Are Oritavancin and Dalbavancin More Cost Effective for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center?

Danna Hanks, Tomasz Z Jodlowski, Karl Madaras-Kelly, Jennifer Diaz, Nicholas Vietri
{"title":"Are Oritavancin and Dalbavancin More Cost Effective for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center?","authors":"Danna Hanks, Tomasz Z Jodlowski, Karl Madaras-Kelly, Jennifer Diaz, Nicholas Vietri","doi":"10.12788/fp.0571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dalbavancin and oritavancin are long-acting lipoglycopeptides frequently used off-label to avoid outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy or placement of a central line at hospital discharge for patients with infections. Although dalbavancin and oritavancin have higher acquisition costs compared with commonly used antibiotics, such as vancomycin and daptomycin, they may reduce overall cost of health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, cost-minimization analysis compared treatment with oritavancin and dalbavancin vs vancomycin and daptomycin. Adult patients treated with oritavancin or dalbavancin between September 2017 and November 2022 were matched by indication to patients who received vancomycin or daptomycin. Costs were calculated using a decision tree base model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis: 22 received oritavancin, 15 received dalbavancin, 10 received vancomycin, and 8 received daptomycin. The mean cost of therapy per patient receiving oritavancin, dalbavancin, vancomycin, and daptomycin was $35,630, $59,612, $73,333, and $73,708, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cost of using oritavancin and dalbavancin was lower than that of vancomycin and daptomycin, especially for osteomyelitis. As safety and effectiveness data continue to emerge, the use of long-acting lipoglycopeptides appears to be an increasingly attractive alternative to traditional outpatient antimicrobial therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"42 6","pages":"236-243b"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dalbavancin and oritavancin are long-acting lipoglycopeptides frequently used off-label to avoid outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy or placement of a central line at hospital discharge for patients with infections. Although dalbavancin and oritavancin have higher acquisition costs compared with commonly used antibiotics, such as vancomycin and daptomycin, they may reduce overall cost of health care.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cost-minimization analysis compared treatment with oritavancin and dalbavancin vs vancomycin and daptomycin. Adult patients treated with oritavancin or dalbavancin between September 2017 and November 2022 were matched by indication to patients who received vancomycin or daptomycin. Costs were calculated using a decision tree base model.

Results: Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis: 22 received oritavancin, 15 received dalbavancin, 10 received vancomycin, and 8 received daptomycin. The mean cost of therapy per patient receiving oritavancin, dalbavancin, vancomycin, and daptomycin was $35,630, $59,612, $73,333, and $73,708, respectively.

Conclusions: The cost of using oritavancin and dalbavancin was lower than that of vancomycin and daptomycin, especially for osteomyelitis. As safety and effectiveness data continue to emerge, the use of long-acting lipoglycopeptides appears to be an increasingly attractive alternative to traditional outpatient antimicrobial therapy.

在退伍军人事务医疗中心,奥利塔万新和达尔巴万新在门诊肠外抗菌药物治疗中是否更具成本效益?
背景:Dalbavancin和oritavancin是长效脂糖肽,经常在说明书外使用,以避免门诊外肠外抗菌治疗或在感染患者出院时放置中央静脉导管。与万古霉素和达托霉素等常用抗生素相比,达巴万星和奥利塔万星的获取成本较高,但它们可能降低医疗保健的总体成本。方法:采用单中心、回顾性、成本最小化的分析方法,比较奥利万新、达巴万辛与万古霉素、达托霉素的治疗效果。2017年9月至2022年11月期间接受奥利万新或达巴万新治疗的成年患者与接受万古霉素或达托霉素治疗的患者进行适应证匹配。使用决策树基础模型计算成本。结果:纳入分析的55例患者中,奥利万星22例,达巴万星15例,万古霉素10例,达托霉素8例。每位接受奥利塔万新、达巴万新、万古霉素和达托霉素的患者的平均治疗费用分别为35,630美元、59,612美元、73,333美元和73708美元。结论:奥利万星和达巴万星治疗骨髓炎的成本低于万古霉素和达托霉素。随着安全性和有效性数据的不断出现,使用长效脂糖肽似乎是传统门诊抗菌治疗的一种越来越有吸引力的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信