Knowledge of sexual and reproductive health and rights among University of Rwanda students: a cross-sectional study.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-08-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001607
Alice Muhayimana, Theoneste Ntalindwa, Aline Uwase, Kaberuka Gerard, Jean Damascene Niringiyumukiza, Allen Jean de la Croix Ingabire, Emmanuel Nzabonimana, Irene Josephine Kearns, Marie Laetitia Ishimwe Bazakare, Fulgence Maniriho, Jean de Dieu Habimana, Vedaste Bagweneza, Mathias Nduwingoma
{"title":"Knowledge of sexual and reproductive health and rights among University of Rwanda students: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Alice Muhayimana, Theoneste Ntalindwa, Aline Uwase, Kaberuka Gerard, Jean Damascene Niringiyumukiza, Allen Jean de la Croix Ingabire, Emmanuel Nzabonimana, Irene Josephine Kearns, Marie Laetitia Ishimwe Bazakare, Fulgence Maniriho, Jean de Dieu Habimana, Vedaste Bagweneza, Mathias Nduwingoma","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor knowledge of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) among university students has been constantly reported in low-income and middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess University of Rwanda (UR) students' knowledge on SRHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved an online survey of 441 students across UR. Data were collected using a validated 50-item SRHR knowledge questionnaire via Moodle. Data were cleaned and analysed using STATA. Descriptive and inferential statistics, such as a bivariate logistic regression model and multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination, were used for the final model. A P-value of 0.05 with 95% CI limits was considered. The association between explanatory variables and the outcome (SRHR knowledge) was evaluated. A mean cut-off was employed, categorising experiences into a binary outcome (poor and good SRHR knowledge scores). Stepwise backward elimination logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of good SRHR knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the participants (56%) had poor SRHR knowledge. In the bivariate analysis, statistically significant variables included prior exposure to the SRHR course by using YouTube (OR 2.36 (1.12 to 4.97) and radio (OR 3.08 (1.20 to 7.88)), prior learning SRHR courses online (OR 1.92 (1.10 to 3.38)) and participant age group 21-24 years (OR 0.50 (0.27 to 0.93). In the multivariate analysis, prior exposure to the SRHR course through YouTube (adjusted OR (aOR) 5.48 (1.29 to 23.22)) and SRHR prior exposure through radio (aOR 5.56 (1.37 to 23.04)) were associated with SRHR knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendations: </strong>UR students do not have sufficient knowledge of SRHR. Every UR student can benefit from SRHR training from reliable sources so that they can make effective choices regarding their reproductive health.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 2","pages":"e001607"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poor knowledge of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) among university students has been constantly reported in low-income and middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess University of Rwanda (UR) students' knowledge on SRHR.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved an online survey of 441 students across UR. Data were collected using a validated 50-item SRHR knowledge questionnaire via Moodle. Data were cleaned and analysed using STATA. Descriptive and inferential statistics, such as a bivariate logistic regression model and multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination, were used for the final model. A P-value of 0.05 with 95% CI limits was considered. The association between explanatory variables and the outcome (SRHR knowledge) was evaluated. A mean cut-off was employed, categorising experiences into a binary outcome (poor and good SRHR knowledge scores). Stepwise backward elimination logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of good SRHR knowledge.

Results: The majority of the participants (56%) had poor SRHR knowledge. In the bivariate analysis, statistically significant variables included prior exposure to the SRHR course by using YouTube (OR 2.36 (1.12 to 4.97) and radio (OR 3.08 (1.20 to 7.88)), prior learning SRHR courses online (OR 1.92 (1.10 to 3.38)) and participant age group 21-24 years (OR 0.50 (0.27 to 0.93). In the multivariate analysis, prior exposure to the SRHR course through YouTube (adjusted OR (aOR) 5.48 (1.29 to 23.22)) and SRHR prior exposure through radio (aOR 5.56 (1.37 to 23.04)) were associated with SRHR knowledge.

Conclusion and recommendations: UR students do not have sufficient knowledge of SRHR. Every UR student can benefit from SRHR training from reliable sources so that they can make effective choices regarding their reproductive health.

Abstract Image

卢旺达大学学生的性健康和生殖健康及权利知识:一项横断面研究。
背景:在低收入和中等收入国家,不断有报道称大学生对性健康和生殖健康及权利知识匮乏。本研究旨在评估卢旺达大学(UR)学生对SRHR的认知。方法:这项横断面研究包括对大学441名学生的在线调查。数据的收集使用了经过验证的50项SRHR知识问卷。使用STATA对数据进行清理和分析。描述性统计和推理统计,如二元逻辑回归模型和多元逻辑回归与反向消除,用于最终模型。考虑p值为0.05,95% CI限。评估解释变量与结果(SRHR知识)之间的关联。采用平均截止值,将经验分类为二元结果(SRHR知识得分差和好)。逐步后向消除逻辑回归分析,以确定良好的SRHR知识的预测因子。结果:大多数被试(56%)的SRHR知识较差。在双变量分析中,具有统计学意义的变量包括先前通过YouTube (OR 2.36(1.12至4.97)和广播(OR 3.08(1.20至7.88))接触SRHR课程,先前在线学习SRHR课程(OR 1.92(1.10至3.38))和参与者年龄组21-24岁(OR 0.50(0.27至0.93))。在多变量分析中,先前通过YouTube接触SRHR课程(调整OR (aOR) 5.48(1.29 ~ 23.22))和先前通过无线电接触SRHR (aOR 5.56(1.37 ~ 23.04))与SRHR知识相关。结论和建议:UR学生对SRHR的认识不足。努尔大学的每一名学生都可以从可靠来源的性健康和生殖资源培训中受益,以便他们能够在生殖健康方面做出有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信