Safety and effectiveness of the early-onset sepsis calculator to reduce antibiotic exposure in at-risk newborns: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103419
Bo M van der Weijden, Sanne W C M Janssen, Marijke C van der Weide, Renske J P M Cornelisse-van Vugt, Gavin W Ten Tusscher, Claire A M Lutterman, Arvid W A Kamps, Carmen M Lorente Flores, Jeroen Hol, Henriëtte van Laerhoven, Maarten Rijpert, Nadia A Oeij, Irene A M Schiering, Sylvia A Obermann-Borst, Douwe H Visser, Lisanne M van Leeuwen, René F Kornelisse, Annemarie M C van Rossum, Merijn W Bijlsma, Frans B Plötz, Niek B Achten
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of the early-onset sepsis calculator to reduce antibiotic exposure in at-risk newborns: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Bo M van der Weijden, Sanne W C M Janssen, Marijke C van der Weide, Renske J P M Cornelisse-van Vugt, Gavin W Ten Tusscher, Claire A M Lutterman, Arvid W A Kamps, Carmen M Lorente Flores, Jeroen Hol, Henriëtte van Laerhoven, Maarten Rijpert, Nadia A Oeij, Irene A M Schiering, Sylvia A Obermann-Borst, Douwe H Visser, Lisanne M van Leeuwen, René F Kornelisse, Annemarie M C van Rossum, Merijn W Bijlsma, Frans B Plötz, Niek B Achten","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborns are at risk for early-onset sepsis (EOS), occurring 0.2-2.0 per 1000 live births, and for antibiotic overtreatment: approximately 5-15% receive antibiotics for suspected EOS under conventional guidelines with categorical risk factor assessment. Use of the multivariate neonatal EOS calculator prediction tool can reduce overtreatment, but no trials have been conducted to compare its safety to these categorical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April 12th, 2022, and March 19th, 2024, we conducted an open-label, two-armed, cluster-randomised controlled trial among newborns born at ≥34 weeks' gestational age with ≥1 EOS risk factor, comparing 10 hospitals randomised 1:1 to EOS calculator use versus categorical guideline use (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05274776). The EOS calculator was slightly adapted for Dutch use. The co-primary non-inferiority outcome assessed safety using four predefined harm criteria (respiratory support, circulatory support, referral to intensive care unit, and culture-confirmed EOS). Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relative risk did not exceed 1.5. The co-primary superiority outcome assessed the reduction of participants starting antibiotic therapy for suspected EOS within 24 h postpartum. Secondary endpoints were the duration of antibiotic therapy and the initiation of antibiotic therapy between 24 and 72 h after birth. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>1830 newborns (183 per cluster) were included. At least one harm criterion was present in 64 (7.0%) of 915 in the EOS calculator arm and 134 (14.6%) of 915 in the categorical guideline arm (relative risk 0.48; 95% Cl 0.36-0.63). Antibiotics for suspected EOS were started in 66 (7.2%) of 915 in the EOS calculator arm, compared with 243 (26.6%) of 915 in the categorical guideline arm (absolute risk reduction: 19.0%, 95% CI 11.3-26.7). Median duration of antibiotics was longer in the EOS calculator arm (5.5 days, IQR 1.8-6.6) than in the categorical guideline arm (2.1 days, IQR 1.6-6.3) (P 0.0019). We found no difference in the proportion of newborns started on antibiotic therapy for suspected EOS between 24 and 72 h after birth. Adverse event rates were similar between arms. Readmission for suspected early-onset sepsis occurred three times in the EOS calculator and two times in the categorical guideline arm. Any cultures obtained at readmission remained negative, and any symptoms resolved completely.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>These trial data support safety and effectiveness of the EOS calculator for harm criteria and for the proportion of participants that started antibiotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study was supported by SPIN, the General Paediatrics Research Network of the Dutch Association for Paediatrics, supported by het Cultuurfonds.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"87 ","pages":"103419"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103419","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Newborns are at risk for early-onset sepsis (EOS), occurring 0.2-2.0 per 1000 live births, and for antibiotic overtreatment: approximately 5-15% receive antibiotics for suspected EOS under conventional guidelines with categorical risk factor assessment. Use of the multivariate neonatal EOS calculator prediction tool can reduce overtreatment, but no trials have been conducted to compare its safety to these categorical guidelines.

