Cardiovascular safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advance breast cancer: Assessing risks of QTc prolongation and thrombosis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Alaa Shahbar
{"title":"Cardiovascular safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advance breast cancer: Assessing risks of QTc prolongation and thrombosis.","authors":"Alaa Shahbar","doi":"10.1177/10781552251368239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveCyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have become a cornerstone in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, demonstrating significant efficacy in both early and metastatic stages. However, despite their clinical benefits, emerging evidence from health databases, real-world studies, and case reports highlight potential cardiovascular risks, including QTc prolongation and thrombosis. This review aims to comprehensively evaluate the cardiovascular safety profiles of the three FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors-palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib-in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Specifically, it compares the risks of QTc prolongation and thrombosis associated with these agents.Data sourceA literature search was conducted using PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and manual searches of relevant articles.Study selectionStudies included in this review were those that reported CDK4/6 inhibitor cardiovascular outcomes, specifically QTc prolongation and thrombosis, in patients with advanced breast cancer.ConclusionThe review highlights significant differences in the cardiovascular safety profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Ribociclib is associated with the highest risk of QTc prolongation, with incidence rates ranging from 4.5% to 13.3% in RCTs, while palbociclib demonstrates a more favorable profile, with QTc prolongation reported in less than 1% of cases. Abemaciclib, although not linked to QTc prolongation, has the highest reported incidence of thrombosis, ranging from 2.0% to 4.9% in RCTs. Real-world data revealed thrombosis incidence rates as high as 17% among patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Thus, future research must ascertain the cardiovascular safety profiles of different CDK4/6 inhibitors and develop effective cardiovascular toxicity prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251368239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251368239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveCyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have become a cornerstone in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, demonstrating significant efficacy in both early and metastatic stages. However, despite their clinical benefits, emerging evidence from health databases, real-world studies, and case reports highlight potential cardiovascular risks, including QTc prolongation and thrombosis. This review aims to comprehensively evaluate the cardiovascular safety profiles of the three FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors-palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib-in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Specifically, it compares the risks of QTc prolongation and thrombosis associated with these agents.Data sourceA literature search was conducted using PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and manual searches of relevant articles.Study selectionStudies included in this review were those that reported CDK4/6 inhibitor cardiovascular outcomes, specifically QTc prolongation and thrombosis, in patients with advanced breast cancer.ConclusionThe review highlights significant differences in the cardiovascular safety profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Ribociclib is associated with the highest risk of QTc prolongation, with incidence rates ranging from 4.5% to 13.3% in RCTs, while palbociclib demonstrates a more favorable profile, with QTc prolongation reported in less than 1% of cases. Abemaciclib, although not linked to QTc prolongation, has the highest reported incidence of thrombosis, ranging from 2.0% to 4.9% in RCTs. Real-world data revealed thrombosis incidence rates as high as 17% among patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Thus, future research must ascertain the cardiovascular safety profiles of different CDK4/6 inhibitors and develop effective cardiovascular toxicity prevention strategies.

CDK4/6抑制剂在乳腺癌晚期的心血管安全性:评估QTc延长和血栓形成的风险
周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK) 4/6抑制剂已成为激素受体阳性(HR+)和人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)乳腺癌治疗的基石,在早期和转移期均显示出显著的疗效。然而,尽管它们具有临床益处,但来自健康数据库、现实世界研究和病例报告的新证据强调了潜在的心血管风险,包括QTc延长和血栓形成。本综述旨在全面评估fda批准的三种CDK4/6抑制剂palbociclib、ribociclib和abemaciclib在HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌患者中的心血管安全性。具体来说,它比较了与这些药物相关的QTc延长和血栓形成的风险。使用PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov进行文献检索,并手动检索相关文章。研究选择本综述纳入的研究报告了CDK4/6抑制剂在晚期乳腺癌患者中的心血管结局,特别是QTc延长和血栓形成。结论本综述强调了CDK4/6抑制剂在心血管安全性方面的显著差异。Ribociclib与QTc延长的最高风险相关,在随机对照试验中其发生率从4.5%到13.3%不等,而palbociclib表现出更有利的情况,据报道QTc延长的病例不到1%。Abemaciclib虽然与QTc延长无关,但据报道其血栓发生率最高,在随机对照试验中为2.0%至4.9%。实际数据显示,在接受CDK4/6抑制剂治疗的患者中,血栓发生率高达17%。因此,未来的研究必须确定不同CDK4/6抑制剂的心血管安全性,并制定有效的心血管毒性预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信