An artificial intelligence model integrating culprit lesion diagnosis and risk assessment for acute coronary syndrome.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103415
Peng Peng Xu, Bin Hu, Fan Zhou, Zhi Han Xu, Qian Chen, Tong Yuan Liu, Bang Jun Guo, Chang Sheng Zhou, Xin Wei Tao, Hong Yan Qiao, Jia Ni Zou, Xiang Ming Fang, Wen Cai Huang, Long Jiang Zhang
{"title":"An artificial intelligence model integrating culprit lesion diagnosis and risk assessment for acute coronary syndrome.","authors":"Peng Peng Xu, Bin Hu, Fan Zhou, Zhi Han Xu, Qian Chen, Tong Yuan Liu, Bang Jun Guo, Chang Sheng Zhou, Xin Wei Tao, Hong Yan Qiao, Jia Ni Zou, Xiang Ming Fang, Wen Cai Huang, Long Jiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An integrated machine learning (ML) approach capable of both diagnosing acute coronary syndrome (ACS, encompassing myocardial infarction and unstable angina) and predicting future ACS risk within defined optimal timeframes remains an unmet need in cardiovascular risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicentre cohort study in China between January 2012 and December 2021. The derivation cohort (cohort 1+ cohort 2), consisting of a training, validation, and independent external test set, retrospectively included 1854 patients from four hospitals who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and received a definitive diagnosis of ACS or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) within 7 days. The diagnostic performance of five commonly used ML algorithms for identifying ACS culprit lesions was developed and compared within this cohort. After selecting the optimal ML model, its performance was further validated in a single-center prospective cohort (cohort 3) and a nested case-control cohort (cohort 4) from two multicenter prospective cohorts to assess its ability to predict future ACS risk stratification (≥30 days).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The derivation cohort comprised 1854 participants, among whom 281 experienced new-onset ACS within 7 day. The single-centre prospective cohort included 563 participants, of whom 23 developed ACS during follow-up (median 60.0 months). The nested case-control cohort included 202 participants, of whom 43 developed ACS during follow-up (median 28.0 months). In the derivation cohort, the random forest (RF) model demonstrated the best diagnostic performance and robustness among the five ML algorithms for detecting ACS culprit lesions, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 across the training (95% confidence interval [Cl]: 0.82-0.89), validation (95% Cl: 0.80-0.90), and test sets (95% Cl: 0.78-0.92). In two prospective cohorts, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the RF model successfully stratified the risk of future ACS events (both log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001). The time-dependent AUC curve further indicated that the optimal validity period for the RF model derived from the culprit lesion was 2 years. The model's ability to distinguish ACS events within this period was superior to that of the stenosis severity model (AUC: Cohort 3: 0.79 [95% Cl: 0.66-0.93] vs. 0.67 [95% Cl: 0.52-0.82], <i>P</i> = 0.02; Cohort 4: 0.67 [95% Cl: 0.56-0.77] vs. 0.60 [95% Cl: 0.52-0.68], <i>P</i> = 0.05). Additionally, the RF model showed a significant improvement in performance compared to the stenosis severity model in both Cohorts 3 and 4 (all net reclassification improvement [NRI] values > 0).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The ACS culprit lesion model developed using RF algorithms demonstrated superior diagnostic performance and was effective for short-term (2-year) ACS risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2024ZD0521700), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82441019 for L.J. Z.).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"87 ","pages":"103415"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An integrated machine learning (ML) approach capable of both diagnosing acute coronary syndrome (ACS, encompassing myocardial infarction and unstable angina) and predicting future ACS risk within defined optimal timeframes remains an unmet need in cardiovascular risk stratification.

Methods: We conducted a multicentre cohort study in China between January 2012 and December 2021. The derivation cohort (cohort 1+ cohort 2), consisting of a training, validation, and independent external test set, retrospectively included 1854 patients from four hospitals who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and received a definitive diagnosis of ACS or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) within 7 days. The diagnostic performance of five commonly used ML algorithms for identifying ACS culprit lesions was developed and compared within this cohort. After selecting the optimal ML model, its performance was further validated in a single-center prospective cohort (cohort 3) and a nested case-control cohort (cohort 4) from two multicenter prospective cohorts to assess its ability to predict future ACS risk stratification (≥30 days).