Methods: Between April 12th, 2022, and March 19th, 2024, we conducted an open-label, two-armed, cluster-randomised controlled trial among newborns born at ≥34 weeks' gestational age with ≥1 EOS risk factor, comparing 10 hospitals randomised 1:1 to EOS calculator use versus categorical guideline use (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05274776). The EOS calculator was slightly adapted for Dutch use. The co-primary non-inferiority outcome assessed safety using four predefined harm criteria (respiratory support, circulatory support, referral to intensive care unit, and culture-confirmed EOS). Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relative risk did not exceed 1.5. The co-primary superiority outcome assessed the reduction of participants starting antibiotic therapy for suspected EOS within 24 h postpartum. Secondary endpoints were the duration of antibiotic therapy and the initiation of antibiotic therapy between 24 and 72 h after birth. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed.

Findings: 1830 newborns (183 per cluster) were included. At least one harm criterion was present in 64 (7.0%) of 915 in the EOS calculator arm and 134 (14.6%) of 915 in the categorical guideline arm (relative risk 0.48; 95% Cl 0.36-0.63). Antibiotics for suspected EOS were started in 66 (7.2%) of 915 in the EOS calculator arm, compared with 243 (26.6%) of 915 in the categorical guideline arm (absolute risk reduction: 19.0%, 95% CI 11.3-26.7). Median duration of antibiotics was longer in the EOS calculator arm (5.5 days, IQR 1.8-6.6) than in the categorical guideline arm (2.1 days, IQR 1.6-6.3) (P 0.0019). We found no difference in the proportion of newborns started on antibiotic therapy for suspected EOS between 24 and 72 h after birth. Adverse event rates were similar between arms. Readmission for suspected early-onset sepsis occurred three times in the EOS calculator and two times in the categorical guideline arm. Any cultures obtained at readmission remained negative, and any symptoms resolved completely.

Interpretation: These trial data support safety and effectiveness of the EOS calculator for harm criteria and for the proportion of participants that started antibiotic therapy.

Funding: This study was supported by SPIN, the General Paediatrics Research Network of the Dutch Association for Paediatrics, supported by het Cultuurfonds.

Abstract Image

早发脓毒症计算器减少高危新生儿抗生素暴露的安全性和有效性:一项集群随机对照试验
背景:新生儿有早发性脓毒症(EOS)的风险,每1000例活产发生0.2-2.0例,以及抗生素过度治疗的风险:大约5-15%的新生儿在常规指导下接受了疑似EOS的抗生素治疗,并进行了分类风险因素评估。使用多变量新生儿EOS计算器预测工具可以减少过度治疗,但尚未进行试验将其安全性与这些分类指南进行比较。方法:在2022年4月12日至2024年3月19日期间,我们在≥34周孕龄且EOS风险因素≥1的新生儿中进行了一项开放标签、双臂、集群随机对照试验,比较了10家医院1:1随机分配的EOS计算器使用与分类指南使用(ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT05274776)。EOS计算器稍微适应了荷兰人的使用。共同主要非劣效性结局使用四个预定义的危害标准(呼吸支持、循环支持、转介到重症监护病房和培养证实的EOS)评估安全性。如果相对风险的95%置信区间(CI)上限不超过1.5,则建立非劣效性。共同主要优势结果评估了产后24小时内开始抗生素治疗疑似EOS的参与者的减少。次要终点是抗生素治疗的持续时间和出生后24至72小时开始抗生素治疗。进行意向治疗和方案分析。结果:纳入新生儿1830例(每组183例)。在EOS计算器组的915例患者中有64例(7.0%)存在至少一个危害标准,在分类指南组的915例患者中有134例(14.6%)存在至少一个危害标准(相对风险0.48;95% Cl 0.36-0.63)。在EOS计算器组的915例患者中,66例(7.2%)开始使用抗生素治疗疑似EOS,而在分类指南组的915例患者中,243例(26.6%)开始使用抗生素(绝对风险降低:19.0%,95% CI 11.3-26.7)。EOS计算器组中位抗生素持续时间(5.5天,IQR 1.8-6.6)长于分类指南组(2.1天,IQR 1.6-6.3) (P < 0.0019)。我们发现新生儿在出生后24和72小时开始抗生素治疗疑似EOS的比例没有差异。两组不良事件发生率相似。疑似早发性脓毒症的再入院在EOS计算器组发生了3次,在分类指南组发生了2次。再入院时获得的任何培养均为阴性,任何症状均完全消失。解释:这些试验数据支持EOS计算器对危害标准和开始抗生素治疗的参与者比例的安全性和有效性。资助:本研究由SPIN支持,荷兰儿科协会的普通儿科研究网络,由et Cultuurfonds支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信