Safety of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate delivered by HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a phase 3, multi-site, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-comparator study.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103402
Omar S Usmani, Fernando J Martinez, Hitesh Pandya, Matthew Camiolo, Artur Bednarczyk, Kinga Kucz, Marek Kokot, Christer Gottfridsson, Magnus Aurivillius, Lars Pettersson, Jie Mei, Karin Skansen, Jennifer L Bell, David Petullo, Kathryn Collison, Patrik Bondarov, Mandeep Jassal, Mehul Patel
{"title":"Safety of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate delivered by HFO-1234ze versus HFA-134a in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a phase 3, multi-site, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-comparator study.","authors":"Omar S Usmani, Fernando J Martinez, Hitesh Pandya, Matthew Camiolo, Artur Bednarczyk, Kinga Kucz, Marek Kokot, Christer Gottfridsson, Magnus Aurivillius, Lars Pettersson, Jie Mei, Karin Skansen, Jennifer L Bell, David Petullo, Kathryn Collison, Patrik Bondarov, Mandeep Jassal, Mehul Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) contain a hydrofluorocarbon propellant, such as hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-134a), which is known to have global warming potential (GWP). Transitioning pMDIs to propellants with lower GWP will reduce the environmental impact of pMDIs. This study assessed the safety of a near-zero GWP propellant, hydrofluoroolefin-1234ze (HFO-1234ze), compared with HFA-134a when used in the delivery of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) in participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The results of this study advance our understanding of the safety of HFO-1234ze compared with HFA-134a.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3, double-blind, parallel-group study (ClinicalTrials.govNCT05573464) across 9 countries (Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States) included participants (aged 40-80 years) with physician-diagnosed COPD using dual or triple inhaled maintenance therapies, COPD Assessment Test score ≥10, ≥10 pack-years smoking history, and no comorbid diagnosis of asthma or other clinically significant diseases impacting study outcomes. Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive either BGF HFO-1234ze or BGF HFA-134a (two inhalations of 160/7·2/5·0 μg twice daily) for 12 weeks in the main safety analysis set (or 52 weeks [first 120 participants per treatment]). Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), measures of vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants were recruited between 27 September 2022 and 19 May 2023. A total of 874 participants were screened. Of 558 treated participants (mean [standard deviation] age, 67·0 [7·4] years; male, 315 [56·5%]) in the 12-week safety analysis set, 280 received BGF HFO-1234ze, and 278 received BGF HFA-134a. The AE incidence was balanced between formulations in the 12-week (HFO-1234ze, 124 [44·3%]; HFA-134a, 114 [41·0%]) and 52-week (HFO-1234ze, 80 [66·7%]; HFA-134a, 94 [78·3%]) safety analysis sets.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>These findings support the potential for HFO-1234ze to replace HFA-134a in pMDIs containing BGF, which could be evaluated further in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The study was supported by AstraZeneca.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"87 ","pages":"103402"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) contain a hydrofluorocarbon propellant, such as hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-134a), which is known to have global warming potential (GWP). Transitioning pMDIs to propellants with lower GWP will reduce the environmental impact of pMDIs. This study assessed the safety of a near-zero GWP propellant, hydrofluoroolefin-1234ze (HFO-1234ze), compared with HFA-134a when used in the delivery of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) in participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The results of this study advance our understanding of the safety of HFO-1234ze compared with HFA-134a.

Methods: This phase 3, double-blind, parallel-group study (ClinicalTrials.govNCT05573464) across 9 countries (Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States) included participants (aged 40-80 years) with physician-diagnosed COPD using dual or triple inhaled maintenance therapies, COPD Assessment Test score ≥10, ≥10 pack-years smoking history, and no comorbid diagnosis of asthma or other clinically significant diseases impacting study outcomes. Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive either BGF HFO-1234ze or BGF HFA-134a (two inhalations of 160/7·2/5·0 μg twice daily) for 12 weeks in the main safety analysis set (or 52 weeks [first 120 participants per treatment]). Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), measures of vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms.

Findings: Participants were recruited between 27 September 2022 and 19 May 2023. A total of 874 participants were screened. Of 558 treated participants (mean [standard deviation] age, 67·0 [7·4] years; male, 315 [56·5%]) in the 12-week safety analysis set, 280 received BGF HFO-1234ze, and 278 received BGF HFA-134a. The AE incidence was balanced between formulations in the 12-week (HFO-1234ze, 124 [44·3%]; HFA-134a, 114 [41·0%]) and 52-week (HFO-1234ze, 80 [66·7%]; HFA-134a, 94 [78·3%]) safety analysis sets.

Interpretation: These findings support the potential for HFO-1234ze to replace HFA-134a in pMDIs containing BGF, which could be evaluated further in a real-world setting.

Funding: The study was supported by AstraZeneca.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

HFO-1234ze与HFA-134a递送布地奈德/甘炔溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗二水合物治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的安全性:一项3期、多地点、随机、双盲、平行组、活性比较研究
背景:加压计量吸入器(pmdi)含有氢氟碳推进剂,如氢氟烷烃-134a (HFA-134a),已知其具有全球变暖潜能值(GWP)。将pmdi转换为具有较低GWP的推进剂将减少pmdi对环境的影响。本研究评估了近零GWP推进剂氢氟烯烃-1234ze (HFO-1234ze)与HFA-134a在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中用于递送布地奈德/甘炔溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗二水合物(BGF)的安全性。本研究结果进一步加深了我们对HFO-1234ze与HFA-134a的安全性的认识。方法:这项3期、双盲、平行组研究(ClinicalTrials.govNCT05573464)横跨9个国家(阿根廷、保加利亚、加拿大、德国、墨西哥、波兰、土耳其、英国和美国),纳入了年龄在40-80岁、经医生诊断为COPD、使用双或三次吸入维持治疗、COPD评估测试评分≥10分、吸烟史≥10包年、无哮喘或其他影响研究结果的临床显著性疾病合并症的参与者。在主要安全性分析集中,参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受BGF HFO-1234ze或BGF HFA-134a(两次吸入160/7·2/5·0 μg,每日两次),持续12周(或52周[每次治疗前120名参与者])。安全性终点包括不良事件发生率(ae)、生命体征测量、临床实验室检查和心电图。研究结果:参与者在2022年9月27日至2023年5月19日期间被招募。总共筛选了874名参与者。在为期12周的安全性分析集中,558名接受治疗的参与者(平均[标准差]年龄为67.0[7.4]岁,男性315[56.5%])中,280人接受BGF HFO-1234ze治疗,278人接受BGF HFA-134a治疗。在12周(HFO-1234ze, 124 [44.3%]; HFA-134a, 114[41.0%])和52周(HFO-1234ze, 80 [66.7%]; HFA-134a, 94[78.3%])的安全性分析组中,AE的发生率基本平衡。解释:这些发现支持HFO-1234ze在含有BGF的pmdi中取代HFA-134a的潜力,可以在现实环境中进一步评估。资助:该研究由阿斯利康公司支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信