Facing antimicrobial resistance in cancer care: what the AIOM survey tells us about oncologists' awareness.

IF 3.3 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-08-18 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf150
A Lasagna, P Cambieri, S Figini, F Baldanti, M Andreoni, F Perrone, N Silvestris, P Pedrazzoli
{"title":"Facing antimicrobial resistance in cancer care: what the AIOM survey tells us about oncologists' awareness.","authors":"A Lasagna, P Cambieri, S Figini, F Baldanti, M Andreoni, F Perrone, N Silvestris, P Pedrazzoli","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infections with antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) organisms significantly worsen outcomes in cancer patients. Since the main cause of AMR is the inappropriate use of antibiotics for prophylactic or empirical treatment, antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) have been developed. Few papers on ASPs describe prospective audits in oncology settings. In light of this, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) has decided to evaluate the oncologists' perceptions of this issue with a brief survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous 14-item questionnaire was shared online during the XXVI National Congress on the AIOM website. The survey was divided into two sections. The first set of questions collected the hospital organization and practices (Q1-Q6), while the second one was about the clinical practices and antibiotic therapy (Q7-Q14).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four medical oncologists completed the anonymous questionnaire. Seventy-two percent of respondents believe that AMR is a significant issue in cancer patients, and an equal percentage considers it likely that a cancer patient will become infected with a MDR pathogen. Despite these concerns, only 48% (<i>n</i> = 31/64) report having an active ASP in their centre. Just 6% of respondents (<i>n</i> = 4/64) consider themselves very confident in prescribing antibiotic therapy, while most consider themselves fairly or not very confident (<i>n</i> = 34/64, 53%, and <i>n</i> = 26/64, 36%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights the urgent need for educating and training oncologists on AMR, as well as the importance of the development of oncology-specific guidelines to mitigate the impact of AMR in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 4","pages":"dlaf150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infections with antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) organisms significantly worsen outcomes in cancer patients. Since the main cause of AMR is the inappropriate use of antibiotics for prophylactic or empirical treatment, antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) have been developed. Few papers on ASPs describe prospective audits in oncology settings. In light of this, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) has decided to evaluate the oncologists' perceptions of this issue with a brief survey.

Methods: An anonymous 14-item questionnaire was shared online during the XXVI National Congress on the AIOM website. The survey was divided into two sections. The first set of questions collected the hospital organization and practices (Q1-Q6), while the second one was about the clinical practices and antibiotic therapy (Q7-Q14).

Results: Sixty-four medical oncologists completed the anonymous questionnaire. Seventy-two percent of respondents believe that AMR is a significant issue in cancer patients, and an equal percentage considers it likely that a cancer patient will become infected with a MDR pathogen. Despite these concerns, only 48% (n = 31/64) report having an active ASP in their centre. Just 6% of respondents (n = 4/64) consider themselves very confident in prescribing antibiotic therapy, while most consider themselves fairly or not very confident (n = 34/64, 53%, and n = 26/64, 36%, respectively).

Conclusions: This survey highlights the urgent need for educating and training oncologists on AMR, as well as the importance of the development of oncology-specific guidelines to mitigate the impact of AMR in this high-risk population.

面对抗菌素耐药性在癌症治疗:什么AIOM调查告诉我们关于肿瘤学家的意识。
背景:抗菌素耐药(AMR)微生物感染显著恶化癌症患者的预后。由于抗菌素耐药性的主要原因是在预防性或经验性治疗中不当使用抗生素,因此制定了抗菌素管理规划(asp)。很少有关于asp的论文描述肿瘤学环境中的前瞻性审计。鉴于此,意大利肿瘤医学协会(AIOM)决定通过一项简短的调查来评估肿瘤学家对这一问题的看法。方法:在第二十六届全国代表大会期间,在AIOM网站上共享一份14项匿名问卷。调查分为两个部分。第一组问题收集了医院的组织和实践(Q1-Q6),第二组问题是关于临床实践和抗生素治疗(Q7-Q14)。结果:64名内科肿瘤学家完成了匿名问卷。72%的答复者认为抗菌素耐药性对癌症患者来说是一个重大问题,同样比例的答复者认为癌症患者可能会感染耐多药病原体。尽管存在这些担忧,但只有48% (n = 31/64)报告其中心有活跃的ASP。只有6%的答复者(n = 4/64)认为自己对开抗生素治疗非常有信心,而大多数人认为自己相当有信心或不太有信心(n = 34/ 64,53 %, n = 26/ 64,36 %)。结论:该调查强调了对肿瘤学家进行AMR教育和培训的迫切需要,以及制定肿瘤特异性指南以减轻AMR在这一高危人群中的影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信