Findings: The derivation cohort comprised 1854 participants, among whom 281 experienced new-onset ACS within 7 day. The single-centre prospective cohort included 563 participants, of whom 23 developed ACS during follow-up (median 60.0 months). The nested case-control cohort included 202 participants, of whom 43 developed ACS during follow-up (median 28.0 months). In the derivation cohort, the random forest (RF) model demonstrated the best diagnostic performance and robustness among the five ML algorithms for detecting ACS culprit lesions, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 across the training (95% confidence interval [Cl]: 0.82-0.89), validation (95% Cl: 0.80-0.90), and test sets (95% Cl: 0.78-0.92). In two prospective cohorts, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the RF model successfully stratified the risk of future ACS events (both log-rank P < 0.001). The time-dependent AUC curve further indicated that the optimal validity period for the RF model derived from the culprit lesion was 2 years. The model's ability to distinguish ACS events within this period was superior to that of the stenosis severity model (AUC: Cohort 3: 0.79 [95% Cl: 0.66-0.93] vs. 0.67 [95% Cl: 0.52-0.82], P = 0.02; Cohort 4: 0.67 [95% Cl: 0.56-0.77] vs. 0.60 [95% Cl: 0.52-0.68], P = 0.05). Additionally, the RF model showed a significant improvement in performance compared to the stenosis severity model in both Cohorts 3 and 4 (all net reclassification improvement [NRI] values > 0).

Interpretation: The ACS culprit lesion model developed using RF algorithms demonstrated superior diagnostic performance and was effective for short-term (2-year) ACS risk stratification.

Funding: This work was supported by the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2024ZD0521700), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82441019 for L.J. Z.).

急性冠脉综合征罪魁祸首病变诊断与风险评估相结合的人工智能模型。
背景:综合机器学习(ML)方法既能诊断急性冠脉综合征(ACS,包括心肌梗死和不稳定心绞痛),又能在确定的最佳时间框架内预测未来ACS的风险,这在心血管风险分层中仍然是一个未满足的需求。方法:我们于2012年1月至2021年12月在中国进行了一项多中心队列研究。衍生队列(队列1+队列2)由训练、验证和独立的外部测试集组成,回顾性纳入来自四家医院的1854例患者,这些患者接受了冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA),并在7天内确诊为ACS或慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)。在这个队列中,开发并比较了五种常用的ML算法用于识别ACS罪魁祸首病变的诊断性能。选择最佳ML模型后,在两个多中心前瞻性队列中的单中心前瞻性队列(队列3)和嵌套病例对照队列(队列4)中进一步验证其性能,以评估其预测未来ACS风险分层(≥30天)的能力。结果:衍生队列包括1854名参与者,其中281名在7天内出现新发ACS。单中心前瞻性队列包括563名参与者,其中23名在随访期间(中位60.0个月)发生ACS。巢式病例对照队列包括202名参与者,其中43名在随访期间(中位28.0个月)发生ACS。在衍生队列中,随机森林(RF)模型在检测ACS罪魁祸首病变的五种ML算法中表现出最佳的诊断性能和鲁棒性,在训练(95%置信区间[Cl]: 0.82-0.89)、验证(95% Cl: 0.80-0.90)和测试集(95% Cl: 0.78-0.92)中,接受者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)为0.85。在两个前瞻性队列中,Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,RF模型成功地对未来ACS事件的风险进行了分层(均log-rank P < 0.001)。随时间变化的AUC曲线进一步表明,罪魁祸首病变衍生的RF模型的最佳有效期为2年。该模型在此期间区分ACS事件的能力优于狭窄程度模型(AUC:队列3:0.79 [95% Cl: 0.66-0.93] vs. 0.67 [95% Cl: 0.52-0.82], P = 0.02;队列4:0.67 [95% Cl: 0.56-0.77] vs. 0.60 [95% Cl: 0.52-0.68], P = 0.05)。此外,与第3和第4组的狭窄严重程度模型相比,RF模型在性能上有显著改善(所有净重分类改善[NRI]值为> 0)。解释:使用RF算法建立的ACS罪魁祸首病变模型具有优越的诊断性能,并且对短期(2年)ACS风险分层有效。基金资助:非传染性慢性病国家科技重大专项(2024ZD0521700)和国家自然科学基金(李振中82441019)资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信