Elranatamab Fixed Dosing: A Safe, Effective, and Convenient Dosing Approach.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Targeted Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s11523-025-01170-4
Mohamed Elmeliegy, Pooneh Soltantabar, Jennifer Hibma, Olivia Ashman, Diane Wang, Hoi-Kei Lon
{"title":"Elranatamab Fixed Dosing: A Safe, Effective, and Convenient Dosing Approach.","authors":"Mohamed Elmeliegy, Pooneh Soltantabar, Jennifer Hibma, Olivia Ashman, Diane Wang, Hoi-Kei Lon","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01170-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) are a promising modality for cancer treatment, and evaluation of dosing strategies, including utilization of body weight-based versus fixed dosing, is essential to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes. Elranatamab is a bispecific TCE that targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on multiple myeloma cells and CD on T cells. Elranatamab is approved for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the impact of body weight on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of elranatamab.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from the phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial (NCT04649359) were used to evaluate the impact of body weight on the PK, safety, and efficacy of elranatamab. This trial comprised two cohorts: cohort A included patients who had not previously received BCMA-directed therapy and cohort B included patients who had received prior BCMA-directed therapies. All patients received a 76-mg fixed dose of subcutaneous elranatamab once weekly after a two-step priming dose regimen. Blood samples were collected from MagnetisMM-3 trial patients for PK analysis. This study analyzed the PK, efficacy, and safety of elranatamab across body weight quartiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated that when elranatamab was given at a fixed dose, the predose concentrations showed overlapping distributions with comparable medians, especially across the lowest three body weight quartiles, with a lower median for quartile 4, which was not considered clinically relevant. There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety profile between different body weight quartiles. With respect to efficacy, the overall response and complete response rates were comparable across body weight quartiles. A clinically meaningful objective response rate benefit with overlapping confidence intervals was observed across all four quartiles, consistent with the primary efficacy analysis. No trend was identified between body weight and progression-free survival and the duration of response on the basis of the Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concerns with flat dosing include the potential for overdosing those with lower body weights and underdosing individuals with higher body weights. However, this study provides evidence that fixed dosing of elranatamab is effective and demonstrated a consistent and manageable safety profile across a broad range of body weights. There is no significant impact of body weight on the PK, safety, or efficacy of elranatamab. These findings support the approved fixed dosing of elranatamab in patients with RRMM.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong></p><p><strong>Gov identifier: </strong>NCT04649359.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"821-831"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01170-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) are a promising modality for cancer treatment, and evaluation of dosing strategies, including utilization of body weight-based versus fixed dosing, is essential to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes. Elranatamab is a bispecific TCE that targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on multiple myeloma cells and CD on T cells. Elranatamab is approved for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Objective: Evaluate the impact of body weight on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of elranatamab.

Patients and methods: Data from the phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial (NCT04649359) were used to evaluate the impact of body weight on the PK, safety, and efficacy of elranatamab. This trial comprised two cohorts: cohort A included patients who had not previously received BCMA-directed therapy and cohort B included patients who had received prior BCMA-directed therapies. All patients received a 76-mg fixed dose of subcutaneous elranatamab once weekly after a two-step priming dose regimen. Blood samples were collected from MagnetisMM-3 trial patients for PK analysis. This study analyzed the PK, efficacy, and safety of elranatamab across body weight quartiles.

Results: The results demonstrated that when elranatamab was given at a fixed dose, the predose concentrations showed overlapping distributions with comparable medians, especially across the lowest three body weight quartiles, with a lower median for quartile 4, which was not considered clinically relevant. There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety profile between different body weight quartiles. With respect to efficacy, the overall response and complete response rates were comparable across body weight quartiles. A clinically meaningful objective response rate benefit with overlapping confidence intervals was observed across all four quartiles, consistent with the primary efficacy analysis. No trend was identified between body weight and progression-free survival and the duration of response on the basis of the Kaplan-Meier curves.

Conclusions: Concerns with flat dosing include the potential for overdosing those with lower body weights and underdosing individuals with higher body weights. However, this study provides evidence that fixed dosing of elranatamab is effective and demonstrated a consistent and manageable safety profile across a broad range of body weights. There is no significant impact of body weight on the PK, safety, or efficacy of elranatamab. These findings support the approved fixed dosing of elranatamab in patients with RRMM.

Clinicaltrials:

Gov identifier: NCT04649359.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

埃尔那他单抗固定给药:一种安全、有效和方便的给药方法。
背景:双特异性t细胞参与剂(tce)是一种很有前景的癌症治疗方式,对剂量策略进行评估,包括基于体重的剂量与固定剂量的使用,对于确保最佳治疗效果至关重要。Elranatamab是一种双特异性TCE,靶向多发性骨髓瘤细胞上的b细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)和T细胞上的CD。Elranatamab被批准用于复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)。目的:评价体重对elranatumab药代动力学(PK)、安全性和有效性的影响。患者和方法:使用来自2期MagnetisMM-3试验(NCT04649359)的数据来评估体重对elranatamab的PK、安全性和有效性的影响。该试验包括两个队列:队列A包括先前未接受bcma定向治疗的患者,队列B包括先前接受bcma定向治疗的患者。在两步启动给药方案后,所有患者每周接受一次76毫克固定剂量的皮下elranatamab。对MagnetisMM-3试验患者采集血样进行PK分析。本研究分析了elranatamab在体重四分位数上的PK、疗效和安全性。结果:结果表明,当以固定剂量给予埃尔那他单抗时,剂量前浓度呈现重叠分布,具有可比较的中位数,特别是在最低的三个体重四分位数中,四分位数4的中位数较低,这被认为与临床无关。不同体重四分位数之间的安全性无临床相关差异。就疗效而言,总体缓解率和完全缓解率在体重四分位数之间具有可比性。在所有四个四分位数中观察到具有重叠置信区间的临床有意义的客观缓解率获益,与主要疗效分析一致。在Kaplan-Meier曲线的基础上,体重与无进展生存期和反应持续时间之间没有确定趋势。结论:对平剂量的关注包括体重较轻的人可能过量和体重较高的人可能剂量不足。然而,本研究提供的证据表明,固定剂量的elranatamab是有效的,并且在广泛的体重范围内显示出一致和可管理的安全性。体重对elranatamab的PK、安全性或有效性没有显著影响。这些发现支持在RRMM患者中批准固定剂量的elranatamab。临床试验:政府标识符:NCT04649359。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信