Single-Position Lumbar Fusion Online Videos for Patient Education: Understandability, Reliability, and Quality.

IF 2.1 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Chimobi Emukah, Jerod McCarrell, Tyler K Williamson, Victor H Martinez, Yusuf Mufti, Peter G Passias
{"title":"Single-Position Lumbar Fusion Online Videos for Patient Education: Understandability, Reliability, and Quality.","authors":"Chimobi Emukah, Jerod McCarrell, Tyler K Williamson, Victor H Martinez, Yusuf Mufti, Peter G Passias","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients undergoing surgical interventions, particularly spine surgery, often rely on online videos as a first source for medical information. In this study, we sought to investigate the understandability, reliability, and quality of online patient educational videos focused on single-position lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The YouTube platform was searched using five search terms: prone transpsoas lumbar fusion, prone lateral lumbar fusion, single position lumbar fusion, prone single position lumbar fusion, and lateral single position lumbar fusion. The relevance-based ranking search option was used with each of the search terms and was investigated for videos relevant that met the inclusion criteria. Videos from academic institutions, commercial entities, individual physician, and physician groups were included for final evaluation in this study. The DISCERN instrument, patient education material assessment tool (PEMAT), the Global Quality Scale, and Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark were used to evaluate the reliability, quality, and understandability of the videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 500 videos were initially identified, and after applying inclusion criteria, 13 videos were selected for evaluation. The videos exhibited an overall average score in each category: DISCERN (41.8 ± 10), PEMAT understandability (65% ± 12%), PEMAT actionability (28% ± 15%), Global Quality Scale (2.9 ± 0.4), and Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark (2.9 ± 0.7). Notably, there was no discernible correlation between video popularity and the assigned scores. There was no correlation between video popularity and scores.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrate that patients who seek to access information about single-position lumbar fusion by using the YouTube platform will be presented with a moderate overall quality of educational content on this procedure. As single-position lumbar fusion becomes a more prevalent choice for patients, we recommend enhancing patient education on this spine surgery approach by encouraging academic institutions to produce standardized and dependable video educational materials. This would greatly benefit patients looking to better understand this procedure and make informed decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients undergoing surgical interventions, particularly spine surgery, often rely on online videos as a first source for medical information. In this study, we sought to investigate the understandability, reliability, and quality of online patient educational videos focused on single-position lumbar fusion.

Methods: The YouTube platform was searched using five search terms: prone transpsoas lumbar fusion, prone lateral lumbar fusion, single position lumbar fusion, prone single position lumbar fusion, and lateral single position lumbar fusion. The relevance-based ranking search option was used with each of the search terms and was investigated for videos relevant that met the inclusion criteria. Videos from academic institutions, commercial entities, individual physician, and physician groups were included for final evaluation in this study. The DISCERN instrument, patient education material assessment tool (PEMAT), the Global Quality Scale, and Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark were used to evaluate the reliability, quality, and understandability of the videos.

Results: A total of 500 videos were initially identified, and after applying inclusion criteria, 13 videos were selected for evaluation. The videos exhibited an overall average score in each category: DISCERN (41.8 ± 10), PEMAT understandability (65% ± 12%), PEMAT actionability (28% ± 15%), Global Quality Scale (2.9 ± 0.4), and Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark (2.9 ± 0.7). Notably, there was no discernible correlation between video popularity and the assigned scores. There was no correlation between video popularity and scores.

Discussion: The findings of this study demonstrate that patients who seek to access information about single-position lumbar fusion by using the YouTube platform will be presented with a moderate overall quality of educational content on this procedure. As single-position lumbar fusion becomes a more prevalent choice for patients, we recommend enhancing patient education on this spine surgery approach by encouraging academic institutions to produce standardized and dependable video educational materials. This would greatly benefit patients looking to better understand this procedure and make informed decisions.

用于患者教育的单体位腰椎融合在线视频:可理解性、可靠性和质量。
导读:接受外科手术,特别是脊柱手术的患者通常依赖在线视频作为医疗信息的第一来源。在这项研究中,我们试图调查关于单体位腰椎融合的在线患者教育视频的可理解性、可靠性和质量。方法:在YouTube平台上搜索俯卧位腰椎间盘融合术、俯卧位侧位腰椎融合术、单体位腰椎融合术、俯卧位单体位腰椎融合术和侧卧位单体位腰椎融合术五个关键词。对每个搜索词使用基于相关性的排名搜索选项,并对符合纳入标准的相关视频进行调查。来自学术机构、商业实体、个体医生和医生团体的视频被纳入本研究的最终评估。使用DISCERN仪器、患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)、全球质量量表和美国医学协会基准杂志来评估视频的可靠性、质量和可理解性。结果:初步确定了500个视频,应用纳入标准后,选择了13个视频进行评价。这些视频在每个类别中表现出总体平均得分:DISCERN(41.8±10),PEMAT可理解性(65%±12%),PEMAT可操作性(28%±15%),全球质量量表(2.9±0.4)和美国医学协会基准杂志(2.9±0.7)。值得注意的是,视频受欢迎程度与分配的分数之间没有明显的相关性。视频受欢迎程度和分数之间没有相关性。讨论:本研究结果表明,通过YouTube平台获取单体位腰椎融合术信息的患者将获得有关该手术的中等质量的教育内容。随着单体位腰椎融合术成为患者更普遍的选择,我们建议通过鼓励学术机构制作标准化和可靠的视频教材来加强患者对这种脊柱手术方法的教育。这将极大地有利于患者更好地了解这一过程,并作出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信