Short- to Mid-Term Efficacy and Safety of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Guided by Continuous Uninterrupted Paced Intracardiac Electrogram Monitoring Targeting Transition to Selective Left Bundle Branch Capture.
{"title":"Short- to Mid-Term Efficacy and Safety of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Guided by Continuous Uninterrupted Paced Intracardiac Electrogram Monitoring Targeting Transition to Selective Left Bundle Branch Capture.","authors":"Hao Wu, Longfu Jiang, Weilin Chen, Shanshan Zhuo, Jiabo Shen, Lu Zhang, Yuelin Zhang, Xinhui Peng","doi":"10.1111/jce.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uninterrupted left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) lead implantation with the endpoint of transition to selected (S)-left bundle (LB) capture is feasible and safe during the procedure; however, the relatively long-term outcomes remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the short- to mid-term performance and safety of uninterrupted LBBP lead implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent successful LBBP and achieved the implantation endpoint, guided by continuous paced intracardiac electrogram monitoring, were enrolled. Electrocardiograms, pacing parameters, echocardiographic measurements, and complications associated with LBBP were assessed during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up duration was 14.2 ± 8.8 months. Pacing parameters, including R-wave amplitude, pacing threshold, and impedance, remained stable throughout the follow-up period for both unipolar and bipolar configurations. The transition from nonselected (NS)-LB to S-LB was observed at various unipolar pacing outputs during follow-up, along with double transitions in bipolar pacing. The proportion of patients transitioning to NS-LB, S-LB, and left ventricular septum (LVS) under unipolar pacing at 8 V, 3 V, 2 V, and 1 V remained stable during follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction (62.7 ± 7.0% vs 62.1 ± 11.9%, p = 0.723) remained stable during follow-up compared to baseline. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (47.5 ± 5.6 mm vs. 51.1 ± 7.1 mm, p = 0.001) decreased significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uninterrupted LBBP lead implantation with the endpoint of transition to S-LB, was safe and feasible in short- to mid-term observations. It can improve LVEF in patients with HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Uninterrupted left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) lead implantation with the endpoint of transition to selected (S)-left bundle (LB) capture is feasible and safe during the procedure; however, the relatively long-term outcomes remain unknown.
Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the short- to mid-term performance and safety of uninterrupted LBBP lead implantation.
Methods: Patients who underwent successful LBBP and achieved the implantation endpoint, guided by continuous paced intracardiac electrogram monitoring, were enrolled. Electrocardiograms, pacing parameters, echocardiographic measurements, and complications associated with LBBP were assessed during follow-up.
Results: A total of 83 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up duration was 14.2 ± 8.8 months. Pacing parameters, including R-wave amplitude, pacing threshold, and impedance, remained stable throughout the follow-up period for both unipolar and bipolar configurations. The transition from nonselected (NS)-LB to S-LB was observed at various unipolar pacing outputs during follow-up, along with double transitions in bipolar pacing. The proportion of patients transitioning to NS-LB, S-LB, and left ventricular septum (LVS) under unipolar pacing at 8 V, 3 V, 2 V, and 1 V remained stable during follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction (62.7 ± 7.0% vs 62.1 ± 11.9%, p = 0.723) remained stable during follow-up compared to baseline. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (47.5 ± 5.6 mm vs. 51.1 ± 7.1 mm, p = 0.001) decreased significantly.
Conclusions: Uninterrupted LBBP lead implantation with the endpoint of transition to S-LB, was safe and feasible in short- to mid-term observations. It can improve LVEF in patients with HFrEF.
背景:不间断左束分支起搏(LBBP)导联植入,终点过渡到选择(S)-左束(LB)捕获在手术过程中是可行和安全的;然而,相对长期的结果仍然未知。目的:评价不间断LBBP导联植入的中短期性能和安全性。方法:在连续心律失常心电图监测指导下,成功完成LBBP并达到植入终点的患者入组。随访期间评估心电图、起搏参数、超声心动图测量和与LBBP相关的并发症。结果:共有83例患者入组。平均随访14.2±8.8个月。起搏参数,包括r波振幅、起搏阈值和阻抗,在单极和双极配置的整个随访期间保持稳定。在随访期间,在各种单极起搏输出中观察到从非选择(NS)-LB到S-LB的转变,以及双极起搏的双重转变。随访期间,在8v、3v、2v、1v单极起搏下过渡到NS-LB、S-LB和左室间隔(LVS)的患者比例保持稳定。左心室射血分数(62.7±7.0% vs 62.1±11.9%,p = 0.723)在随访期间与基线相比保持稳定。左室舒张末期尺寸(47.5±5.6 mm vs 51.1±7.1 mm, p = 0.001)明显减小。结论:在中短期观察中,以过渡到S-LB为终点的不间断LBBP导联植入是安全可行的。它可以改善HFrEF患者的LVEF。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.