Comparison of mechanical thrombectomy alone versus post-IV t-PA thrombectomy in acute large artery occlusion within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.

Joonwon Lee, Hyungon Lee, Kyung-Wan Kim, Seung Hwan Kim, Yunhyeok Choi, Sung-Chul Jin
{"title":"Comparison of mechanical thrombectomy alone versus post-IV t-PA thrombectomy in acute large artery occlusion within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.","authors":"Joonwon Lee, Hyungon Lee, Kyung-Wan Kim, Seung Hwan Kim, Yunhyeok Choi, Sung-Chul Jin","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2025.E2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) is commonly used as bridging therapy before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke. However, in practice, some patients undergo MT only after IV t-PA has been fully administered. This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of MT only versus IV t-PA followed by MT within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 190 patients with acute large artery occlusion treated with MT between January 2018 and December 2020. After excluding 53 patients ineligible for IV t-PA. A total of 137 patients were enrolled and categorized into two groups: MT only (n=82, 59.8%) and post-IV t-PA MT (n=55, 40.2%). The primary outcome was successful recanalization; the secondary outcome was a good clinical outcome at 90 days (3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The successful recanalization rates did not significantly differ between the MT-only and post-IV t-PA MT groups (92.7% vs. 89.1%, p=0.466). Good outcomes at 90 days were not statistically different between both groups (58.5% vs. 61.8%, p=0.701). Multivariable analysis identified baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.873; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.806-0.946; p<0.001) and door-to-puncture time (adjusted OR 0.987; 95% CI, 0.978-0.997; p=0.009) as independent predictors of outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, MT alone yielded comparable outcomes to IV t-PA followed by MT in patients treated within 4.5 hours. Direct MT may be a reasonable treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2025.E2025.04.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) is commonly used as bridging therapy before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke. However, in practice, some patients undergo MT only after IV t-PA has been fully administered. This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of MT only versus IV t-PA followed by MT within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 190 patients with acute large artery occlusion treated with MT between January 2018 and December 2020. After excluding 53 patients ineligible for IV t-PA. A total of 137 patients were enrolled and categorized into two groups: MT only (n=82, 59.8%) and post-IV t-PA MT (n=55, 40.2%). The primary outcome was successful recanalization; the secondary outcome was a good clinical outcome at 90 days (3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2).

Results: The successful recanalization rates did not significantly differ between the MT-only and post-IV t-PA MT groups (92.7% vs. 89.1%, p=0.466). Good outcomes at 90 days were not statistically different between both groups (58.5% vs. 61.8%, p=0.701). Multivariable analysis identified baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.873; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.806-0.946; p<0.001) and door-to-puncture time (adjusted OR 0.987; 95% CI, 0.978-0.997; p=0.009) as independent predictors of outcome.

Conclusions: In our study, MT alone yielded comparable outcomes to IV t-PA followed by MT in patients treated within 4.5 hours. Direct MT may be a reasonable treatment strategy.

急性大动脉闭塞4.5小时内机械取栓与静脉注射后t-PA取栓的比较
目的:静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(IV t-PA)是急性缺血性卒中机械取栓(MT)前常用的桥接治疗方法。然而,在实践中,一些患者仅在静脉注射t-PA后才接受MT治疗。本研究旨在比较在症状出现后4.5小时内,单纯MT与静脉注射t-PA后MT的临床和放射学结果。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月期间接受MT治疗的190例急性大动脉闭塞患者。在排除了53例不适合静脉t-PA治疗的患者后。共纳入137例患者,并将其分为两组:单纯MT (n=82, 59.8%)和iv后t-PA MT (n=55, 40.2%)。主要结果为再通成功;次要结局为90天临床预后良好(3个月改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分0-2)。结果:单纯MT组与静脉注射后t-PA MT组再通成功率无显著差异(92.7% vs 89.1%, p=0.466)。两组患者90天的良好预后无统计学差异(58.5% vs. 61.8%, p=0.701)。多变量分析确定基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分(调整优势比(OR) 0.873;95%置信区间(CI), 0.806-0.946;结论:在我们的研究中,在4.5小时内治疗的患者中,单纯MT与静脉注射t-PA后MT的结果相当。直接MT可能是一种合理的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信