Emergency Care Interventions for Victims of Explosive Ordnance Reduce Mortality: A Modeling Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1017/S1049023X25101283
Hannah B H Wild, Benjamin Q Huynh, Sebastian Kasack, Alex Munyambabazi, Yves Sanou, Yves Nacanabo, Moumini Niaone, Aparna Cheran, Emilie Calvello Hynes, Nicolas Meda, Adam Kushner, Barclay T Stewart
{"title":"Emergency Care Interventions for Victims of Explosive Ordnance Reduce Mortality: A Modeling Study.","authors":"Hannah B H Wild, Benjamin Q Huynh, Sebastian Kasack, Alex Munyambabazi, Yves Sanou, Yves Nacanabo, Moumini Niaone, Aparna Cheran, Emilie Calvello Hynes, Nicolas Meda, Adam Kushner, Barclay T Stewart","doi":"10.1017/S1049023X25101283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern conflicts are characterized by wide-spread use of conventional explosive ordnance (EO), improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and other air-launched explosives. In contrast to advances in military medicine and high-income civilian trauma systems since the United States-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the mortality rate among civilian EO casualties has not decreased in decades. Although humanitarian mine action (HMA) stakeholders have extensive presence and medical capabilities in EO-affected settings, coordination between HMA and health actors has not been leveraged systematically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a prior systematic review of emergency care interventions feasible within the context of HMA activities and low-resource health care systems were used to model mortality reduction among EO victims. Interventions were categorized using the World Health Organization (WHO) Emergency Care System Framework sites of \"scene,\" \"transport,\" and \"facility.\" The cumulative impact of the interventions on EO-related mortality was estimated using pooled effect estimates and simulation modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 16 reports from 13 countries, representing 127,505 injured persons. Pooled effect estimates across subcategories of emergency care interventions were 0.42 for layperson transportation (95%CI, 0.24-0.74), 0.79 for prehospital notification systems (95%CI, 0.51-1.19), 0.52 for prehospital trauma care training courses (95%CI, 0.46-0.59), 0.67 for facility-based trauma care training courses (95%CI, 0.48-0.92), and 0.66 for facility-based trauma team organization and activation protocols (95%CI, 0.45-0.97). A 68% reduction in mortality (95%UI, 57%-79%) was observed when implementing the full set of interventions in a region with no prior implemented interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enhanced coordination between HMA and health actors to implement a structured set of emergency care interventions holds potential to significantly reduce preventable death among civilian EO casualties.</p>","PeriodicalId":20400,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"204-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X25101283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Modern conflicts are characterized by wide-spread use of conventional explosive ordnance (EO), improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and other air-launched explosives. In contrast to advances in military medicine and high-income civilian trauma systems since the United States-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the mortality rate among civilian EO casualties has not decreased in decades. Although humanitarian mine action (HMA) stakeholders have extensive presence and medical capabilities in EO-affected settings, coordination between HMA and health actors has not been leveraged systematically.

Methods: Data from a prior systematic review of emergency care interventions feasible within the context of HMA activities and low-resource health care systems were used to model mortality reduction among EO victims. Interventions were categorized using the World Health Organization (WHO) Emergency Care System Framework sites of "scene," "transport," and "facility." The cumulative impact of the interventions on EO-related mortality was estimated using pooled effect estimates and simulation modeling.

Results: The meta-analysis included 16 reports from 13 countries, representing 127,505 injured persons. Pooled effect estimates across subcategories of emergency care interventions were 0.42 for layperson transportation (95%CI, 0.24-0.74), 0.79 for prehospital notification systems (95%CI, 0.51-1.19), 0.52 for prehospital trauma care training courses (95%CI, 0.46-0.59), 0.67 for facility-based trauma care training courses (95%CI, 0.48-0.92), and 0.66 for facility-based trauma team organization and activation protocols (95%CI, 0.45-0.97). A 68% reduction in mortality (95%UI, 57%-79%) was observed when implementing the full set of interventions in a region with no prior implemented interventions.

Conclusion: Enhanced coordination between HMA and health actors to implement a structured set of emergency care interventions holds potential to significantly reduce preventable death among civilian EO casualties.

爆炸性弹药受害者的紧急护理干预措施降低死亡率:一项模型研究。
背景:现代冲突的特点是广泛使用常规爆炸弹药(EO)、简易爆炸装置(ied)和其他空射炸药。与美国领导的阿富汗和伊拉克战争以来军事医学和高收入平民创伤系统的进步形成鲜明对比的是,几十年来,平民EO伤亡的死亡率并没有下降。尽管人道主义地雷行动利益攸关方在受eo影响的环境中广泛存在并具有医疗能力,但人道主义地雷行动与卫生行为体之间的协调尚未得到系统的利用。方法:在HMA活动和低资源卫生保健系统的背景下,对急诊护理干预措施的可行性进行了系统回顾,并利用这些数据对EO受害者的死亡率降低进行了建模。干预措施使用世界卫生组织(WHO)紧急护理系统框架站点按“现场”、“运输”和“设施”进行分类。使用合并效应估计和模拟建模来估计干预措施对eo相关死亡率的累积影响。结果:荟萃分析包括来自13个国家的16份报告,代表127,505名伤者。急诊护理干预子类别的综合效应估计为:外行人运输0.42 (95%CI, 0.24-0.74),院前通知系统0.79 (95%CI, 0.51-1.19),院前创伤护理培训课程0.52 (95%CI, 0.46-0.59),医院创伤护理培训课程0.67 (95%CI, 0.48-0.92),医院创伤团队组织和激活方案0.66 (95%CI, 0.45-0.97)。在先前未实施干预措施的区域实施全套干预措施后,死亡率降低68% (95%UI, 57%-79%)。结论:加强卫生管理局和卫生行为体之间的协调,以实施一套结构化的紧急护理干预措施,有可能显著减少EO平民伤亡中可预防的死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (PDM) is an official publication of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine. Currently in its 25th volume, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine is one of the leading scientific journals focusing on prehospital and disaster health. It is the only peer-reviewed international journal in its field, published bi-monthly, providing a readable, usable worldwide source of research and analysis. PDM is currently distributed in more than 55 countries. Its readership includes physicians, professors, EMTs and paramedics, nurses, emergency managers, disaster planners, hospital administrators, sociologists, and psychologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信