionately impacting marginalized and minoritized communities across the globe.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data on 473,716 telehealth encounters occurring between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023 were retrieved from the electronic health records (EHR) system used by University Hospitals. These encounters were classified into three groups: attended, canceled, and no-show. Relative risk was calculated based on age, sex, and race, and a multivariate linear regression was performed with age, sex, and race as inputs, to determine their effect on the encounter outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our analysis identified significant differences in relative risk between demographic groups. Patients 20–39 years of age had a high relative risk of cancellation and no-show, and Black patients demonstrated the highest relative risk for cancellation and no-show. The regression analysis illustrated a statistically significant link between no-shows and patients with a cellular plan with no other internet subscription (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), smartphone ownership (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and not having a computer (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the clinical repercussions of the digital divide, as patients relying on a mobile phone and data plan to attend telehealth visits were more likely to no-show. Current disparities in digital connectivity for historically marginalized populations heightens the risk of creating a digital underclass. There is evidence this study may be applicable in multiple countries across the world. Further research on the causes of the observed no-shows is necessary to ensure equitable delivery of digital healthcare services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100601,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Science","volume":"4 4","pages":"259-268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hcs2.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hcs2.70033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Telehealth has emerged as a powerful tool for managing chronic diseases and mental health conditions, offering increased access to care and improved patient outcomes. However, inequities in digital connectivity and technological resources have created significant disparities in access to these potentially life-changing services, disproportionately impacting marginalized and minoritized communities across the globe.

Methods

Data on 473,716 telehealth encounters occurring between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023 were retrieved from the electronic health records (EHR) system used by University Hospitals. These encounters were classified into three groups: attended, canceled, and no-show. Relative risk was calculated based on age, sex, and race, and a multivariate linear regression was performed with age, sex, and race as inputs, to determine their effect on the encounter outcome.

Results

Our analysis identified significant differences in relative risk between demographic groups. Patients 20–39 years of age had a high relative risk of cancellation and no-show, and Black patients demonstrated the highest relative risk for cancellation and no-show. The regression analysis illustrated a statistically significant link between no-shows and patients with a cellular plan with no other internet subscription (p < 0.001), smartphone ownership (p < 0.001), and not having a computer (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

This study highlights the clinical repercussions of the digital divide, as patients relying on a mobile phone and data plan to attend telehealth visits were more likely to no-show. Current disparities in digital connectivity for historically marginalized populations heightens the risk of creating a digital underclass. There is evidence this study may be applicable in multiple countries across the world. Further research on the causes of the observed no-shows is necessary to ensure equitable delivery of digital healthcare services.

Abstract Image

智能手机是不够的:远程医疗服务和数字鸿沟
远程保健已成为管理慢性病和精神健康状况的有力工具,提供了更多获得护理的机会,并改善了患者的预后。然而,数字连接和技术资源方面的不平等造成了在获得这些可能改变生活的服务方面的巨大差距,对全球边缘化和少数群体造成了不成比例的影响。方法从大学附属医院电子健康记录(EHR)系统中检索2022年1月1日至2023年6月30日发生的473,716次远程医疗就诊数据。这些会面被分为三类:出席、取消和缺席。根据年龄、性别和种族计算相对风险,并以年龄、性别和种族作为输入进行多元线性回归,以确定其对遭遇结果的影响。结果:我们的分析确定了不同人群的相对风险有显著差异。20-39岁的患者有较高的取消和未到的相对风险,黑人患者表现出最高的取消和未到的相对风险。回归分析表明,在没有其他互联网订阅的手机计划(p < 0.001)、拥有智能手机(p < 0.001)和没有电脑(p < 0.05)之间存在统计学上显著的联系。这项研究强调了数字鸿沟的临床影响,因为依赖移动电话和数据计划参加远程医疗就诊的患者更有可能缺席。历史上被边缘化的人群目前在数字连接方面的差距加剧了形成数字底层阶级的风险。有证据表明,这项研究可能适用于全球多个国家。为确保公平地提供数字医疗保健服务,有必要进一步研究所观察到的未到访者原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信