Elise S Tremblay, Stephanie Argetsinger, Fang Zhang, Dennis Ross-Degnan, J Frank Wharam
{"title":"Trends in insulin out-of-pocket costs and use disparities, 2008-2021.","authors":"Elise S Tremblay, Stephanie Argetsinger, Fang Zhang, Dennis Ross-Degnan, J Frank Wharam","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess trends in insulin out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, use, and disparities among commercially insured patients from 2008 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective time series from a national insurance database, with members in all US states, including data from 2008 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Insulin OOP costs and 30-day equivalent fills per year were quantified among insulin users aged 12 to 64 years, stratified by income (low- vs high-poverty zip code) and health plan type (high-deductible health plans with savings options [HDHP/SO] vs not). Participants were commercially insured insulin users aged 12 to 64 years with at least 1 full enrollment year. Characteristics of interest for disparities analysis included income level (low- vs high-poverty zip code) and health plan type (HDHP/SO vs non-HDHP/SO plan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After increases in adjusted mean annual insulin OOP costs from 2008 ($221 per non-HDHP/SO member and $313 per HDHP/SO member) to 2014 ($280 and $496, respectively), HDHP/SO members had persistent relative reductions in insulin use. In 2014, HDHP/SO members had 0.17 fewer annual fills, a disparity that increased until 2019 (0.79) before decreasing slightly by 2021 (-0.55). Lower-income members consistently had fewer insulin fills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insulin OOP cost reduction policies would be more efficient if they targeted HDHP/SO plan members and low-income patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 8","pages":"408-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess trends in insulin out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, use, and disparities among commercially insured patients from 2008 to 2021.
Study design: Retrospective time series from a national insurance database, with members in all US states, including data from 2008 to 2021.
Methods: Insulin OOP costs and 30-day equivalent fills per year were quantified among insulin users aged 12 to 64 years, stratified by income (low- vs high-poverty zip code) and health plan type (high-deductible health plans with savings options [HDHP/SO] vs not). Participants were commercially insured insulin users aged 12 to 64 years with at least 1 full enrollment year. Characteristics of interest for disparities analysis included income level (low- vs high-poverty zip code) and health plan type (HDHP/SO vs non-HDHP/SO plan).
Results: After increases in adjusted mean annual insulin OOP costs from 2008 ($221 per non-HDHP/SO member and $313 per HDHP/SO member) to 2014 ($280 and $496, respectively), HDHP/SO members had persistent relative reductions in insulin use. In 2014, HDHP/SO members had 0.17 fewer annual fills, a disparity that increased until 2019 (0.79) before decreasing slightly by 2021 (-0.55). Lower-income members consistently had fewer insulin fills.
Conclusions: Insulin OOP cost reduction policies would be more efficient if they targeted HDHP/SO plan members and low-income patients.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.