Marco Foreman, Isabella Amador, Arman Tabarestani, Kevin A Hao, Jonathan Benjamin, Jed Casauay, Oluwaferanmi Dada, Persis Desai, Aaron Jennings, Adrienne Orriols, Reed Popp, Supreeya A Saengchote, Anton Khlopas, Keegan Hones, Richard Hutchison, Jongmin Kim, Thomas W Wright, Morad Chughtai
{"title":"Wound Irrigation Prior to Closure During Routine Upper-Extremity Surgery: Is There a Difference in Wound Complications?","authors":"Marco Foreman, Isabella Amador, Arman Tabarestani, Kevin A Hao, Jonathan Benjamin, Jed Casauay, Oluwaferanmi Dada, Persis Desai, Aaron Jennings, Adrienne Orriols, Reed Popp, Supreeya A Saengchote, Anton Khlopas, Keegan Hones, Richard Hutchison, Jongmin Kim, Thomas W Wright, Morad Chughtai","doi":"10.1177/15589447251357042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Presently, there is no consensus within the field of orthopedics on whether irrigation prior to wound closure in routine upper-extremity surgery reduces wound complications. Therefore, preclosure wound irrigation could provide time and cost savings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of wound irrigation in routine upper-extremity procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing routine upper-extremity surgery at a single institution from 2013 to 2022. Patients were included if they underwent soft tissue upper extremity surgery. Patients were excluded for having concomitant lacerations, penetrating injuries, open fractures, or unknown irrigation technique. Our primary outcome was comparison of the rate of wound complications based on whether irrigation was used. Multivariable logistic regression was additionally used to determine whether irrigation prior to closure was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative wound complications independent of potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1425 patients. The mean age was 55.2 ± 16 years and 65% were female. The incision was irrigated prior to closure in 65% of surgeries. Wound complications occurred in 2.9% of patients (n = 41). On bivariable analysis, irrigation prior to closure was not associated with a decreased incidence of wound complications (3.5% vs 1.8%, <i>P</i> = .070). When adjusting for age, sex, BMI, operative time, history of prior surgery, diabetes, tobacco use, corticosteroid use, and immunosuppressant use, the employment of irrigation prior to wound closure was not associated with lower odds of wound complications in either bivariable (OR: 1.99, 95% CI 0.94-4.19, <i>P</i> = .07) or multivariable (OR: 1.88, 95% CI 0.88-4.04, <i>P</i> = .08) analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of irrigation prior to wound closure was not associated with a difference in the odds of postoperative wound complications. Surgeons should consider forgoing irrigation prior to closure to increase operating room efficiency and provide cost savings to the patients and payers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447251357042"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251357042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Presently, there is no consensus within the field of orthopedics on whether irrigation prior to wound closure in routine upper-extremity surgery reduces wound complications. Therefore, preclosure wound irrigation could provide time and cost savings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of wound irrigation in routine upper-extremity procedures.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing routine upper-extremity surgery at a single institution from 2013 to 2022. Patients were included if they underwent soft tissue upper extremity surgery. Patients were excluded for having concomitant lacerations, penetrating injuries, open fractures, or unknown irrigation technique. Our primary outcome was comparison of the rate of wound complications based on whether irrigation was used. Multivariable logistic regression was additionally used to determine whether irrigation prior to closure was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative wound complications independent of potential confounders.
Results: We included 1425 patients. The mean age was 55.2 ± 16 years and 65% were female. The incision was irrigated prior to closure in 65% of surgeries. Wound complications occurred in 2.9% of patients (n = 41). On bivariable analysis, irrigation prior to closure was not associated with a decreased incidence of wound complications (3.5% vs 1.8%, P = .070). When adjusting for age, sex, BMI, operative time, history of prior surgery, diabetes, tobacco use, corticosteroid use, and immunosuppressant use, the employment of irrigation prior to wound closure was not associated with lower odds of wound complications in either bivariable (OR: 1.99, 95% CI 0.94-4.19, P = .07) or multivariable (OR: 1.88, 95% CI 0.88-4.04, P = .08) analysis.
Conclusion: Use of irrigation prior to wound closure was not associated with a difference in the odds of postoperative wound complications. Surgeons should consider forgoing irrigation prior to closure to increase operating room efficiency and provide cost savings to the patients and payers.
背景:目前,骨科领域对常规上肢手术伤口闭合前冲洗是否能减少伤口并发症尚无共识。因此,预封伤口冲洗可节省时间和成本。本研究的目的是评估伤口冲洗在常规上肢手术中的有效性。方法:我们对2013年至2022年在单一机构接受常规上肢手术的成年患者进行回顾性分析。如果患者接受了上肢软组织手术,则纳入其中。排除伴有撕裂伤、穿透性损伤、开放性骨折或未知冲洗技术的患者。我们的主要结局是根据是否使用冲洗来比较伤口并发症的发生率。此外,多变量逻辑回归用于确定闭合前冲洗是否与较低的术后伤口并发症发生率相关,独立于潜在的混杂因素。结果:纳入1425例患者。平均年龄55.2±16岁,女性占65%。65%的手术在缝合前冲洗切口。伤口并发症发生率为2.9% (n = 41)。在双变量分析中,缝合前冲洗与伤口并发症发生率的降低无关(3.5% vs 1.8%, P = 0.070)。在调整年龄、性别、BMI、手术时间、既往手术史、糖尿病、吸烟、皮质类固醇使用和免疫抑制剂使用等因素后,在双变量分析(OR: 1.99, 95% CI 0.94-4.19, P = 0.07)或多变量分析(OR: 1.88, 95% CI 0.88-4.04, P = 0.08)中,伤口闭合前冲洗与伤口并发症发生率降低无关。结论:伤口关闭前使用冲洗与术后伤口并发症的发生率无关。外科医生应考虑在关闭前放弃冲洗,以提高手术室效率,并为患者和付款人节省成本。
期刊介绍:
HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.